![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
What are the odds that this gets a LOT worse by the traditional spring time offensive season when a young general's fancy turns to invasion?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 12:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:16 (UTC)Never mind the confusion. Cue the sarcastic macros.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:19 (UTC)imposeintroduce it to all Koreans doesn't seem very democratic to me, how do you think? Sure, DPRK has "Democratic" in its name, but so does DR Congo, so...(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:23 (UTC)North Koreans acknowledged that juche might not be appropriate for other countries, but they claim it provides a moral and philosophical basis that is highly appropriate for Korean society, given the history and culture of that country. North Korea does not seek to impose juche on any other country, but they also wish to be left alone to implement it in the DPRK without outside or foreign influence. The fact that they lack outside influence makes the concept of juche extremely incompatible with globalisation, seeing as its main driving force would be foreign trade. (http://socyberty.com/issues/north-korea-and-anti-globalization/)
I think you fail.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:54 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 14:31 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 17:53 (UTC)So, firing into the ocean is a provocation for firing on people?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 14:25 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 17:22 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 14:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:14 (UTC)This is going to put pressure on China for their relationship. China has already been dragging their feet diplomatically about doing anything about N. Korea. China does not want to be pressured, which means this is going to strain ties with china really badly. China is the only reason N. Korea still exists.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:22 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 16:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 23:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:29 (UTC)The latter.
Date: 23/11/10 16:36 (UTC)Plus paving the way for Kim-the-third.
Besides, if DPRK gets too out of hand the Chinese will help the rest of the world turn them into pink mist.
Question being, at what point does China (and thus everyone else) step in? My guess is after it's too damn late.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 17:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 18:25 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: