![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
What are the odds that this gets a LOT worse by the traditional spring time offensive season when a young general's fancy turns to invasion?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
Brief timeline:
North Korea is accused of torpedoing a South Korean warship.
South Korea fires at North Korean fishing boats crossing the maritime border North Korea refuses to recognize.
North Korea is revealed to have highly modern facilities for nuclear material enrichment.
Not to mention, North Korea is facing the challenge of passing along the regime to a third generation of the Kim family.
North Korea is known for rattling its sabre and demanding to have attention paid to it when it is being ignored, but this is looking like a very different than recent years -- South Korea really has to retaliate...and half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul metropolitan area within artillery range of the DMZ.
So a question -- is North Korea suicidal or are they betting that this behavior can get them some more winter grain shipments?
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:18 (UTC)I dunno... I don't know that the world or Koreans would be better served with the two countries reuniting. It would be East and West Germany x 100 with regard to how difficult that would be. My guess is that you'll see less and less drive to reunite in SK as the older generation dies off and living people don't remember a united Korea.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:25 (UTC)China does not place automated gun towers on its borders, either.
The US is far from a saint but in the last 40 years it has grown very squeamish about civilian casualties on either side and clearly does not have the stomach to actively commit genocide even on a small scale any longer.
But if the comparison is China, the US has still killed more civilians (in war).
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 07:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:06 (UTC)Is Barak Obama a legally chosen President?
Did he perform all of pre-elections obeys?
Is it true that the most (who voted for Obama) of the America people want to collapse their country? I think not. So why you have elected a man who's running to collapse? Is there any guarantee that the next elections will drive the American nation away from collapse?
BTW, DPRK (according to Wikipedia) also have had an elections in 1998, 2005 and 2008
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 08:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:06 (UTC)Where are these citizens of Rome?
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:10 (UTC)Ever heard of brainwashing? And/or fear of political persecution?
I think you have. Given your apparent origin.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:14 (UTC)I'm learning to handle it inside this community as well.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:16 (UTC)Are you contending that the last presidential elections were, by chance, rigged, therefore illegitimate? That's some pretty huge conspiracy we're talking here. Got some evidence? We're about facts here, right?
Obeys? Didn't get that part too well. I assume you meant promises. Well, that's a problem. Does any politician ever fulfill 100% of their promises? What do they do promises for, during elections?
Returning to Kim - he says he'll bring prosperity to his people. Has he done it? And if not, who would hold him accountable for failing on his promises, and more importantly, how? Is that possible at all, since he holds all power tools in his country?
Is there ever a guarantee for what would or would not happen in the future? Who can guarantee the future?
And let me guess. 100% of everybody voted for dear Kim. Right? Everybody just adores him so much they're afraid to even question him why they're so poor and starving. Love is crazy, isn't it?
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 09:54 (UTC)2. Thanks for corrections, I've meant promises of course. Adolf Hitler, for example, did. Kim fulfiled his promises. People of NK live much better than 10 years ago (AFAIK). Sure, it's looks like latest Soviet Union on photos, but that's just the question of time.
3. God can :) Just follow his regulations, and everything will be Ok (with the highest possible degree of probability).
4. Have no information on that point to be honest. But it looks like yes. I don't see the problem here. This is not the selection between two or more candidates. It's mostly the procedure of people acceptance of the previously chosen leader.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 10:05 (UTC)Thanks for your thoughts!
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 11:07 (UTC)DPRK is a subject of global politics, ROK is just an object of it.
(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 11:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/11/10 11:33 (UTC)There's some inconsistency here. First you say they live better than they used to (for which by the way you haven't provided any citation/evidence, as have you neither for any of your other claims) - and then you say it's a question of time (which implies it still hasn't happened but is bound to happen sometime in the future). Notice the discrepancy?
Which god exactly? There's no god in Juche ideology, you talked about the Koreans not wanting anyone to impose their foreign beliefs and systems on Koreans, didn't you?
It would only be fair if people were offered several alternatives to choose from. They weren't.