(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 11:07 (UTC)
Put any country leader (Barak Obama for example) in place of Kim Jong Il -- and this sentence will still be true. The only difference is in scale. USA says "give me more resources -- oil, cheap workers, minerals etc), and have a lot of nuclear weapons already. Nothing changes in general. This is a major rule of the politics (AFAIR). You're strong -- and you rule. You're weak -- and you're ruled. DPRK is strong, while ROK is weak.
DPRK is a subject of global politics, ROK is just an object of it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30