johnny9fingers: (Default)
[personal profile] johnny9fingers
It is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel.

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/27/trump-iraq-location-tweet-troops-visit-revealed

Doesn't Trump understand basic security considerations for special operatives? Obviously not. What is interesting is these chaps welcomed President Trump with open arms, now that simple act has compromised the integrity of their mission, and their personal safety.

Does the panel think that any of the others of us would be imperilled by shaking the Donald's hand? It is often theorised that after the apocalypse, the only things alive will be cockroaches and Keef; does this mean that, alone among us all, like Thor with Mjolnir, that Keef could shake 45's hand and come away unscathed?

My own opinion is that unless actually in possession of superpowers, being in the Donald's aegis may be more hazardous than is comfortable. And, of course, that you get what you vote for, as we will find out all too soon.
mahnmut: (Default)
[personal profile] mahnmut
I don't know how much more proof is needed that a border wall will not work. Latest case in point: two people were caught on camera climbing over a border wall by MSNBC the other day.

You build it, they'll simply go over it. Or around it. Or under it. And here’s an inconvenient truth: the majority of undocumented immigrants flew into the US on legal status. When it ran out, they just stayed.. How do you fix that? Answer: you can't. The supid wall is nothing but an expensive boondoggle. It will change nothing.

A wall is a very expensive, ineffective and stupid way to deal with the issue. There already are tunnels where parts of a wall have been built. If you want in badly enough, you will find a way in.

It didn't use to be that way, though. But Bush, and to a much greater degree Obama, drastically improved border protection policy over the past decade or so. That's the real reason why border apprehensions have gradually decreased since the early 2000s. Sure, they still exist, but all Trump is doing is slapping a coat of paint on the wall without fixing the leak.

The purpose of this wall isn't to keep immigrants out, it's to transfer tax-payer's money to construction companies who bought a favor with Trump.
johnny9fingers: (Default)
[personal profile] johnny9fingers
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/21/secret-service-cant-pay-agents-because-trumps-frequent-travel-large-family/529075001/

http://uk.businessinsider.com/secret-service-trump-tower-rent-command-post-2017-8

Now, what makes me think that Trump was trying to gouge another few percent from the Secret Service in order to allow them to do the job they are no longer being payed for, having hit their overtime cap.

All his accusations about Obama taking vacations, costing civil and Secret service money and time, now look rather tame when one considers 45's first seven months of office.

America. This is insane. This is an insane situation. I'm sorry I repeated myself. It is for emphasis. We can read between the lines and draw conclusions ourselves. You have an asset-stripper in charge. Sooner or later it just becomes good business for 45 to sell the family silver alongside the family secrets to the highest bidder. Let's hope the Koch Brothers can outbid Uncle Vlad or Chinacorp TM.

The thing is, his supporters will still support him and consider themselves patriots. It's almost like they don't understand what words mean, or live in a Cheshire Cat reality where words mean only what he says they mean.

Maybe official business needs to be carried out at official residences and places of work. This maybe Trump's actual legacy to the White House: after his egregious usage of the office for his own business advantage, it appears that constitutional checks aren't working properly, and need either restating, or reformulating to prevent abuse.
[identity profile] dreamville-bg.livejournal.com
Other than Trump looking for distractions and liking to "fire" subordinates more than anything else to judge from his tenure on The Apprentice, it made no sense to fire Yates over refusing to defend Trump's executive order temporarily barring refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim countries - an action that had been challenged in court. Why? Because, that's the job of the Solicitor General. Pending Sessions' approval as AG, Trump had it well within his power to appoint a temporary advocate dedicated to prosecuting his flawed constitutional interpretation of an EO overriding the establishment's clause. But, firing Yates after she had warned the administration about Flynn's possibly traitorous behavior exposing agents in place to certain death at the hands of Putin? That's a coverup on the way to high treason.

Another bad thing about this is that when all the dirt comes fully out, and if Trump is gotten rid of, one way or another, the US is still stuck with Republicans. Especially a Torquemada-like Vice President, an experienced politician who would smoothly push his poisonous agenda. If this were England, you guys could have new elections and finally get the first female president. Or something even better.

On the other hand, even a Torquemada for prez is still better than the Orange Fuhrer with his freakishly small fingers on the nuclear button...

The least among several evils, duh?
[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
How fast the tide turns, eh? Bringing tons of crabs, who are coming to bite you on the ass...

ISIS Bans Burqas: Islamic State Deems Hijab A Security Problem In Iraq

"Militant leaders banned burqas after a group of veiled women carried out attacks against several ISIS commanders, according to media reports Tuesday. Women wearing burqas will no longer be allowed to enter buildings in Mosul, an ISIS stronghold, while wearing the full-body covering. Instead, they must wear gloves and gauze to cover their eyes. ISIS' morality police will continue to require women to wear the burqa outside of Mosul's new security rule, the Jerusalem Post reported."

See? Even ISIS considers the burqa a security problem! Wow. Just. Wow.

But we already knew ISIS and France had a lot in common.

I'd like to acknowledge the women who made this possible, who are only a footnote in this story - the brave women who snuck into these security centers to blow up ISIS leaders. We don't know their names, but most likely they gave their lives to strike a blow at ISIS. Let's take a minute for them. There are Good Terrorists Freedom-Fighters, after all!

But before we've rejoiced over women's rights, nope - that's not about women's rights in the ISIS-controlled territories. Women continue to be treated like cattle there (hey, even the Decency Police that patrols Mosul consists of women). And no female is allowed to show their face from under the burqa in a public place. One can't help but wonder how do they get their vitamin D in those things...
[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
FBI Drops iPhone Case Against Apple After Outside Hack Succeeds

"A mysterious method suggested by a third party appears to have allowed the FBI to hack into the iPhone belonging to Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the attackers in last year’s shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., prompting the agency to withdraw its legal case against Apple."

LOL. Witnessing the whole debate unravel about how they "broke in", I couldn't help but smirk. Makes you wonder how come some of the biggest smartheads in the industry could've missed the whole point of this exercise.

Do bear with me, as I delve into this conspiracy! )
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Apple likely to invoke free-speech rights in encryption fight
...
NYC police: Criminals say Apple encryption a ‘gift from God’

It's the eternal fight, isn't it. Civil rights like personal privacy and free speech against public concerns like national security.

The bottom-line is elsewhere, though. Apple would certainly help the government open a terrorist's encrypted cellphone, or do anything it pleases really, if the government allows Apple to repatriate the billions in profits it now holds overseas.

It's because Apple's bottom-line is the same as that of any other corporation: it cares about money first and foremost. It's highly doubtful that what they are truly concerned about is high-minded ideals like liberty, freedom and privacy. These are only tangentially related to their business, as long as it's what the majority of their customers espouse.

That said, once the government finally gets the de-encryption tools, who's to say how they might proceed using it.

Of course, there's then the fact that Jihadist terrorism is more of a nuisance rather than an existential threat to national welfare - if we look at the stats, that is. We've talked about this before. More people are killed in school shootings per week than in Jihadist terrorist attacks per decade. But yeah - nuance and perspective, who cares about them?

If I were this Apple guy, I'd reject the notion of designing software to beat my own encryption tools. I mean, once Teh Gubmint gets their paws on the de-encryption tool, what would be its worth for iPhones and the like? My bet would be on zilch.
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/16/france-nationwide-state-of-emergency

^The USA, to be sure, reacted to 9/11 by creating a bloated and inefficient security apparatus barely able to find its ass with a neon-lit map and a big-ass arrow. That this is not working very well for the United States is proven by the results of the expansion of the surveillance apparatus in producing a state able readily to maintain a prison population on par with the Stalin-era Gulag but unable in any real sense to achieve much for the bloated apparatus produced.

http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/22/zakaria-incarceration-nation/

However France, a nation with good reasons from 1792. the trainwreck of Napoleon I and Napoleon III, and Vichy to not indulge in mass autocratic policies, is now not only establishing a state of emergency, but its leader is behaving in a fashion that if he were not a socialist would lead one to see a pattern of Putinism and replicating all the unpleasantry of Hungary except now it's Western Europe. In the United States, rule of law remains a good idea yet to be implemented over parts of its territory south of the Mason-Dixon Line, as its willing nullification of laws to protect voting illustrate. The USA also only sporadically outsources its repression apparatus outside of the African-American community in terms of the iron fist, and so long as their ox isn't gored, too many Americans don't care.

In this case, France has had several experiences with leaders who opportunistically roll back rights in the name of security. These experiences every time without exception produce catastrophe.

So why in the everloving Hell are they repeating what has never worked before as though it's going to work now? 
[identity profile] stewstewstewdio.livejournal.com

Cyberwar

We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces. - Carl Sagan

By now everybody has heard of the cyber attack on Sony Pictures, allegedly from North Korea in retaliation for the Seth Rogen and James Franco farce “The Interview”. The entire corporation was caught up in this including detailed and damaging information on celebrities, intellectual property, privileged corporate information, current employees and former employees. There were 10 terabytes (about 10 trillion bytes) of information that was stolen. The damage is estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Information can be restored from backups and insurance is covering at least some of the losses. Sony can still do business, but this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Despite the news media trying to assess the damage in digital information and dollar losses, there is something much bigger going on here. I am not going to compare it to the Hindenburg, the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor or the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center because no physical lives were lost. However, I think the malicious nature of this attack has shaped the composition of cyber war.

Security experts agree that there was nothing Sony could have done to mitigate this hack. The lives of those caught in the attack will forever be changed. We fell into an emotional and psychological paralysis as a result of this. There are innumerable questions that may never be answered, such as how is this information going to be ultimately used. Who is going to be getting this information? One of the most frightening is what is going to keep this from happening again?

I don’t think there is any better illustration of the psychological and emotional paralysis that has happened to us than the total abdication of leadership that occurred during this attack. Theater chains left the release decision to the theater owners, Sony left the release decision to the theater chains, and ultimately the POTUS claimed that the decision to pull the film from release by Sony Pictures was “a mistake”. This is unusual for me to say, but I think the decision by Sony Pictures was the most responsible under the circumstances and the administration from the Pentagon through the President was unprepared to respond to this attack.

Retaliation for this attack is going to be difficult, at best. North Korea has no civil internet structure so a counterattack would be useless. They are so isolated that sanctions would be ineffective. Bolstering South Korea’s military capabilities would be a somewhat mild response. About the only thing I can think of is to either beam “Team America: World Police” to every TV set in North Korea or electronically disable all of North Korea’s military defenses.

All I can imagine is that this is only the first volley in a series.

[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
JEFFERSON CITY. Missouri guvnah Jay has sent a formal request to the badass state of Israel to help the lame state of Missouri to deal with the ongoing proto-civil-war that's spreading across the Pit-of-Hell, aka Ferguson. In a surprising move, Jay (whose surname bears an uncanny similarity to that of a former POTUS whose name is not to be named under any circumstances, lest his evil demon be summoned from the Netherworld where it belongs), has said that he's effectively bypassing Barack "Pontius Pilate" Obama who's never doing anything meaningful anyway, and is directly contacting the most badass experts in crowd control, namely the badass state of Israel.

"If we have to resort to asking Jews for help, then we're gonna do it", guvnah Jay was heard saying. "They've got decades of experience dealing with stone-throwing barbarians and burqa-wearing yelling fanatics. They use the same gear as our cops do, but unlike our cops, they actually know how to use it. So that can't end badly, can it?"

That must be causing a wave of orgasms among some circles, no doubt... )
[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Hello, fellow cringing sissies brave vigilantes! When most Americans think of the volunteer vigilante security neighborhood groups, probably the first name that comes to mind is George Zimmerman. No matter that his actions in that rainy evening in 2012 that led to the death of 17 y.o. Trayvon Martin may have little to do with the established practices and rules of action in those groups. Just on the contrary actually, it's exactly because in Zimmerman's case the circumstances and the mix of prejudices led to a tragic outcome, the case has turned into a symbol for the uncomfortable grey area between noble civic vigilance and taking the law in one's own hands.

The ensuing debate that grew like avalanche and the whole palette of controversial arguments somehow obscures the fact that the general tendency in the US has been going in the exact opposite direction. Due to the shrunken municipal budgets and the growing social and economic stratification in the American society, the civic watch groups have been going through a revival in recent years, their number steadily growing.


The parallels with the current situation in my country Bulgaria are rubbing themselves in our face, especially in recent days, when the problem with (mostly Roma) burglaries that has plagued huge chunks of the countryside, has reached a point where some voices have started insisting for starting a neighborhood patrol program similar to the US one. New "watch groups" are being formed by volunteers, especially in areas bordering on minority ghettos, and the situation may've started looking very similar to that in the US. But there are some significant differences. Like the fact that guns are almost absent from the Bulgarian populace, and the chance of a Zimmerman scenario is rather slim. Still, the enormous US experience in that area, and the ongoing debate in the US can't help but give a lot of food for thought to our people too, as well as some reasons for asking the question when are volunteer security groups efficient, and when the negative effects tend to outweigh the positive ones.

Because, outside the issue of Zimmerman's controversial motivations and the US gun laws which are generally seen as rather loose by most people at my side of the Big Water, there's also the issue of the thin line between civic vigilance and arbitrary overreach of power, which is actually pretty universal. It's a line that every volunteer group should be treading very carefully, wheter it's in Texas or, say, Plovdiv.

There sure are plenty of lessons we could be taking from the US )
[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Hi again, you benevolent dictators of this fictional utopian society of yours that you've probably already shaped beyond repair by taking a series of decisions in a number of ridiculously dichotomous situations, previously presented by Yours-truly. The following situation has been inspired by the NationStates game, where you're the guy one calling the shots (admit it, who wouldn't want that?) The last time the debate was about the sex and violence epidemic on late night television, and Ms Mikaela Boogeyman, the free-speech advocate won the poll by an overwhelming margin, arguing that the government needs to get the hell out of people's TV receivers, and allow the market to adapt to the needs of the customers/viewers. Ultimately, you've decided that it's all up to the parents. But now the situation is quite different. So here goes...

The Issue

A particularly bad spate of bombings, hijackings and snake attacks aboard airline flights has crippled the air travel industry in Insert Country Name. The government has convened to discuss possible ways of improving airport security.

The debate & a poll )
[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
"Ma'am, I think I saw a strange armed man coming through the schoolyard."
"You know what to do, my little ones. Shoot'em! Shoot'em now, kids!"
"Aw hell yeah!!!"

US schools weigh bulletproof uniforms: 'It's no different than a seatbelt in a car'
As gun control legislation grinds to halt in Washington, parents and teachers are taking matters into their own hands


"...Lined with ballistic material that can stop a 9mm bullet travelling at 400 metres per second, the backpack is only one of a clutch of new products making their way into US schools in the wake of Newtown school massacre. As gun control legislation grinds to halt in Washington, a growing number of parents and teachers are taking matters into their own hands.

...The Denver company that supplied Jaliyah's rucksack, Elite Sterling Security, has sold over 300 in the last two months and received inquiries from some 2,000 families across the US. It is also in discussion with more than a dozen schools in Colorado about equipping them with ballistic safety vests, a scaled-down version of military uniforms designed to hang in classroom cupboards for children to wear in an emergency.
"

You saw that coming, didn't you. )
[identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com
I was floored by a comment the other day in a thread with Jeff about the heavy handed response by federal, state, and local Law Enforcement regarding the recent criminal activity (note I did not use the word 'terrorist'). He seemed fine with it, generally dismissing it as 'justified, in this case'.

The most conservative among us is fine. Which means that perhaps most of you may be fine with it as well. This is not a personal attack on anyone, especially Jeff; just a barometer, a bellwether of tolerance to such things.

Which begs the question, when does crime fighting cross the line into lockdowns of cities, creating an atmosphere (if not a reality) of martial law?

Others wonder the same:

Read more... )

                                                                       

This, from a local respected political blogger:

caveat: he is a progressive )


The rest of their posts cover additional concerns of mine better than I can rant here.

In my opinion, I am concerned. When a country's enemy is invading, martial law is sometimes needed, otherwise GTFO. Worse, this is the first tangible proof that some of the blind conspiracy nuts found a squirrel with this militarization issue. We did not see this type local heavy reponse during wars, why now?

What's your opinion? Situation required this response because the entire city was in danger of ....pressure cookers? A guy with a gun? A couple of guys on the run, shooting cops? What is the difference between a gun and a (relatively) small bomb.
All I ask is you keep things in context with Boston, and not try to divert your opinions with example scenarios or blame Bush or Obama. This is about the people's acceptance of this, not some conspiracy question.

Has America really lost it's balls?

warning: massive image count under cut

I find this unacceptable )
Land of the Free™

ETA: for those who insist the lockdown was 'voluntary' I present this AP report.

[identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com
opinion/ This is why I do not call myself a LIBERAL

what. the. hell???

Have we turned into a nation of sheeple? Baaaaaaaaaa prooooooootecccctttttttttttt usssssssssssss from the littttttttttleee kniiiiiiiiivvvvvvvessssss.

As the TSA finally shows some common sense in priorities and resource allocation, flight attendants and various wetty pant's suddenly all 'have friends that were slit ear to ear on 9/11' by...um...scimitars?

this is so sickening and unacceptable. One of my dear friends, had her throat slit with a knife on flight 93!! How dare you put all us flight attendants back into danger by allowing knives back on the airplanes??? This is despicable that you would do this..it will make our airplanes less safe, and we want to have you reconsider this and throw it out. NO KNIVES and or any other weapons needed!!! PLEASE!

And then there is this jewel:

As flight attendant I find it ridiculous that you would allow an instrument that could lead to my death and many others on board a plane.

Do tell? Does business class still have metal eating utensils? How heavy is that coffee pot, and could it indeed be a deadly weapon if whooped up side your pumpkin head? Ball point pins in the neck! Belts and bras can strangle you! And then..there are those pesky 'emergency exits'...

Look.. sheeple.... listen to me!

I think that life is a risk.The whole war on terror was a joke, anyway. There was only one day of attack, and that was not really an 'attack' by an enemy, than a 'statement'. Most risk of this magnitude is acceptable. The no-fly list should be the next to go.

 If you don't like the risks of the job, no one is keeping you there but YOURSELF. /opinion



What do you think?
[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
There are entire towns in Russia with an access regime resembling that of concentration camps. Their residents don't have the right to host guests at home, except on some extraordinary occasions. There are currently 42 publicly acknowledged "closed cities" (as they're called) in Russia, with a total population of 1.5 million people. Most of them are administered by the Ministry of Defense, some by the Federal Atomic Energy Agency. There are allegedly another 15 closed cities around Siberia, but their location remains a state secret.


Take Ozyorsk for example. It's in the Chelyabinsk Oblast in the Urals, some 1600 km away from Moscow. The "Mayak" (Lighthouse) plant is located next to the town, where nuclear waste is being processed. In Soviet times the Mayak used to produce plutonium for the nuclear bombs of the Russkies. In 1957 a huge accident happened there, a container with 80 tons of radioactive waste exploded. Thousands of people across the Urals were evacuated, many subsequently died. Even today large portions of the mountain separating Europe from Asia are uninhabited. But that's not a story many people in the West have heard, although it was as serious as Chernobyl.

Living in "the box" )
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
In another illustration of how, given any sufficient length of time to develop any new technology, humans inevitably seek to develop its potential to harm others, especially other humans, cyberwarfare is becoming a topic not just for nerds but for US media as a whole. This all began with this:



http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/automated-toolkits-named-massive-ddos-attacks-against-us-banks-100212

A string of DDOS attacks on US banks, by as I understand it still undetermined leaders of these attacks. These things failed, but the scale and depth of the attacks took US leaders by surprise. The USA, however, does adhere to a policy that it is more blessed to give than to receive, and is carrying out these attacks, and noting this publicly (either hubris or simple stupidity, depending on which you prefer to believe) against Iran.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/world/middleeast/obama-ordered-wave-of-cyberattacks-against-iran.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

So with these two incidents as a starting point, it's worth considering a new aspect of this. The USA is preparing, evidently, to inaugurate more sophisticated use of cyberwarfare, presumably on a much larger scale than is currently ongoing against Iran:

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2012/1012/Pentagon-s-Plan-X-how-it-could-change-cyberwarfare

However in doing this, the Pentagon seems to have all the security and understanding of security in military terms of a sieve, as this article shows. What it shows is that the USA evidently is incapable of developing computer viruses and the like for this purpose without its authorship of them becoming known. Which in warfare is a really stupid move, as the concept of attacking an enemy ready and waiting for you makes only two people happy: the enemy and the local mortician.

The Pentagon's even noted its major target is, without any real surprise, China:

http://news.yahoo.com/u-cyber-warrior-accuses-china-targeting-pentagon-011916520.html

As to why this matters? This is a post to a site that's regularly had instances of downtime from DDOS attacks motivated by the eb and flow of politics in Russia, so the reason this matters is obvious: cyber warfare is going from inconvenience in some countries to a full-scale aspect of Internet use. This, coupled with things like the new attempts to impose new bills like the ones that produced that hue and outcry a while back and further attempts to break Internet neutrality means that the Internet may be unrecognizable in a few years from what it was.

If I had my druthers, I'd like to see an international treaty de-militarize the Internet in the same sense that space is de-militarized (even though the use of military satellites technically renders that treaty null and void), and enforced strongly. The Internet, whatever it is really for (it starts with p, ends with in, and has four letters), should not become the latest battleground for armies, as I see it. What do you think?
[identity profile] msmichelle.livejournal.com
So, I won't add fuel to the sour grapes fire regarding who won the debate Wednesday night.

Obama made his first post debate stop in my city, Paul Ryan's state. Transparent but not a big deal. There is a campaign to run here. What troubled me though was the elevation of security beyond anything I'd ever seen with a presidental visit. Hell, Obama was here a few years ago and it wasn't this crazy.

We, the taxpayers, funded this security, not his campaign. I guess I can see how that might be status quo. However, security provisions included, "if you are caught looking out a campus window (to get a glimpse), you will be contacted by police." Was this necessary? Schools were also closed down for the visit, among other things.

So, basically, we let our now slain ambassadors enter into dangerous situations (which, despite what the media initially reported was a clearly a terror based set up) with no security detail but a professor isn't allowed to look out her/his window to catch a glimpse of the hoopla in his own workplace setting?


Xposted
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-signs-defense-bill-despite-reservations-200818531.html

^That One BilllTM is now law. The President expressed severe reservations about it but still signed it into law anyway. To me if he really expressed reservations about it and did not want to object to it becoming law he could simply have refused to sign it or to return it and thus let it become law without his signature. Signing it indicates President Obama's objections to this as a law are a mite bit.....hypocritical. I also think that the practice of including provisions like this in bills where the overall thing includes other, necessary actions is one reason why there should be a constitutional amendment to permit a line-item veto. I also view the further extension of the government's coercive power since the first attempt at a Patriot Act in the 1990s to be a deplorable and worrying trend and hope we can all agree on that much. Your thoughts?
[identity profile] vuniper.livejournal.com
In Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states plainly: "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile." In wars between nations, detainees are referenced in the Fourth Geneva Convention. Yet now has come a time in which this has been counteracted...   

Now we have come to the term "unlawful combatant" associated w/ detained members of the Taliban & al-Qaeda the "enemies of 911" < if you believe that... > as well as "violent extremist affiliates" not involved in that war, and deemed them to be unlawful combatants. The members of the  U.S. Gov. had refered to captured enemy combatants as "detainees" because their lack of qualifications as prisoners of war under definition (by Geneva) but came to think of far better words to describe...

Which has led to the term enemy/ unlawful combatants being erased and further defined in the 2010 Defense Omnibus Bill:Section 948b. Military commissions generally: (a) Purpose-This chapter establishes procedures governing the use of military commissions to try alien unprivileged enemy belligerents for violations of the law of war and other offenses triable by military commission.      

I highly recommend the reading the link...


NDAA-Conference-Report-Detainee-Section:
http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/NDAA-Conference-Report-Detainee-Section.pdf

It seems now it is only all to easy to be a terrorist -  and they have 30 days to communicate changes ?  A lot can happen in 30 days . . .

We are in  a government overdue for reform which was expected by the forefathers . . .

"When all government, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the Center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." – Thomas Jefferson

( Read the wise words of presidents past more and listen... http://www.americanrevival.org/quotes/forefathers.htm)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031