POTUS visit
5/10/12 12:34So, I won't add fuel to the sour grapes fire regarding who won the debate Wednesday night.
Obama made his first post debate stop in my city, Paul Ryan's state. Transparent but not a big deal. There is a campaign to run here. What troubled me though was the elevation of security beyond anything I'd ever seen with a presidental visit. Hell, Obama was here a few years ago and it wasn't this crazy.
We, the taxpayers, funded this security, not his campaign. I guess I can see how that might be status quo. However, security provisions included, "if you are caught looking out a campus window (to get a glimpse), you will be contacted by police." Was this necessary? Schools were also closed down for the visit, among other things.
So, basically, we let our now slain ambassadors enter into dangerous situations (which, despite what the media initially reported was a clearly a terror based set up) with no security detail but a professor isn't allowed to look out her/his window to catch a glimpse of the hoopla in his own workplace setting?
Xposted
Obama made his first post debate stop in my city, Paul Ryan's state. Transparent but not a big deal. There is a campaign to run here. What troubled me though was the elevation of security beyond anything I'd ever seen with a presidental visit. Hell, Obama was here a few years ago and it wasn't this crazy.
We, the taxpayers, funded this security, not his campaign. I guess I can see how that might be status quo. However, security provisions included, "if you are caught looking out a campus window (to get a glimpse), you will be contacted by police." Was this necessary? Schools were also closed down for the visit, among other things.
So, basically, we let our now slain ambassadors enter into dangerous situations (which, despite what the media initially reported was a clearly a terror based set up) with no security detail but a professor isn't allowed to look out her/his window to catch a glimpse of the hoopla in his own workplace setting?
Xposted
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 17:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 18:15 (UTC)Oh no, of course you wont. And specifically, what sour grapes fire would that be again?
What troubled me though was the elevation of security beyond anything I'd ever seen with a presidental visit.
Yeah, those are old blues eh? Bush visited my city in 04. The SS lopped off the tops of all these trees to clear the view or something. The trees have still not recovered from the poor pruning. They never will.
the taxpayers, funded this security, not his campaign.
Yeah, fuck that, we should not waste money trying to avoid our president being killed! Defund the secret service!
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 20:25 (UTC)Sounds good to me. The guy wanted the job, he can take care of himself. Use some of his large salary to buy bodyguards if he wants them.
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 20:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 20:58 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 18:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 18:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 18:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:19 (UTC)"Russian Prime Minister and President-elect Vladimir Putin on Monday arrived at Moscow's Kremlin where he will be inaugurated as Russia's president, for a third term.
Putin was elected as president on March 4, 2012 in the first round, with 63.6 percent of the vote."
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:11 (UTC)As far as faces looking out of windows, the Texas Book Depository would like a word.
I don't think that's a terribly evenhanded description of Benghazi.
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:13 (UTC)Since when is Secret Service protection for the President a controversial issue?
(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:17 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 19:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 22:58 (UTC)What I see up north is people race baiting in ad hominem attack manner. I think we have predominately, as a country, moved on from the ooh, first black president thing...and I think Condi Rice, Mia Love and Colin Powel would agree.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 20:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 23:00 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 21:45 (UTC)If the Secret Service says it is necessary, then yes, it is necessary. They are in charge of security; they determine what protocols are issued.
Personally, I don't argue with the Secret Service.
we let our now slain ambassadors enter into dangerous situations (which, despite what the media initially reported was a clearly a terror based set up) with no security detail
Not the Secret Service's department. I direct you instead to the US Foreign Service. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Service) This department has been cutting security personnel and funding yearly, since Congress has been slashing their budget like mad for the past two years. (http://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2011/10/spending-bills-threaten-foreign-service-pay-and-hiring/35113/) Like most things in life, you get what you pay for. Congress went cheap on Foreign Service and Ambassador Stevens was the result of that.
But hey, we saved a few billion. I assume that is more of a priority for Congress then paying the right amount for the right results. *shrugs*
(no subject)
Date: 6/10/12 00:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/10/12 23:38 (UTC)And I'm pretty sure the security was a bit overboard, but we are talking about the first black president (or at least half-black, whatever, someone is going to argue this point...). The fact that there are people out there that are still violently racist towards people of color and joke about him not having anything in common with Kennedy "yet", means that threats against our current president's life can be very real.
But yeah, why is it so hard to kill the President, WTF?
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/12 05:50 (UTC)Tell your fellow conservatives to stop trying and threatening to kill him.
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/12 13:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: