[identity profile] thies.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Using the constitution as toilet paper - again. The Obama administration authorized the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki who holds US citizenship. There is some nefarious precedent being created by allowing the President to order the killing of American citizens, regardless of their alleged crimes, without granting them their 5th Amendment rights. Bush with his renditions, and the implications of the Patriot Act was bad enough, but ordering a US citizen to be assassinated as Obama now did takes it to a whole new level. I bet Stalin would be proud of Barry Soetoro. Anyone want to wager which other parts of the constitution will be considered void by Obama until he gets kicked out of the white house?

(source)

(no subject)

Date: 8/4/10 04:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
I know, I suppose there can be a military justification for most anything during a "real war". My point was any war, even an undeclared war, (which this isn't really) one does what is necessary to win. Probably the better example would have been the dropping of the atomic bombs. The problem with that is too many people 60 years after the fact feel that was unnecessary, and was in fact terrorism. You see my point isn't to fault them for the way they are waging their war, my point is, is that they are enemy combatants, even if they happen to have US citizenship.
I'm not even arguing you (and *new_machine*) don't have good points. I just think you are wrong. (note: before VN got mentioned my main comment was more for clarification.....I pretty much planned on staying out of it ;) )

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031