[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
Dear GOP,

I know you talk the talk of "freedom" and "liberty" but I am not sure those words mean what you think they mean.
Read more... )
[identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
When last I ranted I promised to share any "gems" I found in the 2012 Republican Party Platform. I don't like posting too often, but traipsing across this item just got my blood boiling. Let's read:

Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service for the Twenty-First Century

The dire financial circumstances of the Postal Service require dramatic restructuring. In a world of rapidly advancing telecommunications, mail delivery from the era of the Pony Express cannot long survive. We call on Congress to restructure the Service to ensure the continuance of its essential function of delivering mail while preparing for the downsizing made inevitable by the advance of internet communication. In light of the Postal Service’s seriously underfunded pension system, Congress should explore a greater role for private enterprise in appropriate aspects of the mail-processing system.


This bit of dreck deserves to be examined line by line. Strap in. )

I'm going to stop reading this Platform thing for a while. It's too full of the stoopid, if not of the Pure Evil.
[identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com
Who said we were forever divided as a people? Probably every conservative in this community.

Despite the shrilly protests of conservatives that Tea Party supporters and Occupy members have nothing in common, including political agendas, Georgians untied united today under quite a diverse tent to circumvent bad bills into becoming bad laws.

Occupy Atlanta, Tea Party Patriots Defeat SB 469
Written By: GLORIA TATUM 3-30-2012
(APN) ATLANTA -- Thursday, March 29, 2012, the last day of the General Assembly, began for Occupy Atlanta, unions, religious leaders, leaders of the Civil Rights Movement, community activists, and the Tea Party at 9:30am with a prayer vigil outside the Capitol steps.

Activists continued with a rally to speak out against some of the most oppressive bills. SB 469 was the main target for the day, commonly called the anti-free speech, anti-union bill.

As previously covered by APN, this legislation contained provisions making it an aggravated misdemeanor to protest on or near private property, punishable by a year in prison and fines of one thousand dollars per day.


So we had tea partiers supporting unions because unions were supporting the progressives, civil rights activists, occupiers and tea partiers on the criminal trespass bill. Once the most unconstitutional criminization of organized public protest  was stripped, and there was nothing but an anti-union bill, did the Tea Partiers go "Poof! Fuck YOU lib'rel"?

No. They stuck with them. Right there with the po-po and their guns and handbands and shows of force hrumph hrumph!

You conservatives and your feeble attempts to divide and control. It is no longer working. The walls are cracking. Your wank fu is weakening and your leadership candidates are stuck in a rut so deep it's going to take a gang of singing Negro's to pull you out of (Think Blazing Saddles).

I'm proud to be a Georgian...today. And I want you all to know that we can work together for Change We Can All Live With™

PS: In before YOUR SOURCES IS BLAH BLAH. I know this source personally. He just won a big GA supreme court case challenging sunshine law violations with the City of Atlanta. Argued them before the SCOGA personally. I can assure you all that it happened just like this.
[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
Whenever I hear someone use that absurd argument that: "unions were useful once, but they've outlived their purpose" (its a claim my brother makes) I can't help but get frustrated. frustrated that people who claim such nonsense don't consider things like this

Now, I am SURE some people here will defend the rights of the employer to do whatever the fuck they want and hey, they sure can--but you know what, you should also defend the right of the employee to unionize and say FUCK YOU to the boss that treats them unfairly.

Your thoughts?

start wearing purple wearing purple
start wearing purple for me now
all your sanity, and wits they will all vanish
i promise
it's just a matter, of time.
[identity profile] msmichelle.livejournal.com
Madison, WI.

When Scott Walker put his plans into motion, we were personally affected. My husband's lab at the UW is totally funded by NIH grants, has NOTHING to do with the state budget, yet he was part of the cuts. Despite being in a university setting, he has to run that shop like a small business...generating revenue from "customers" (ie: grad students, gene therapy staff, professors) to cover overhead, salaries and benefits and he is not the only gig in town. He used to enjoy that sole proprietary status, but since gene therapy has become such a HOT money maker, especially here...at least 10 other digital microscopy labs have popped up.

So, his benefits were cut too. He is not even in a union. So, he hates Scott Walker and the whole thing pisses me off as well

I think its safe to use teachers not in higher education as an illustration here, since they are at the crux of this debate. K-12 teachers will thrive under Walker's proposals. Good teachers will continue to shine, while slackers and those who commit crimes and rightly expect (under our current system) to enjoy paid administrative leave will be screwed. I think those teachers who spend thousands of dollars every year to supply their classroom with needed-but-unfunded-by-our broke (sometimes corrupt) districts, will see a bump in income. Granted, these profiles typically fit the elementary school educators but still, I was always baffled when my post college roommate collected the same salary as say, another high school Calculus teacher I know who clearly was not meant to be in education. The Kindergarten teacher friend filled our apartment's storage closet with 1000s of dollars in supplies her classroom needed, but was unfunded by our mismanaged school district. The unions were not suffering at any point through all of this. The calculus teacher basically admitted to a group of us that she stumbled upon eductation as a major, and hated (mostly the girls) in her class, hated that she didn't drive a brand new car, and just, her job made her generally depressed. Many mental health days on the taxpayers dime but her melancholy self was covered under the unions.

My sister in law is the type of person you meet and can tell within 5 minutes that she has a way with kids (ask my kids, my nieces and nephews...she is their star) and is passionate about their development. She teaches second grade and is widely acclaimed by her peers I've met. My aunt, OTOH, is a high school PE teacher who, together with her PE teacher husband, use their coaching positions at the school to give their own offspring the starting QB positions, starting volleyball positions as sophomores, etc, and have even been called on these transparent behaviors in the press. Guess which one opted out of paying the 1K in union dues this year? My sister in law is confident in her abilities, strong in her convictions and doesn't need a union to "back her up" ie: take 1K annually out of her growing family's income for "union dues." My aunt brought the Recall Walker petition to our Thansgiving gathering and got completely shut down by everyone but my husband. He told her he'd already signed it in Madison, she encouraged him to sign the petition AGAIN (he refused) which is the kind of tactics Recall Walker folks have been using. The recall signatures have been collected and now our state has to spend more $$ (that we don't have) to verify each and every signature on the recall petition. Scott Walker hasn't done anything illegal...he has divided our state and created a lot of discord, yes, but he hasn't even committed an offense that justifies a recall. Yet, here we are.

Teachers will thrive under a non union arrangement. There simply is no need for an uninformed union rep to cut into the end product. Education is too far reaching to go on the way it has. Post Walker reform, there are many school districts here in Wisconsin that are not even interested in ratifying the union, despite the voices up at our Capitol (again, typically not teachers) loudly suggesting otherwise. Politics and emotion are closely linked, of course. I just hope that logic will prevail for the sake of education's future. There is a huge opportunity to set a precident here, and fact is being obscured by protest signs that compare Walker to Mussolini. It's not looking good...the few teachers I know who honored their contract last year during the walkouts and showed up for work ended up being shunned by their peers who spent DAYS up at the Capitol although their protests would have been heard after school too and would have given their displaced students a more positive adult role model message than skipping out. Our 14 Senators who skipped out on their duties and hung out in Rockford, IL (on the taxpayers' dime) for several weeks were given a stuning "war hero" welcome home when they actually returned to their office jobs. Yeah, pretty crazy.

Madison is defintely living up to its 80 square miles surrounded by reality reputation. We all could have gone on with the unions taking a cut, but we had someone come in who clearly wanted to do more than theorize for the next generation, he took action. It's change and it's hard to accept but if you break through the rhetoric, it is taking education in the right direction.

So, I've asked and havent gotten a good answer...what I am missing in this whole spectacle? I know it's not cool, not Hollywood, to support Walker but WTF?


Xposted
[identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
A few months back, I posted about the Occupy Wall Street movement and all of the negative trends that are impacting today's twenty-something generation. While I was writing that, I was also thinking about some of what I want to write now. Call it an overdue companion post.

If you don't like the way I write, don't click here: )
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
As we know, Newt Gingrich, the current GOP frontrunner has doubled down on his idea of getting rid of all those dumb ol’ child labor laws and paying schoolkids to clean toilets and occasionally mop up vomit in the hallways.

Read more )
[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
"Unions drove jobs overseas!"/"Employers will just move to China!"

This is a bad meme. Unions stood up for workers rights. Employers didn't feel like respecting those rights, so they found someplace else on the planet which they could disrespect the rights of workers and turn a bigger profit.

This meme implies that the appropriate course of action for the worker is to just accept the employers demands. Shut up and accept the McJob. Don't fight for higher pay--that'll make the employer exploit someone else!

This is a bad meme. It should be dropped.
[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
Sotheby's is the 1%.

http://www.sothebys.com/en/catalogues/ecatalogue.html/2011/contemporary-art-evening-sale-n08791#/r=/en/ecat.fhtml.N08791.html+r.m=/en/ecat.list.N08791.html/0/60/estlh/asc/

The cheapest painting sold for slightly over 420,000 USD
A single painting. The CHEAPEST painting. nearly 10 years of labor for the 50th percentile of american income earners (50% is 44K/year, sourced to wiki)

We know what we are protesting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYduewUsX3o&feature=related

Neil Cuvato at Fox, our trustworthy friend, can always be trusted to shill for the rich.
The most expensive painting was sold for over 60,000,000 USD (or over 100 years of labor for the 50th percentile)

EDIT: I assume people know why there was a protest at Sotheby's. If people don't: Sotheby's is union-busting.
They want all the money from their massive art sales for themselves. They don't want to share their vast sums of money with their workers. Labor is a key part of the 99%. Sotheby's is part of the 1%.
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
http://news.yahoo.com/longshoremen-storm-wash-state-port-damage-rr-144921214.html

OK, my first reaction is "Ha ha ha these people are stupid."

My second reaction is to note that this is actually less a clear-cut case of labor violence against capital than some with varying agendas might turn it into. As noted here:

No one was hurt, and nobody has
been arrested. Most of the protesters returned to their union hall after
cutting brake lines and spilling grain from car at the EGT terminal,
Duscha said.

The International
Longshore and Warehouse Union believes it has the right to work at the
facility, but the company has hired a contractor that's staffing a
workforce of other union laborers.

This is a case of one union deciding employers were hiring the wrong unions, not so much red flags and barricades. The whole thing seems stupid and a tempest in a teakettle to me and to have benefited nobody in particular. I believe there are situations where Unions can and should use all means necessary to secure workers' rights. I do not think this is one of those cases. Your thoughts?
[identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
"The world's largest aerospace and defense company is accused by the National Labor Relations Board, an independent government agency, of putting the second 787 line in South Carolina to punish Washington-based workers for past strikes."

This has been around for a week or so by now, but I haven't seen anyone post on it.

This strikes me as a particularly odd argument for the NLRB to be making. First, it presumes that it knows beyond a doubt that the act of locating the new plant was primarily an act of retribution against the unions because SC is a right to work state, and not a financial one. It presumes that the act of choosing a location for a plant can reasonably be construed as a hostile act against union workers. (If it was, could not the NLRB's actions be construed as a hostile act against the non-union workers in SC? More on that later.)

That's just the tip of the iceberg however, because should such a move like the NLRB is currently pushing for ever be successful, can there be much doubt of a chilling effect on the economy of the prospective state being considered for expansion sites? No sane mind would choose to risk the cost of a new plant if there was even the possibility that the rug could be pulled out from under them at the last moment, essentially by fiat.

On top of that, such moves will only end up hurting workers who aren't union (they're not less worthy of work than the union folks in another state, and if they are someone has a lot of rhetorical work ahead of them to justify it, in my opinion).

I'll let everyone else weigh in now...
[identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
Crossroads GPS released an ad concerning Obama, unions, and health care reform waivers.



It seems awfully convenient that the same groups who spent millions to get Obama into office, then spent millions more to push government-run health care were quick to apply for waivers exempting them from the very health care plan they supported!

AARP, one of the major backers of health care reform (though they tried hard to claim otherwise), is the most recent donor recipient.

In March, Crossroads GPS filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services after they failed to disclose any and all documents regarding their process for approving the waivers. The lawsuit is seeking judicial enforcement of the initial FOIA request Crossroads GPS filed.

Nancy Pelosi's district has the highest number of health care reform waivers approved in April - about 1 in 5. Thirty-one were for unions. (In the spirit of objectivity, 27 waivers were granted to health care/drug companies in Pelosi's district in April as well.)

There's a serious lack of transparency with this administration and this is just one more demonstration of it, not to mention the obvious payoff that's going on here. The whole health care reform plan was passed as something that was for everyone's benefit, but I guess for Obama's supporters, it's now a hard pill to swallow.
[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com
The liberal media isn't doing their job and talking much about this story yet, but it's making its rounds in places like HuffPo and the like. I won't bother to link until I find more objective sources (aside from this), but let me share what I've heard thus far and hope I haven't been punked by an elaborate April Fool's joke.

Firefighters and police have long been two unions with strong conservative leanings, regularly endorsing GOP candidates more often than Democrats. Therefore it was notable when they stood in support of unions during the Wisconsin "budget" proposals even though their unions were exempt from losing their right to bargain collectively.

In Ohio they are doing the same thing, but this time police or firefighters aren't exempt. One could argue that they done goofed when doing this, and that consequences will never be the same.

Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police has apparently warned the GOP that they are taking things too far. According to HuffPo he told them that “There is a distinct possibility that the pro-labor candidate in the next election will be looked at much more favorably than their overall record". And while I know HuffPo isn't the best source for information out there, so far Mr. Canterbury hasn't disputed these remarks. He was also on Rachel Maddow and his rhetoric should worry Republicans.

This could result in a huge paradigm shift if even police and firefighters turn on the GOP, both politically and financially. What kind of impact do you see in all this, assuming Republicans stay the course? Since they've embraced the Tea Party I don't see how they back off without suffering an outright implosion.

Their biggest mistake was assuming their gains were because mainstream America had suddenly embraced the Tea Party as well. The last election was a mandate on the economy and the lack of jobs, and Republicans are ignoring this at their peril.
[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
I guess I'm wordy this week.



A lot has been said about Wisconsin governor Scott Walker's union bill being unpopular in Wisconsin, that it's not really the will of the people, etc. The image above details all the states currently considering a similar bill, or a bill more substantial (not listed for whatever reason is Tennessee). They haven't been happening quietly everywhere, but these states are not becoming the battlegrounds that Wisconsin became for whatever reason, and many of them will pass their bills in some form without too much pain.

Has Walker provided the courage that these states and Republican politicians have up to this point lacked? Are we seeing a sea change in how we view public sector unions nationally now that the conversation has been introduced? Given the amount of flack Walker's gotten, fairly or unfairly, does the fact that the politicians in these other states don't appear to care about getting similar ramifications tell us anything about what to expect over the next few years?

Lawless

10/3/11 09:06
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
As I was saying:

Republican Wisconsin State Senator Scott Fitzgerald on what Walker’s union busting is REALLY all about:

If we win this battle, and the money is not there under the auspices of the union, Obama is going to have a much more difficult time winning this election and winning the state of Wisconsin.


Read more )
[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
The Republicans in Wisconsin made their move:

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Republicans in the Wisconsin Senate voted Wednesday night to strip nearly all collective bargaining rights from public workers after discovering a way to bypass the chamber's missing Democrats.

...

The Senate requires a quorum to take up any measures that spend money. But Republicans on Wednesday split from the legislation the proposal to curtail union rights, which spends no money, and a special conference committee of state lawmakers approved the bill a short time later.


The bill will apparently be completely done tomorrow morning and sent for signature. I have no clue why the Republicans didn't do this a month ago, and put an end to this whole thing that became a PR battle/pissing match, but it looks like the next step has been initiated.

Thoughts in general? Will we see a general strike? Polling has been inconsistent - how will the voters ultimately react, especially if a general strike occurs?
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
Dick Morris on Sean Hannity, 2/28/11:

We may at long last have a way to liberate our nation from the domination of those who should be our public servants but instead are frequently our union masters and free our politics from their financial power…What is at stake here really is freeing our schools so that we could keep good teachers and fire bad ones, freeing our state government so we don’t have high local taxes (and exactly how are those good teachers going to be paid?) and obliterating the financial power base of the Democratic Party.




The money quote is underlined above. This attack on collective bargaining is not about helping kids. It’s about establishing what amounts to a one-party system. Eliminate the power of unions and the G.O.P., with its corporate backing, gets to run things pretty much unopposed.

These people do not grasp the most basic principle of an open society – equal access to the political process as a voter and as a candidate.

Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes

*
[identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com

So here’s my idea. Public-sector workers should definitely abandon the whole union thing. Instead, they should establish public-sector HR outsourcing companies that handle payroll, benefits administration, etc. for the states. They can charge the states a little bit more than they’re paying now, but structure the contracts so that so that obligations for the out-years get amortized over a longer period—thereby alleviating the immediate pressure on state treasuries.

Also, the restructured payments would be optioned out as contract renewals, rather than under-funded entitlements—so they would be less detrimental to the state’s bond ratings.

Then, these new HR outsourcing organizations should skim 15% off the top and use whatever is left over for salaries, pension investments, etc.

Finally, these public-sector HR outsourcers should go public. This is key. HR outsourcing is very hot right now. The influx of capital will help fund both near-term cash-flow shortfalls and expansion into other markets.

So instead of being vilified for extorting money from the state, these new HR outsourcers can be hailed by Wall Street and its allies for innovation and profitability. Sure, teachers will get a little less money and the states won’t really save anything. But there will be profit for bankers. And that’s all that counts, isn’t it?

Oh, one more thing. Instead of backing Democratic candidates as they did historically as unions, the new HR outsourcers should contribute to Republican campaigns.

I know. Genius.


[identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
Will the protests further stoke the resentment many harbor for public worker's unions? Or will the backlash in reaction to Republican attempts to throttle organized labor be the bigger impact of these events? What about people like me, people who have criticisms of some aspects of public unions but generally support the idea that public workers should have decent wages and pensions? (Really all people should have the opportunity to work for those things.) Are these events making "nuanced" positions invisible?

I mean... I'm ticked off enough to start sticking SOLIDARITY stickers all over my face. (Will that help?) yet, I don't feel this accurately represents my views on the essential, yet easily corruptible role of unions in this country. *sigh*
[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com


David Brooks, conservative editorial writer at the New York Times wrote that "states with public sector unions tend to run into financial crises." Several people have looked at that assertion and well, the data doesn't support that.

More explanation behind this cut! )

There are many reasons why the states are running high deficits (e.g. loss of funding for the pensions for a variety reasons: many pension funds were invested at several failed banking instutitions-- the California Public Employees' Retirement System lost nearly 1 billion dollars of its assets at Lehman Brothers when that firm collapsed), falling real estate values, the most protracted recession since the Great Depression, high unemployment, and a Federal government that faces the same issues). But it's not because of unions.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 272829 3031 

Summary