[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
The World Bank’s action plan responding to an internal review on the bank’s resettlement practices does not address the serious failings the review found, 85 non-governmental organizations and independent experts from 37 countries said today in a letter to the World Bank president, Jim Yong Kim. (source)

World Bank breaks its own rules as millions lose land and livelihoods : Review of World Bank documents reveals electricity, water and transport projects contravened safeguards designed to protect rights of indigenous people. (source)

Dams, power stations and other projects designed to help the developing countries - all of that, financed by the World Bank... and it has all taken away the livelihood and homes of 3.4 million people around the world, a recent journalistic investigation shows. The report warns that the very existence of those people is under threat.

Some examples )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
Yesterday was the World Water Day, an occasion that is meant to raise awareness about the water issues of the world. And it's not like there aren't any. Water consumption has never been as high as it is today, and it is only bound to be increasing more, because of population growth, population mobility, social change and particularly the expansion of the middle class in the emerging economies, water use for producing biofuels, and of course, climate change.

The access to basic water-related services (fresh drinking water, sewerage, and food production) continues to be insufficient in large parts of the developing world. The scenario of doing business-as-usual means approximately 5 billion people (that is 67% of the world's population) are likely going to remain depraved of adequate sewerage, 780 million lacking access to clean water - and that problem is not changing any time soon. Although the current tendencies point to 90% of the global population having some access to fresh water sources, in the meantime progress in the development of sewerage systems remains inadequate for the time being. And that is directly related to mass epidemics.


Read more... )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
"Buy land, they're not making it anymore", Mark Twain famously urged his audience. These words have been the motto of the markets for agricultural land for a long time, and they describe the mindset of the active land buyers across the developing world.

During the last decade, agricultural land (mostly across Africa and South-East Asia) roughly equivalent to the territory of Germany (33 million hectares, according to the most conservative estimates) has been purchased by foreign governments and companies. They develop enormous estates for food-growing and biofuel processing, the bulk of that production either returning directly to the original market or being exported on the international markets.


The rush for the fields of gold )
[identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
Last February, NPR's Planet Money examined a unique strategy by Ecuador's government to preserve its Yasuni National Park, an isolated and wild place reached best by hours in a canoe. This is one of those places with amazing biodiversity, with more tree species in a hectare than most more northern countries have within their borders.

The problem threatening the Yasuni? It has oil, and President Correa, seeing the destruction other Latin American countries have suffered for oil exploration/extraction, wanted to avoid a similar fate for his most wild of national places. His solution: ask for money to preserve the park as is.

Seriously. Planet Money interviews those seeking to preserve the park by asking for money:

As payment for preserving the wilderness and preventing an estimated 410 million metric tons of fossil fuel-generated carbon emissions from entering the atmosphere, Correa has asked the world to ante up in the fight against global warming. He is seeking $3.6 billion in compensation, roughly half of what Ecuador would have realized in revenues from exploiting the resource at 2007 prices. The money would be used, he says, to finance alternative energy and community development projects.


So, how'd that all work out? )
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
http://www.mfablog.org/2012/08/scientists-water-shortage-could-lead-to-worldwide-vegetarianism-by-2050.html

A stern warning indeed. The water shortages in various regions of the world are getting more severe with every next year. And the result would inevitably be a drastic change in the eating habits of the ever increasing human population, which is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050.

The water resource is not limitless, especially fresh water. There are already serious problems in vast parts of the world, in food production, food prices, etc. Some have already caused social and political unrest like the Arab Spring (the food prices being among the main factors that triggered the revolutions in the Middle East).

There is a prediction sneaking in that this would cause entire segments of the human population to re-direct to a more vegetarian diet, because growing plants requires relatively less water consumption per calorie, compared to breeding livestock. Currently, people get roughly 20% of their needed proteins from meat products, but the forecasts point to a tendency that this share would be dropping down to 5% by 2050, mostly due to the rampant droughts and the subsequent water and food shortages.

Read more... )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
The shadow economy, or the black market as some call it, could provide a viable option for poor people to make ends meet and save many lives, and not only that. It could stimulate a stagnating economy in times of strife. Such heretic ideas were expressed by one Robert Neuwirth in his book Stealth of Nations, where he urges the reader to look a very neglected truth about global economic life straight in the face.

He claims that the shadow economy should have been looked at as a form of "big business" a long time ago because it already has the revenue and scope of real big business. In principle, the black market mostly includes the illegal street trade and services with fake and contraband goods. It does not contribute to the public budget because it does not pay taxes (or pays very little), and in that it could be viewed as a detriment to the economy. But on the other hand it is often the only means of livelihood for millions of people, and their only chance to have access to these goods and services, and access to jobs which would have been impossible in the regular cycle of entrepreneurship and employment - for various reasons.

This of course is a very bold statement. Moreover, Neuwirth is putting in the category of "shadow economy" a myriad of activities involving over 1.8 billion people around the world, mostly in jobs that are one or another form of fully illegal economic life, with no proper oversight and therefore hiding many risks for the consumers. Sometimes we are merely talking of some industrious vendors who are trading small quantities of stuff like electric gadgets or fashion items, clothes and cosmetics outside the officially established channels and outlets of the big trade chains. Very often this is the only way for a broader array of consumers to access these goods and services in markets that are otherwise widely neglected, bypassed and forgotten by the big firms and trade chains.

Read more... )
[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com
Last night , I was shocked. Utterly amazed, even.

I found myself mentioning the Nestle Boycott to someone and they said "yeah , I know about the Nestle Boycott"
But someone else said
Companies can and should be able to provide this option without being accused of just being money-grubbing.
So, lets look at what Nestle is actually doing in poor, developing countries. Ok, corporations should be able to offer goods and services - I agree. But, is Nestle offering an ethical service, or are they indeed 'money grubbing'?

For the record, I am not anti capitalism per se, but when a company like Nestle goes into the developing world, the poorer nations, or whatever we used to call the Third World this week and agressively promotes their product to women who don' really need and really can't afford their products - I call this corporate vandalism, if not manslaughter.

Seriously, my wife and I won't have a product made by Nestle or any of its subsidiaries in the house or the shopping basket until they quit the aggressive and high pressurised marketing of their products in the poorer nations.

I mean like ~everyone~ who cares about what happens to women, or their children in poorer nations ought to be on the Nestle boycott, and ought to be writing to the company and saying why they are on it.

You might well tell me that "You have been doing this for decades, and the problem is still here". Ok, but it is the principle. Economic boycotts worked against Iceland, and will work against Nestle if enough people know and get on board and tell the company why they did it.

So, have a link. Yes, I am using Wiki.
Any challenges against Wiki will be met with the sources they cite against this company.
Lets have it out. if anyone thinks that Nestle is being badly treated by Wiki or anyone else, step up please, and make your case.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

I also looked for tags on Nestle, Boycott and stuff like that. We don't do them it seems. Scandalous!
[identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/haiti/article/920149

It's now been just over a year since Haiti was hit with a devistating earthquake. And yet, while the rubble has been cleared thousands still live in tents and crime and violence are still rampent.

The world seems to have forgotten Haiti quickly. Sad, yes, but not a surprise. These are tough times and even people in the first world are having a hard time making ends meet. People the world over are normally pretty generous towards these situations. But that didn't happen this time. When you're worried about next month's rent some poor SOB in the Caribbean isn't worth much more to you than a somewhat cold reminder that things could always be worse.

But running with this a bit relief to Japan is still on people's radar. Granted, that's a much more recent nightmare. Still, let's not kid ourselves. Japan has money and a lot of it. They've got tech, skilled workers and a hell of a lot of people you can sell stuff to even in hard times. While Haiti isn't financially or politically important to much of anyone. Except maybe the Dominican Republic and they're got their own problems to worry about.

It seems that the developed world looks out for it's own while the third world is forgotten unless they have oil. Not a surprise to any of us, I'm sure. But at times like this I think a reminder is order. For the cold comfort if nothing else.

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031