airiefairie: (Default)
[personal profile] airiefairie

Admit it. You've all seen it already. People have been going crazy about Bernie's mittens. But the greatest part is, he has capitalised on the hype, and raised money for charity out of it. Lots of money. Sanders' mitten creator is making socks inspired by the famous meme, and the proceeds go to hunger-fighting charities. $1.8M so far, and counting.

Some of the memes )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
So, Biden puts Neera Tanden, the biggest, most aggressive Bernie Sanders critic in the US, on his team. Specifically at the OMB while Sanders is Senate Budget Committee ranking/chair. Coincidence?

With Tanden Choice, Democrats Stick it to Sanders Voters

Say what you will about Bernie Sanders. He does seem a bit out of touch with the real world, and in the real world he could enact policies that are well meant but don't work. He might also turn out to be a weak leader. Bernie calls himself a socialist but he is just an old hippie democrat from 1968 full of lofty ideals and a Woody Guthrie view of the workingman's blues. It's noble ground but not altogether practical. However, he does what he believes is right, speaks what he thinks is the truth, and shows his genuinity through his standing consistently for his principles with unwavering conviction over the course of several decades.

Problem is, these things directly oppose the DNC, or any partisan establishment to that matter - so he is their enemy #1, and he has suffered politically at the hand of their corruption as much as anyone. He's an infinitely bigger man than most of those guys. But this is what he gets for affiliating with and trusting establishment politicians. The system just grinds you, chews you and spits you out like an old meat chop. They aren't like you Bernie. They don't care and they don’t have morals.

As for the bigger picture. Too bad the DNC power-brokers are choosing to take a dump on a whole section of their electorate. This will definitely come back to bite them on the ass in the long run.
kiaa: (Default)
[personal profile] kiaa
With the current situation in the United States, and with millions of citizens begging for government to save humanity, seems that Bernie's philosophy is poised on the launchpad and ready to make fundamental changes to America. And here, just when history has opened the door for him, he bails.

Bernie Sanders drops out of the presidential race

Should be interesting to see some new polls now.

I'm a little surprised that it happened so early, but I'm sure many, including at his side of the political barricade, would argue it was the right thing for him to do.

Now it's all up to a good guy who unfortunately displays signs of dementia vs a horrible sociopathic megalomaniac.
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro

Bernie Sanders has won the Nevada caucuses, and is now leading the Dem primaries in terms of delegates who'll be ultimately choosing their nominee in November. As we know, Bernie heavily relies on grassroots support, and looks likely to achieve what he failed to do back in 2016.

Now, he may've won 47% of the vote in Nevada, but that only gives him 13 delegates because of the state's small population size. There's one more primary in February, the one in South Carolina, and the forecast is about a tight race between Sanders and Biden. That'll be Biden's last chance to prove he's still got some steam in his campaign, after the failures in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada, where he was soundly defeated by both Sanders and Buttigieg.

Read more... )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
Bernie Sanders has made more than $1.75 million from book royalties since 2016 — here's what we know about his wealth and assets

He's a millionaire, so what. He's a millionaire who does release his taxes. Does that bother anybody that he's a socialist millionaire? Here are my thoughts.

1. The issue is not how much money a candidate has but where it came from. Who are they tied to? Was it legal? That's the main issue.

2. Does having a large sum of money impact a candidate's policies? In other words, are the candidate's policies self-serving? Have his policies changed as he became wealthier?

3. He's a rock star within the political world. His books and speeches will earn him money. Lots of it. Better that than big money from Wall Street, corporations and foreign business investors to whom he owes favors. Now as a politician in office, Bernie is not allowed to get paid for speeches. He can do books though, can't he?

4. Bernie's policies do not appear to have changed at all as he has made more money.

Read more... )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
Bernie Sanders will go to Puerto Rico instead of Women's Convention

But wait, let me get this straight, some crazy assholes gave him all kinds of shit for being *invited* to that thing (in place of women who rejected their own invitations)...

Now those same people are giving him shit for NOT going!?

Methinks some are just bitter hags taking out their own failures on somebody else.

Why should anyone be mad he isn't going to speak? He never should have been invited in the first place. Bernie folks seem to be all bent out of shape. Not speaking may be the smartest thing Bernie has actually done. I'm sure there are scads of brown Americans in Puerto Rico who would love to hear from the one of the whitest Senators in Congress all about the joys of single payer healthcare, evil billionaires, and free stuff.
[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
The inevitable is about to happen (some have falsely reported that it has happened already), and Bernie is going to endorse Hillary, in order to, as he vowed, defeat Trump at any cost. So some of his supporters are now turning the "bern" on him. And in quite a hostile way:

http://www.forwardprogressives.com/some-bernie-sanders-supporters-now-turning-on-him/

Reading some of those posts, I see people who seem to have wrapped their whole identity in their unrealistic ideal of who Sanders is and what he stands for - or even how politics and the world is supposed to work. It's no different than reading the thoughts of cult members. Their magical thinking goes beyond support for a political candidate and feels more like desperate people seeking some kind of personal meaning and validation. It's also emotionally and intellectually immature. I feel for these people - they'll never find any person or any cause pure enough to fix whatever they need to be repaired within them. It's the only thing I can think of that would account for such absolute blind rage and feelings of betrayal.

A nation so divided, even within the same political camp that is supposed to seek unity and work together towards a common goal, should not expect anything good in the future.
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Well, seems like Bernie is now playing by the old well-known tune that DC deserves becoming a separate US state in its own right. With all the implications that a 51st state would have on federal law (and the extra star that'll have to be added to the star-spangled banner).

3 days before D.C. primary, Sanders calls for statehood

What a shock, what a surprise, eh? LOL. And here I thought Bernie was more subtle a player. But then again, he can't help but get really desperate at this point. So he'll do what? Exactly. Pander Hillary-style for votes.

That said, I wonder what the capital city of that proposed new state would be. Can you even have a state that consists of a single city? (A city-state? Hehe). Apart from the pandering side of the issue, it's still kind of curious what implications having a 51st state would have, be it DC or Puerto Rico, or any state potentially splitting in two (or more, like California).

My thoughts? Just merge the damn thing with Maryland, and be done with it. Flag problem solved. You're welcome, America!
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
While I don't necessarily agree with lumping all Sanders supporters into a nasty pot and framing them as sexist, mysogynist, even racist bullies who do not tolerate anyone else's position and opinion, there *must* be something wrong with the way many among them have been treating pluralism:

'I've been silent': Harvard's Clinton backers face life on a pro-Bernie campus

Seems like that not supporting not just "isn't cool" around liberal university campuses, it comes with a full package of extras. Being labeled a fascist is just one among many bonuses. I can imagine lots of folks in that situation might prefer to stay in the closet - until something snaps and they decide they've had enough, and figure the best way to handle this is to "come out".

Or this could just be part of a Hillary tactic of using the media to instill doubts in Sanders' credibility, for all I know. Admittedly, the cynical me instantly suspected a hit-piece on Bernie. Or is it?

On the other hand... )
[identity profile] foolsguinea.livejournal.com
I thought I might write more pro-Bernie pieces the last week or two, and I haven't. At this point, I don't expect to change many minds before Tuesday.

I think Bernie Sanders is what Democrats pretend to be when they want voters to turn out. Not in every election, even, just the ones they've decided they want to win for once, which is much less than half of them.
cut for length )
I hope he will be more moderate on nuclear power, which is at least largely containable pollution. If he's not, well, after Fukushima, I understand. But I want a President who is anti-fracking. I do.

And I want a President who wants a living wage. And a President who proposes an FTT. We can compromise on some things. I just want him to be on the side that wants a better life, less pollution, and less destruction.

If you are able to vote in a (USA) Democratic Party primary, I would like you to consider voting for Bernie Sanders.
[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
A tweet from Bernie Sanders:

"The corporate media counted us out. The pollsters said we were way behind. But we won. Thank you, Michigan."

Now, how he managed to pull off such a huge upset in a state that the "corporate media" as he calls them had already given to Hillary - that I leave to the better versed in US politics.

Read more... )
[identity profile] foolsguinea.livejournal.com
Jimmy Carter was the first US President I remember. I still like & respect Jimmy Carter, even though in hindsight he didn't really continue the successful economic policies of previous Democrats, and he didn't stop the imperialist activities of the USA in Latin America.

I can like someone while recognizing that they have glaring flaws among their good points. I bring this up because it's relevant to how we look at Barack Obama. Obama is likeable, and he's cool, and his presidency is important to a lot of people--and his foreign policy team is crap. Total crap.

War in Libya with the opposition of Congress--are we playing at being Dick Nixon & Henry Kissinger now?
Trying to depose Assad via the ragtag Free Syrian Army, and probably contributing to the Syrian refugee crisis--instead of offering food aid when Syria was in a five-year drought and a killer famine, possibly thawing relations with Assad, and averting the refugee crisis.
And both of the above empowered "Islamic State." Lovely.
Assassinating Muslim preacher Anwar al-Awlaki. Then assassinating his teenage son. Obama flak-catcher then saying, "Should've had a better dad!" Class act. e_e
The "double tap" drone policy which attacks first responders after an assassination strike, not to mention that our foreign policy relies on assassination strikes at all.
America apparently completely blowing the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009? I don't know as much about this one.

All of this happened when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. I'm not giving John Kerry a free pass. I'm just saying, if she wants to run on this record, I'm not seeing enough positives to outweigh negatives. It's not really a great record on the merits.

Then she stood in front of a bunch of Democratic primary voters and invoked Henry Kissinger as someone who approved of her state department. Um, OK, you can take a compliment from a predecessor, but trumpeting that is odd. Do you even know where you are, lady? Republicans might accept that endorsement; I grew up Republican, and I think we sort of knew Kissinger was a supervillain, but he was our supervillain. In front of a bunch of liberal US Democrats? Uhhh, no.

Bernie isn't perfect. Drone attacks will probably continue under him in some form. But I think I'd rather take a chance on his foreign policy than on hers. Of course, that's easy to say, given that I tend to agree with him on other issues.

Tulsi Gabbard's endorsement of Bernie yesterday makes me think I'm onto something. Hillary Clinton was a bad Secretary of State who backed foolish policies that caused problems for other countries, including our European allies. And to no advantage to our country.

She has not earned the respect her resumé would imply. And at least Bernie isn't looking to Kissinger as a mentor and role model.

Just one of the reasons I am asking you to vote for Bernie Sanders in your state's Democratic primary.
[identity profile] rob515.livejournal.com
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] rob515 at Bernie's Health

The Clinton campaign has gone after Sanders by trying to plant doubts about his ability to serve as President, due to his health. I don't know about Bernie's health, but I have great concerns about his age.

I have other doubts as well. I ask if someone as far left as he appears to be, could ever win in places like the Midwest and the South. I don't think he has much of a chance. As far as being President is concerned, with all his angry screaming about the inequality in the country and the piracy of big business and corporations (things, which incidentally I agree with), I don't think he would make much headway with a Congress that is likely to be Republican dominated.

Bernie Sanders reminds me of Ralph Nader, the destoyer of Democratic Candidates, and the on of the main reasons that George Bush got into office, and Al Gore lost. Bernie will never win the votes of most people in this country, but like Ralph Nader, whose supporters blissfully believed that they would buck all odds, Bernie's followers will lead us into the pits, but as they do so, they will be cheering wildly. A vote to make him our candidate is the surest way to assure that Donald Trump, or maybe worse yet Ted Cruz will be our President.

Sure, what Sanders preaches makes sense, but the chances of his getting his agenda through congress are exactly null. Even Democrats in Congress may not support his agenda. As far as the health issue is concerned, Bernie is currently 74 years old. That would make him 75 by the time he is inaugurated. If he is lucky enough to get through his first term and was elected a second time, that would make him 83 by the time he left office. I really can't think of someone in his 80's having enough energy to cope with the hostile complexities that surround us these days. The likelihood that he would become non-functional while in office is great, and who we are voting in as Vice-President may next hold the office. Clinton would be 76 by the time she finished her 2 terms – merely 2 years older than Sanders is now.

If the world suddenly turned into a fantasy land, Bernie would be my choice for President. But as things are, I figure that despite some of her faults, faults which the press has so gleefully broadcast, I think she would make an excellent President. I think she has a far better chance of being alive at the end of her 2 terms, and a much better chance of challenging the vicissitudes of the modern world.

[identity profile] rob515.livejournal.com
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] rob515 at Democratic Debate

And so, the third Democratic Debate has taken place. Although many hopeful Republicans were hoping that Hillary and Bernie would go after each other, fangs and claws ready to rip each other apart – a scene that could easily be imagined in a Republican debate, featuring that master of insult and chaos Donald trump – no such episode occurred. Bernie simply apologized to Hillary, she accepted, and they both resolved to go on to other, more important issues; issues like the uneven distribution of wealth, realistic tactics for dealing with Isis, gun control, racial profiling and the demonization of all Muslims, and education. Nobody called anybody else stupid or weak or ugly. They simply stood with the issues.

It is very unlikely that I would ever vote for one of the current Republican candidates, but I respect true conservatism, and would really like to hear a discussion by well informed men and women about where they would take the country. Instead, we are destined to hear endless statements like the pyramids being built to store Joseph's grain, how we should all buy guns and shoot each other, and how stupid, or ugly, or weak all the other candidates on the stage are. Republican community—GET A LIFE!

[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
First, the question. Then some remarks.

[Poll #2020579]

As for context, first a disclaimer. The RCP average still puts Hillary 30%+ above Sanders as of now. Still, it's notable that Sanders beats Walker by 6-7 pts, depending if all voters or just likely voters are counted. In a general election, that sounds quite the landslide margin - and it could be construed as a sign that the Sanders surge is more than just a surge against Trump, but it actually makes Bernie competitive to most GOP candidates. Or that might only be wishful thinking - so feel free to lambast this supposition.

Read more... )

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 272829 3031