[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Now that the Tea Party has taken the plunge to support racism in Arizona, the Party will have the obligatory split over policy. I see a division into two distinct Tea Parties: one of them based on black tea and the other based on green tea. The black Tea Party would continue to support racism (black represents the color of their heart). The green Tea Party will favor a more rational, natural approach to immigration.

What is your opinion of these two parties within the Party? Which other policy divisions can we look forward to?

(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
and can't show any... other than vague quotes from amorphous sources...

(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
which has nothing to do with the fact that you're suggesting you know peoples' minds better than she does, and provide NO quotes from NO sources.

(no subject)

Date: 16/5/10 23:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Never said I did. I am merely pointing out that she can't speak for the majority that does.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Probably better than she can, but I am not saying I am, like she is.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
except for the part where you are.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
I will wait for your proof.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
no waiting. just scroll up.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
scrolling up -- ur doin' it wrongz.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 00:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
I see your brain scans came back.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 01:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dukexmachismo.livejournal.com
Can I nominate this for a daily quote?

I mean, seriously, it pretty much encapsulates so much of current political discourse.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 01:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Whatever makes your day a little brighter, I'm for it.

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 06:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Hehehe. Well it surely *is* funny, and describes the political discourse today, but i'm afraid it'll spill off the screen if quoted in its entirety (i mean the whole exchange). Nevertheless, funny funny funny! :D

(no subject)

Date: 17/5/10 01:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
LMAO. This is too funny.

here's a little... now your turn

Date: 17/5/10 00:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
"Obviously not," Brewer replied. "You know Arizona has been under terrorist attacks, if you will, with all of this illegal immigration that has been taking place on our very porous border. […] The whole issue comes back, that we do not and will not tolerate illegal immigration bringing with it very much so the implications of crime and terrorism into our state."

Republican governor, Jan Brewer


This is hyperbole.

Rep. Pearce, R-Mesa, said during an interview on “Morning Edition” on KJZZ (91.5 FM) that he would support bringing back a controversial federal program dubbed “Operation Wetback,” which was designed to apprehend and deport illegal Mexican immigrants in the mid-1950s.

“We know what we need to do,” Pearce said on the radio show. “In 1953, Dwight D. Eisenhower put together a task force called ‘Operation Wetback.’ He removed, in less than a year, 1.3 million illegal aliens. They must be deported.”

State Rep. Russell Pearce (Who introduced the bill)


The bill was written by Kris Kobach, he thinks that today's immigrants will "divide the United States into two peoples, two cultures, two languages."

Re: here's a little... now your turn

Date: 17/5/10 02:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
It's not hyperbole. Have you even looked at how much the crime rate (and just random crimes but kidnappings and murders) has risen in AZ in the past couple years, most of which is due to the illegals?

Re: here's a little... now your turn

Date: 17/5/10 02:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
Although Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and others have defended it, Phoenix Police Chief Jack Harris suggested it's at best superfluous in terms of helping local law enforcement combat serious crime and at worst a diversion of resources to enforcing federal immigration law.

"Proponents of this legislation have repeatedly said that the new law provides a tool for local law enforcement, but I don't really believe that that's true or accurate," Harris said at an April 30 news conference. "We have the tools that we need to enforce laws in this state to reduce property crime and to reduce violent crime, to go after criminals that are responsible for human smuggling, to go after criminals that are responsible for those home invasions, kidnappings, robberies, murders."

Judith Gans, who manages the Immigration Policy Program at the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy at the University of Arizona, said predictions that crime will drop because of the law are "really overstated." While Mexican drug- and human- smugglers pose an ongoing threat, most illegal immigrants try to avoid causing problems once in the United States, she said.

"There are lots of studies that have confirmed that immigrants, and especially undocumented immigrants, are far less likely to commit crimes than the general population," Gans said.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2010/05/16/20100516immigration-law-arizona-claims.html#ixzz0o9LEm0oP


1) Has the crime rate gone up? In what sense?
2) Is illegal immigration the "cause" ?
3) The problem with drugs is separate from immigration. Conflating the two is not going to help us get to the root of the problem.

Re: here's a little... now your turn

Date: 17/5/10 09:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
The people coming over the border illegally bring drugs with them, more often than not (not necessarily willingly). Doing something to reduce incentive for people to come over will help reduce that source. Illegal immigration does not mean that everyone coming over is just looking for work. There are plenty of people who are criminals coming over too. Regardless, the point of the law isn't to reduce crime directly.

Re: here's a little... now your turn

Date: 17/5/10 21:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reality-hammer.livejournal.com
Except that 100% of illegal immigrants are already breaking the law.

Oops.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031 

Summary