Two Tea Parties
16/5/10 15:57![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Now that the Tea Party has taken the plunge to support racism in Arizona, the Party will have the obligatory split over policy. I see a division into two distinct Tea Parties: one of them based on black tea and the other based on green tea. The black Tea Party would continue to support racism (black represents the color of their heart). The green Tea Party will favor a more rational, natural approach to immigration.
What is your opinion of these two parties within the Party? Which other policy divisions can we look forward to?
What is your opinion of these two parties within the Party? Which other policy divisions can we look forward to?
(no subject)
Date: 16/5/10 23:37 (UTC)The motivations are based in xenophobia.
That's why you also see people passing "English only" laws. This is about defining the national identity not politically but culturally-- and these people think it matters since they think that any other, any non-white culture is inferior--
(no subject)
Date: 16/5/10 23:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/5/10 23:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/5/10 23:42 (UTC)An example.
Date: 16/5/10 23:46 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 16/5/10 23:48 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 16/5/10 23:50 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 16/5/10 23:53 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 16/5/10 23:59 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 00:01 (UTC)Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 00:08 (UTC)This is also why you should learn Spanish.
I don't see a problem with English as the national language.
I think it's pretty pointless. English is what works now but in 100 years it may be French. Who knows? Who cares? Why make a law to enforce it? The people will decide with their tongue.
Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 06:24 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 01:03 (UTC)Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 01:36 (UTC)Also see this:
http://www.southernstudies.org/2010/02/tea-party-dabbles-in-immigration-politics.html
Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 02:27 (UTC)I take the above as there being no hard numbers and your claims of vast majorities which are kinda the foundation of the whole argument being nothing but assumptions again.
Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 02:28 (UTC)Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 02:30 (UTC)Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
From:Re: An example.
Date: 17/5/10 06:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 17/5/10 00:02 (UTC)Yea...nevermind the 10-15% illegal immigrants in the state...
(no subject)
Date: 17/5/10 01:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 17/5/10 03:27 (UTC)Arizona's population was just north of 6 million at that time. That makes it actually about a 12th or 8-9%. Sorry, I was a little high.
(no subject)
Date: 17/5/10 02:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 17/5/10 02:20 (UTC)source?
Date: 17/5/10 02:22 (UTC)That's nation-wide, do you have different data for AZ. Though, some Hispanics are white, or at least that's how they show up on the census.
Re: source?
Date: 17/5/10 09:00 (UTC)It's estimated that 30% of AZ's population is Hispanic. I can't find that anyone's done a specific poll of AZ, but I had seen news articles previously that had stated this. Google seems to just want to return stuff about the national opinion.