fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
When a President said that the Constitution didn’t apply to him and his cult, and encouraged armed insurrection, why wouldn’t we expect copycats?

Massachusetts police ID suspects in armed highway standoff

Did not know about these folks before today. From another source:

"The group, self-identified as the Rise of the Moors, live-streamed its standoff on Saturday on its YouTube page, in which its leader, identified on the group’s website as Jamhal Talib Abdullah Beym, said the group is “not anti-government” and was being “extra careful” not to violate the federal laws of the United States.

Two group members held a Moroccan flag throughout the exchange, a tenet of the Pawtucket, Rhode Island-based group’s ideology. The flag stems from the the largely Black group’s belief that “a 1787 treaty (fictitious) between the United States and Morocco grants them immunity from U.S. law,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center."

Hmmm. I'm sure the "I don't recognize your laws" will go over well with the judge.

Besides. There is a 1787 treaty with Morocco, the first country that recognized us, but I don’t think it says what they think it says.

Also, the territory they claim they lived in at the time (which they didn't) wasn't part of the US, but would have been part of New France prior to the Louisiana Purchase, so even if there was a treaty between the US & Morocco (which there wasn't), it wouldn't cover them. There would need to have been a treaty between Morocco and the French Republic (which there wasn't), which would have been null & void when Napoleon took over anyhow, and would have been doubly void when the territory was sold to the US.

Oh, and if this group believes it has “immunity from US law,” then why were they being “extra careful to not violate any federal laws of the United States?” Seems like a group of contradictory attention seekers to me.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/21 18:57 (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
The arguments of the "Rise of the Moors" people will, I agree, not go over at all with the judge(s) assigned to handle their case. This might make for entertaining spectacle for observers.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/21 19:39 (UTC)
kara_mckay: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kara_mckay
Sovereign citizen groups of one sort or another have been around for quite a while, but they usually only pop up in the mainstream news as a sort of comic relief. People really need to start taking them seriously. It's really only a matter of time before one of these groups of idiots decides they're justified in killing people over their imaginary right to travel or their interpretation of the Articles of Confederation or the Magna Carta or some other such bullshit.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/21 12:09 (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mikeyxw
if this group believes it has “immunity from US law,” then why were they being “extra careful to not violate any federal laws of the United States?”

Because it's a lot more fun to argue about how you're a sovereign citizen and immune from the laws of the United States among a group of similarly drunk and high friends than trying to use it as a legal defense. There does seem to be something about the mythology of the US that encourages this kind of revolutionary cosplay among a certain number of its citizens.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30