![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
What are the odds that this gets a LOT worse by the traditional spring time offensive season when a young general's fancy turns to invasion?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 13:52 (UTC)What if the people of South Korea will conclude that they want to drive Juche way one day? Democracy is just a buzzword with no real contents behind it for me.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 14:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 14:34 (UTC)Indeed, it is. So why are you saying:
"All they want is to unite all Koreans under true democratic JUCHE idea."
Shouldn't this go both ways? I mean what if South Koreans don't want to be like North Korea, without having to be told by anyone else to think this way? Have you talked to any actual South Koreans on this issue, or you're just drawing conclusions from between your fingers?
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:15 (UTC)At the opposite POV, I don't know what South Koreans want. I can't imagine they want DPRK should be occupied too. Integrate broken families -- yes. Occupy the whole Korean peninsula -- no.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 15:19 (UTC)No-one wants to occupy North Korea right now. Everyone just wants them to stop acting like insane drunken teens.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 20:37 (UTC)dollarlegitimate currency like a ruble that most North Koreans would like food, shelter and maybe a nice show like Graham Norton to watch on the telly.(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 22:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 04:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:10 (UTC)Ever heard of brainwashing? And/or fear of political persecution?
I think you have. Given your apparent origin.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:14 (UTC)I'm learning to handle it inside this community as well.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 15:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 16:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 16:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 16:46 (UTC)We used to have that here.
We remember!
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 17:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 17:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 18:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 19:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 20:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 20:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/10 22:20 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:06 (UTC)Is Barak Obama a legally chosen President?
Did he perform all of pre-elections obeys?
Is it true that the most (who voted for Obama) of the America people want to collapse their country? I think not. So why you have elected a man who's running to collapse? Is there any guarantee that the next elections will drive the American nation away from collapse?
BTW, DPRK (according to Wikipedia) also have had an elections in 1998, 2005 and 2008
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:16 (UTC)Are you contending that the last presidential elections were, by chance, rigged, therefore illegitimate? That's some pretty huge conspiracy we're talking here. Got some evidence? We're about facts here, right?
Obeys? Didn't get that part too well. I assume you meant promises. Well, that's a problem. Does any politician ever fulfill 100% of their promises? What do they do promises for, during elections?
Returning to Kim - he says he'll bring prosperity to his people. Has he done it? And if not, who would hold him accountable for failing on his promises, and more importantly, how? Is that possible at all, since he holds all power tools in his country?
Is there ever a guarantee for what would or would not happen in the future? Who can guarantee the future?
And let me guess. 100% of everybody voted for dear Kim. Right? Everybody just adores him so much they're afraid to even question him why they're so poor and starving. Love is crazy, isn't it?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 22:22 (UTC)We used to have that here.
We remember!
Rich men may have had it, everyone else, not so much.