[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Which US President presided over one of the most infamous racially motivated incarcerations of US citizens in the country's history, for which he is ironically lauded by the opposition that hated him then? Which US President willingly sent Soviet dissidents to certain death at the hands of Stalin's death squads? Which US President successfully hid the effects of a major disease with the collaboration of the US Media? Which US President assumed the most wide-ranging power of any POTUS in the country's history, shamelessly breaking one of the oldest precedents, forcing US soldiers to go fight foreign wars against an enemy who really was none of our business in imperialism against a people that appointed an unpleasant megalomaniac, but he was the problem of that part of the world? Which President used a new and insidious means of communication to spread his shameless propaganda into our HOMES? 

Which President was it that shamelessly violated the letter and the spirit of Neutrality Acts passed by the Congress representing the Silent Majority of the American People who weren't in the least bothered by what the aforementioned megalomaniac was doing? Which President yielded to dangerous radicals who exploited without shame a war against that self-same megalomaniacal radical for purely selfish ends? Which US President was it under whom the US government assumed a power that it had never before considered remotely valid, only to extend these immoral and unjust expansions, including (horror of horrors) lifting a dirt-poor mountainous region out of the Stone Age (I kid, but barely) to that most evil and immoral of things, the draft? Under which US President was the HUAC led by a Soviet spy?

The answer is beneath the cut:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt

Now, this is the problem with pointing out that Reagan of propaganda-bordering-on-myth is not really the Reagan of real life. This is very much a valid point, but the patron saint of the progressive-liberal state did a lot of things that most modern liberals consider among the most immoral aspects of US society, such as acceptable use of strategic bombing, beginning the Manhattan Project, interning Japanese only on the mainland foreknowing that there was nothing but racism in it (as opposed to the Germans and Italians who actually were pro-Nazi), edit he also was POTUS when HUAC took its full form as a standing Congressional Committee, while expanding the US government's political power in ways that while necessary were entirely unprecedented. Similarly he was an undeclared member of the Allied Powers from 1940 which was very much violations of international law then and now.

So, I'm going to ask a simple question: As it's pretty much a given that Reagan, as an actual human being as opposed to a monomanical ideologue did not match his ideology, what does the real record of Franklin Delano Roosevelt mean? Would it be fair to say that he's actually not that much of a Progressive any more than Reagan was a zealous Conservative?

One more thing:

Remember when Reagan was responsible for losing the Cold War?

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE5DD163FF934A25752C0A96E948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 03:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com
Tiny gripe: how did FDR establish a Congressional committee?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 03:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 14:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 16:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 12:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 14:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 16:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 18:06 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 08:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 12:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Absolutely. But there is no one less deserving of the accolades he gets than FDR.

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 03:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
Be sure to bring it up when people are slavishly using his birthday as a big PR push next time.

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 03:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Maybe Underlankers can take a field trip up to Hyde Park, and stomp on FDR's grave site, or something.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 03:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 04:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 03:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Do you know what I'd like explained: Why are there Civil War re-enactors? I mean they lost, right?

I can't imagine the equivalent, though it would be pretty funny to participate in a Custer's Last Stand re-enactment.
Edited Date: 10/2/11 03:58 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 04:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Lots of Northern folks are participants in that stuff too. Ain't just Southern folk. I grew up near Williamsburg Virginia, and there were a lot of New York plates near some of the battle fields.
Edited Date: 10/2/11 04:04 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 04:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com
Why are there Civil War re-enactors? I mean they lost, right?

Terrorists gotta learn how to make big bangs some place don't they?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 06:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 04:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com
Pretty much for the same reason there are re-enactors for everything. WW2, WW1, Civil War, Revolutionary War, Napoleonic War, Regency, Roman - I've seen just about every type. Most of them do it because they're huge history buffs and they play different roles depending on the year.

As for a re-enactment of Custer's Last Stand, your wish is my command. Mecca lecca hi, mecca hiney ho. (http://www.custerslaststand.org/)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 07:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 07:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 08:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] paedraggaidin.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 07:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 07:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] paedraggaidin.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 07:25 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 09:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 09:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 20:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com - Date: 11/2/11 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 11/2/11 07:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 09:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 16:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] langostino.livejournal.com
. . . really? Civil War reenactment is perceived as a Lost Cause sort of thing?

I mean there's definitely some of that to it, but I wouldn't say it dominates. And somebody's got to play the Union. . .

Reagan vs FDR

Date: 10/2/11 04:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
To be fair, in all my 5 years in America, I'm yet to see FDR on buttons with a halo, stuck to hundreds of bizarre individuals on a "spontaneous rally".

Re: Reagan vs FDR

Date: 10/2/11 09:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
Yes, you can parse out a specific expression of devotion as unique to one political clique or another, but that's missing the point because blind devotion takes all kinds of forms. Does that somehow make one expression of it worse than another, or perhaps is there more wisdom in taking note how blind devotion is pretty much bad in principle and that it's unhealthy regardless of political affiliation?

Hair splitting in this case does not reveal anything of much use. "Yeah, but they do it worse just sounds all to much like "but he did it first".

Re: Reagan vs FDR

Date: 10/2/11 09:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
It's been long enough. You also don't see Nixon like that any more either.

Re: Reagan vs FDR

Date: 10/2/11 13:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com
I know what you mean. I keep seeing those buttons of obama with a halo everywhere.

Re: Reagan vs FDR

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 16:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Reagan vs FDR

From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 17:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Reagan vs FDR

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 17:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Reagan vs FDR

From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 17:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Reagan vs FDR

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 17:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 06:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] headhouse.livejournal.com
Is it bad that I heard that whole first paragraph in the voice of the guy who does movie trailers?

"In a world... that they did not create... two people..." etc.

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 09:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
This Summer, coming to theatres near you:

UNDERLANKERS: Verbosity

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 09:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
interning Japanese only on the mainland foreknowing that there was nothing but racism in it (as opposed to the Germans and Italians who actually were pro-Nazi)

There are some Germans in Texas that would like to speak to you about your historical revisionism.
http://www.gaic.info/internment_camp.html

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 15:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 16:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 17:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com - Date: 11/2/11 08:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 14:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anadinboy.livejournal.com
and fdr murdered huey long!

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 15:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
there is so much wrong with this post i don't even know where to begin to start, so i won't. all of it is bad.

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 16:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] montanaisaleg.livejournal.com
I think it's fair to say that all presidents have their records distorted to support whatever agenda people want to support. Since Reagan was around more recently, we hear much more about him than we do about FDR, but I think it would be hard to find a president whose popular image accurately reflects his actual accomplishments and/or screw-ups.

I'm going to cherry pick a couple items from your list that confuse me a bit. First.. Beginning the Manhattan Project is considered "among the most immoral aspects of US society" by modern liberals? Certainly the use of the atom bomb could be considered immoral, depending on the circumstances/reasons, but I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone say that it was immoral to start the project that developed the atom bomb.

Second.. Strategic bombing is considered immoral? I can certainly see how some aspects of it are (fire bombing of Dresden, for example), but bombing an enemy's factories, railways, roads, bridges, etc is an entirely legitimate wartime strategy. The technology available in WWII made significant collateral damage inevitable, but with certain obvious exceptions ("terror bombing," etc), I don't think I've heard anyone say that strategic bombing is any more immoral than shooting enemy soldiers. And by "anyone" I mean anyone who doesn't find all aspects of war immoral. Is that who you're referring to when you say "most modern liberals?"

I'm sure you can find people who morally object to both of these things, but "most modern liberals" consider them "among the most immoral aspects of US society?" That seems to be quite a stretch.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] montanaisaleg.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] montanaisaleg.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 20:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] montanaisaleg.livejournal.com - Date: 10/2/11 22:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 22:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dukexmachismo.livejournal.com
You've really got it in for the dead guys lately, don't you?

(no subject)

Date: 12/2/11 04:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debergerac.livejournal.com
what would history be without dead guys?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dukexmachismo.livejournal.com - Date: 12/2/11 14:08 (UTC) - Expand

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
262728293031