[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Now that the Tea Party has taken the plunge to support racism in Arizona, the Party will have the obligatory split over policy. I see a division into two distinct Tea Parties: one of them based on black tea and the other based on green tea. The black Tea Party would continue to support racism (black represents the color of their heart). The green Tea Party will favor a more rational, natural approach to immigration.

What is your opinion of these two parties within the Party? Which other policy divisions can we look forward to?

(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dukexmachismo.livejournal.com
black represents the color of their heart)

The notion of using "blackhearted" to indicate "racist" causes me cognitive dissonance.


(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Since when is supporting enforcing an existing Federal law racist?

(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aintshesweet-x.livejournal.com
Oh great. ONE Tea Party is bad enough...

The Tea Party is ruining the Republican party. I'm a moderate Democrat, and there's a Tea Partier running for Senate in the Republican primary in my state, so I get a front row seat the the disaster. I don't even know what to think about the political mess in this country.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 02:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
Since the Tea Party is not yet a real Party with a clear idealogy, I would expect at least a twelve-way split... maybe more.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 03:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] headhouse.livejournal.com
I kinda hope we keep the tea-flavor theme going through any future divisions. Because then it maybe makes the democrats the coffee party, and third-party candidates have to go for other caffinated drinks, and really I just want to end up registering with the Jolt or mountain dew party.

Which might've had me voting for Cynthia McKinney if it'd happened a few years ago, but that's an acceptable risk.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 04:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prader.livejournal.com
I'm still holding out for the Long Island Ice Tea party division. Where we advocate everybody just getting the fuck along because we're having entirely too much fun not obsessing over the little things we don't like about each other.

They see you trollin', you be hatin'

Date: 17/5/10 04:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reality-hammer.livejournal.com
When will you stop beating children?

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 06:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
"(black represents the color of their heart)

protip: If you have to tell people what the symbolism is, it probably means you would've been better off just being straightforward.

But seriously, and I say this as someone who already has spoken at length in previous immigration posts on my opposition to this law, there's plenty more reason to believe it won't go beyond prejudice and bias, without hostile intent to subjugate an entire race. That doesn't make it less objectionable than if it were racist, but let's avoid diluting the word until its actually called for. Especially as I see the law not surviving long enough for it to evolve into anything worse than an exercise in prejudice.

We'll see, however.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 07:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainynights.livejournal.com
The black Tea Party would continue to support racism (black represents the color of their heart). The green Tea Party will favor a more rational, natural approach to immigration.


HAHAHAHA that made me laugh right there... Wait so a more rational, natural approach to immigration.. So like the bill that is currently being tossed around congress is what you mean right?

The bill that would give illegal aliens the right to not pay back taxes but get the earned income tax credit. The same bill that would give illegal aliens a jump in front of the ones who are trying to get here legally. The same bill that would allow people who have been deported to come here. The same bill that would have US the taxpayers paying for their lawyers. The very same bill that would basically give illegals the same rights as an American citizen. Is that what you mean by "rational and natural." Oh lets not also forget the same bill that would do away with our borders and lowers the fence from 800 miles to just a measly 200..

Yeah... oh and that is not me just saying that apparently lou dobbs agrees with me I know I was in shock too.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 10:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drcruel.livejournal.com
I don't think 2 parties is enough. There should also be an Earl Grey subdivision-they can favor racial profiling, but the police have to be real polite when they ask a brown person for their papers.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 13:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] light-over-me.livejournal.com
No, because the law isn't racist in the first place, and doesn't have provisions for racial profiling--and in fact prohibits it. It mirrors already existing federal law. Read it.

But keep on promoting racial and class warfare, and constantly calling everything racist. Keep on demonizing white folks, and the more you do, the more resentment white people will continue to feel as a result...

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 14:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com
The tea party is less a political movement and more a religion. As most religion, it will break apart due to the certainty of belief among the various participants.

When I hear of tea parties now, I get out the popcorn to watch a bunch of desperate idealogues self destruct.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 14:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] readherring.livejournal.com
There will be no split. The Tea Party is as nebulous as the so called 'Progressive' liberal movement, where everyone walks in with their own set of similar, yet diverse beliefs. Some TPers won't support the Arizona law, but I expect that most of them do not believe that it is a racist law, and won't feel the need to differentiate themselves from the law's supporters.