fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi
Islam Critic Ayaan Hirsi Ali Warns of French Civil War

A Somali-born critic of Islam said France may fall into a civil war if it cannot sort out issues like dealing with Radical Islam. Ayaan Hirsi Ali told Politico she believes France's new President Emmanuel Macron needs to seize control of crucial issues or risk losing his country.

She might have a point. Islam is not merely a religion. It's also a political ideology professing political supremacy of Muslim leadership and eliminating or subjugating all other religions plus non-believers. It's also a legal system (Sharia). It's also a military doctrine (e.g. how to wage a foreign policy of war and relentless political enmity until the non-Muslim world is destroyed, whereby terrorism is considered a legit tactic as long as the unbelievers are in an asymmetric position of power like today).

Read more... )
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
Is Paul Sperry a conspiracy theorist? The author of “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington” has now come up with a large piece for the NYP, where he argues at great length that Huma Abedin, the deputy chairlady of Hillary Clinton's campaign team, supports radical Islam. The author cites her decade as employee for the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, whose chief editor is her mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin (a Pakistani immigrant).

JMMA has, the author claims, regularly published articles professing radical Islam, like for example editorials by Huma's mother herself, advocating the limiting of women's rights, and arguing that the victims of rape are bringing it on themselves with the way they dress. The relevant excerpt:

"By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge. Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations. Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender. Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members."

It seems the journal has also occasionally given a tribune to 9-11 truther arguments, essentially supporting the view that the terror attacks had been provoked by the US itself because of its hostile policies to Muslim countries.

It might or might not be going deeper than that )
[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Hi, ma'fellow procrastinators reasonable honesty-loving folks! We may've heard of Erdogan's attempts to actively influence the political discourse and the level of free speech in Germany by demanding that a satirical depiction of His Greatness be removed from the press, lest he unleash the hordes of refugees onto Europe again (and indirectly succeeding to have the relevant journalist fired, by the way). But what about censorship for the sake of not-offending-anyone at a top state level? Case in point:

White House censors French president for saying ‘Islamist terrorism’

"President Obama is so paranoid about linking terrorists to the Muslim faith that when French President Francois Hollande used the phrase "Islamist terrorism" at a meeting in Washington, White House officials posted their official press video with audio of the words cut out completely. ... The White House's transcript of the event shows the French leader declared at the 4:49 minute mark that "the roots of terrorism, Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq." But rather than include Hollande's remark in its entirety, the Obama administration posted footage in which his interpreter’s English translation of the words "Islamist terrorism" was missing."

Surely, that was just an unintentional glitch, right? )
[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Greetings, ma'fellow indifferent procrastinators concerned citizens of the world! First of all, Im'ma throw this in here:

Richard Dawkins says 9/11 hijackers weren't evil, prompts angry response from religious right

First off, the right-wing, quite predictably, seem to have (intentionally?) misunderstood what he was actually saying. To me it reads that he's not saying the 911 attackers are not evil - but that they were not born evil, only they became evil under the influence of religion. Hardly inconsistent with what he's been, ehm... preaching, for quite a while.

That said, to put this into my local perspective, we here in my country have long prided (sic?) ourselves of our so called "ethnic model", i.e. our religious and ethnic tolerance - usually citing our centuries of relatively peaceful cohabitation with other ethnicities and religions as an example (among other, more heroic manifestations of that model). Which is probably why part of our society was so stunned by the "un-Christian" position of our nationalists about the Syrian refugees who've come knocking at our doorstep.

Read more... )
[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
Copenhagen shooting: One dead in deadly seminar attack

"Denmark is on high alert after a gunman in Copenhagen killed one person and injured three at a free speech debate attended by a Swedish cartoonist."

Leaving aside the curious fact that there haven't been too many Charlie Hebdo-style protest marches after this one (perhaps people do really tend to have a two-week attention span, and tend to "get over" such shocking trends a bit too fast), here's a watered-down, more politically correct version of the account of the Copenhagen events, specially worded for the more culturally sensitive.

Read more... )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
What is that thing that looks like ISIL, quacks like ISIL, but is not ISIL? Well, you may have already guessed it, that is Boko Haram. They have proclaimed their own Caliphate too, but in the north-eastern parts of Nigeria. They also shock with their cruelty, which is escalating every next year. Although Nigeria is Africa's biggest economy and one of the world's top oil producers, the weak corrupted government has been unable to stop the terrorist group. And, unless the broken political system is changed, the Nigerian jihadists will keep being on the rise, gradually turning their bloody campaign into a regional conflict.


Ever since Boko Haram launched their offensive in 2009, more than 16 thousand people have been killed, and a million have been driven off their homes. The group uses a myriad of tactics, from bombings to kidnapping to arson, affecting both Christian and Muslim communities. We all know of the case where 276 schoolgrirls were kidnapped from Shibok. Some managed to escape, others died, and others still were sold into slavery, or forcefully married to jihadist husbands. Turns out, that is not the worst of what these extremists are capable of.

Read more... )
[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Hey ma'fellow indifferent armchair-dwellers reasonable folks who care about freedom and peace almost as much as I do! Now that a week has passed since the act of barbarism in Paris which was instantly branded by some smartheads (and politicians) "a clash of civilizations", perhaps it's time to sit back a little and assess things a bit more soberly. In my opinion there's no such thing as a war of the civilizations, not really. Of course there can't be a yes or no answer to such complex issues spanning generations and even centuries, but still. On one side, this isn't a Muslims vs Christians clash per se. It's rather a conflict of values, one side refusing to adopt the other's values even when the former is being hosted by the latter, with all the hospitality that comes with that.

But even then, these are not "Christian" values by definition, but rather values of humanism. Free expression included. Unfortunately, many among the Muslim community do not necessarily identify with these valeus, or at least do not place them anywhere near the top of their list of priorities - but instead they fear they could lose their identity and damage their own culture and faith if they do. This couldn't be any further from reality, though. Adopting the principles of secularism, humanism and the Age of Enlightenment that have become so fundamental for the West would not only not undermine the Muslim world - it would most likely enrich it and allow it to develop - a process that Europe has been taking for granted for quite a while now. It's no surprise that the main factor for that was the separation of church and state, of religion and politics.

Read more of this incoherent diatribe )
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015/01/09/3610080/hezbollah-leader-says-islamic-extremists-have-hurt-islam-more-than-cartoonists/

So, essentially, Hezbollah, along with several organizations of moderate Muslims, has condemned the attack on the French satirists. Let's repeat this: Hezbollah,the Iranian proxy that's pretty much become everything Arafat's PLO was at the height of its power but  moreso, is actually more or less a voice of reason in this specific context. This is about on par with Pat Robertson sounding like a voice of reason on a controversial topic. Not only this, but he actually condemns people beheading other people in the name of Islam as a contradiction of the tenets of the religion, and doing more harm to it than anyone else.

To me, the article is one where it's hard to come up with commentary beyond the irony that an extremist working with an organization of murderers and cutthroats in the service of one of the most vicious dictators of the modern era can sound reasonable on anything. What this illustrates is that the stopped watch can be right twice a day, and that the people who dedicate themselves to the armed overthrow of much of the basis of the modern world are ultimately human beings and capable of entertaining multiple contradictory viewpoints at the same time.
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
Could a piece of fiction cause a hatred so strong that would lead to mass killings? The bloody attack in Paris leaving scores of dead innocents will probably add even more dramatism to the vision of one Michel Houellebecq of France as a possible future Islamic republic...


The attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo that became infamous for its critical positions against Islam and the Muhammad cartoons from previous years (and whose latest cover was directly inspired by Houellebecq's writings), could also have a connection to Houellebecq's new book, where he describes a fictitious scenario of the Islamisation of France.

Read more... )

Worrying update )
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com

You must've heard already - there's a wave of protests going through Germany as we speak, under this new organization PEGIDA (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamification of the West). They're claiming to be peacefully opposed to the Islamization of German society, while their detractors are predictably Godwinning the hell out of them, branding them with all sorts of Nazi epithets. There've also been counter-protests, again in the thousands, which the mainstream media have duly put the emphasis on, while attempting to portray the PEGIDA protesters as some sort of right-wing extremists.

No doubt there are plenty of extremists among them. But I've spoken to people who've been on both sides on the street, and I must tell you the bulk of them are just ordinary people who have their genuine concerns that they believe are valid. They don't want people being gassed in death chambers or detained in concentration camps. They don't want a "holy Crusade" against Muslims. They're just fed up with what they call the "failed multiculturalism model", which Merkel herself (who's now being quick to condemn them) has bashed on more than one occasion in the past.

Read more... )
[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
For decades, the Arab civilization has been going backwards, to finally reach its current bottom. There's chaos and tyranny reigning throughout the Arab world, and political Islam has nothing to do with popular representation. Generations of Arabs have let themselves be manipulated by various nationalists, socialists and Islamists, who've always preached that the enemy is beyond the fortress walls, while it was inside the city all the time. A great civilization has been plunged into chaos that won't go away any time soon.

All hopes that sprouted with the new Arab spring, are now but dead and buried. They didn't turn out as simple to realize as they initially seemed: people expected democratic participation in politics, and restoration of human dignity. But these hopes soon evaporated when they clashed with reality. What remains in their place is civil war, ethnic, religious and regional conflict, and resurging militant absolutism. The archaic, anachronistic Gulf monarchies and emirates alone (plus maybe Tunisia) are still able to withstand that level of disruption. Elsewhere in the Arab world there's essentially no legitimacy left. Instead of rolling up their sleeves and starting to clean up the mess, the Arabs are only digging ever deeper.

Read more... )
[identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com

"Do you have vacancies for executioners?" The question was asked by a wannabe Jihadist at the Ask.fm website. The Latvia-based social network allows users from around the world to ask questions to fellow users under the safe cover of anonymity. Along with Twitter, FB and Youtube, it's one of the most popular websites that IS (ISIS) uses for promoting their particular brand of fanatical extremism, and fill their ranks with new recruits from the West.

Thus, the video showing a man covered in black, and speaking in distinct British English, subsequently beheading US journalist James Foley, is not just meant to be a fear-inducing message, but a job announcement of some sorts. The masked suspect is known as John the Beatle (or Jihadi John) in the UK media, and is part of a trio that also included guys nicknamed Paul and Ringo. He used to be known as L Jinny for those who were familiar with the hip-hop scene of West London. The fact that he was the one to be selected for the main acting role in that horrible video, is no coincidence. The Jihadist propaganda machine is explicitly targeting young lads from London, Paris, Brussels and Stockholm, who also fancy themselves being executioners.

IS's skilful PR and unprecedented brutality has achieved one more thing: it has drawn the public attention to the increasing number of foreigners among the ranks of the group. The number of Europeans fighting for the radical Islamists in Iraq and Syria is not in the hundreds any more, but thousands, and keeps growing. The concern is that when these people come back home, they'll bring back what they've learned on the battlefield and in the Jihadist training camps, and some of them would be time bombs, now ticking inside Europe.

Read more... )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
"France has opened the gates of Hell. It has fallen into a trap more dangerous than Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia". With these words, the leader of the obscure Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), Omar Ould Hamaha responded to the French intervention against the Islamists in North Mali. Of course such threats against the West and its "crusaders" are commonplace. But they seldom have real consequences, and in more peaceful times they are not paid much attention to. But this time, only a few days later, the verbal threats materialised. Several hundred workers were trapped in a tightly guarded natural gas facility in Algeria, among them dozens of expatriates. The bloody drama that ensued was followed by all news networks around the world, and the picture of the organiser of the operation, Mokhtar Belmokhtar, was seen by millions of people. And he turned into the newest superstar or international jihadism. For the first time the extremists in the Sahara region turned all public attention to themselves.

From the point of view of institutional stability, particularly the state security machine, Algeria is much more advanced than the rest of North Europe at the moment. It is just not in the same league as Mauritania and Niger. This is why the terrorist attack was a clear message to the rest of the world. If they could hit a tightly guarded facility, 1000 km away from their main base, and in Algeria of all places, then they could practically hit anywhere in Sahara. This way the Islamists proved that the battle in North Mali would practically be fought all across North Africa. Which means that a broader approach is needed for addressing the systematic problems of the entire region.

Read more... )
[identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
http://www.france24.com/en/files/element_multimedia/image/carte_mali_EN.jpg

For more than half a year, a territory the size of Texas has been ruled by Sharia law. Women are not allowed outside their homes without male escort. Ancient tombs and temples are being destroyed for "contradicting pure Islam". "Crimes" such as possessing cigarettes, playing soccer or wearing "indecent clothes" are being punished by canning. Theft is punished by cutting an arm off. And those convicted of infidelity are stoned to death.

The black flags of Al Qaeda flow freely in the towns of Northern Mali, and the leaders of the African branch of the movement, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) have cast deep roots there. The area is awash with terrorist training camps where international jihadists are being trained. The rumours are that the majority of them come from Saharan and Sub-Saharan Africa, but there are also some Pakistanis, and fundamentalists from Europe.

The analogy to Taliban Afghanistan comes naturally. And naturally, the existence of such a place just a couple of hours' flight away from Europe poses a serious security threat not just for the entire region, but for the world at large. In this situation, the international intervention against the Islamists in Northern Mali was as undesirable, as it was unavoidable. And despite the controversial history of the French military interventions in Africa, president Francois Hollande may not have had much of a choice when he received a request from his Malian counterpart Dioncounda Traore to send troops against the incoming Islamists.

And thus, the war begins )
[identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
"Wow, good that I've just bombed some mosques and killed a few women and children, instead of making an anti-Muhammad video. THEN people would've surely risen against me!" This is a jape made in the fake Bashar Assad twitter account. Joke or not, it is spot on about some nuances in the whole avalanche of protests throughout the Middle East in the recent couple of weeks.

By now everyone has learned that the mass demonstrations spanning 20 countries from Tunisia to Pakistan and from Egypt to Afghanistan were inflamed by that Youtube video. And of course the comments of the "We told you so" type weren't late to follow. And comments about Muslims being a bunch of fanatics incapable of democracy. And conclusions like "We knew from the start that removing the dictatorial regimes would lead to nothing good".

But amidst all this storm of anger, violence and indignation at a video, some deeper cracks are to be seen that go beyond the mere cultural differences between the West and the Islamic world. The grotesque scenes on the Arab streets and the murder of the US ambassador in Libya are raising a number of questions about the US (and European) policies in the region as well, the question being "Why do they hate us so much". Meanwhile, the constantly moving sands of post-revolutionary Libya, Egypt and Tunisia are raising the question about the ability of their new leaders to secure normalcy and stability. But all of this doesn't mean the Arab spring has suddenly become an Arab autumn. Not yet. And it doesn't mean that the West's relations with the region are irreparably broken, and America and Europe should withdraw the hand they had stretched with such enthusiasm.

And withdrawing the stretched hand would be a disaster )
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
...Or rather, the plan of a self-appointed peace envoy who presumes to speak on behalf of the entire Al Qaeda (if such an organization really exists, as opposed to being a mere label which most extremists tend to stick to themselves at this point). Anyway, behold the ingenious plan:

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/10/world/meast/zawahiri-peace-plan/index.html

It has bullet points, OMG!

• U.S. and West to stop intervening in Muslim lands
• U.S. to stop interfering in Muslim education
• U.S. to end the war on Islam
• U.S. to release all Islamist prisoners.

And some recommendations, too! )
[identity profile] tangaroa.livejournal.com
The Republicans have very little going for them. They are wrong on economic policy, they reject the Constitution, they celebrate and protect corruption, they are completely without morals. The only reason to vote for one might be if the Democrats decide to openly side with al-Qaeda or something.
Read more... )
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
The Islamists are the big winner from the first round on the parliamentary elections in Egypt. The top 3 parties are of various Islamist stripes and they form 65% of the vote combined. But there are some differences that are not to be overlooked.

First, two links from Reuters:

Strict Muslims stake claim on Egypt's political scene
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/21/us-egypt-election-salafis-idUSTRE7AK0OF20111121
Egypt Salafis want no pact with Muslim Brotherhood
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/04/us-egypt-salafi-idUSTRE7B30MN20111204

The Freedom and Justice Party (the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood) won 36% of the vote on the first round, followed by the Salafist party An-Nur with 24% and the liberal coalition Egyptian Bloc with 13%. The moderate Islamist party Al-Wasat won 4.3%. This is on the first tour where 30% of the seats were up for grabs. The rest will be decided on the second tour and the final result will be known in January.

What does this mean? )
[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
In a nutshell, the biggest fear after the Arab spring sounds like this: "But what if the Islamists come to power!?" At first sight the victory of Al Nahda in Tunisia, the calls for imposing Shariah law in Libya and the popularity of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt could be interpreted as an Islamist revival. But is that really so?

After the Arab spring the logical question is where's the place of the Christians in this new Middle East. Until now at least at first sight the impression was that the dictators were tolerating the secular character of the state and were in favor of the peaceful coexistence of the Muslim majority with the Christian minority. But now we're seeing Al Jazeera reports from Damascus where horrified Christians claim they'd rather support Assad because they used to feel safer under his regime. How desperate is that?

Read more... )
[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com
In order to woo British voters, the BNP has dropped anti Semitism from its agenda
and now targets Muslims instead. Hitler gave anti Semitism a bad name, and when the presenter on BBC's programme 'Question Time' reminded the BNP spokesman Nick Griffin that Griffin himself had once said 'Hitler just went a bit too far' it proved to be disastrous for Griffin as he fumbled for an answer to distance himself from his earlier position. Read more... )

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031 

Summary