tcpip: (Warpath)
[personal profile] tcpip
Tony Benn blackboardMany people dislike involvement in politics because what they witness is the shameless acquisition of power, of nepotism and corruption, and partisanship. For far too many, this results in a great number of truly talented people stepping away from engagement in public life. Not only does our society miss out by having the involvement of such great minds, but also we collectively run the risk of being ruled by those who are pathological and narcissistic, who actually enjoy the aforementioned negative characteristics. Unfortunately, many well-meaning political activists take an erroneous attitude to this situation, ending up in two groups going in very different directions. Both those engaged and disengaged from the practical affairs of political life remark, "that's just how politics is", with the engaged group gritting their teeth and carrying on and becoming increasingly part of the system's approach, and the disengaged either forming anemic, if well-meaning, social networks or slipping into the selfish lifestyle of "individual anarchism".

These responses are not helpful. The existence of politics is inevitable because it determines our rights, freedoms, and obligations and the just distribution of shared and produced resources. There is no escaping from it. Every square centimetre of soil, air, and water on this planet is subject to some politics, even bizarre edge-cases considered (e.g., Bir Tawil) on earth or beyond it (the Outer Space Treaty of 1967). Simply put. wherever there are two people or more there will be politics, as they must have a means of governing their polis. But whilst politics is inescapable, the means of governance can be altered. Just as interpersonal relationships can be arranged differently to be more or less inclusive and equitable, so too the political system is not something set in stone and can be changed to reduce the influence of the worst, of the most pathological. The following are a few suggestions that can be applied for making society less of a kakistocracy, the rule of the worst, least qualified, and most unscrupulous citizens.

Read more... )

These actions are the appropriate way to engage in the political community. One will note that there was nothing about the competitive and partisan attempts to gain office and maintain power. This is about changing the system, not becoming part of it. Despite all this, and on a personal note, always look after yourself and seek balance. Whilst this article has illustrated the importance of being involved in politics, it is not all of life. One does still need to have the means for a livelihood, but once an abundance of necessities, a few utilitarian comforts, and fewer still precious momentos are acquired, of what gain is more? Do find the time to enjoy and immerse in natural beauty or the arts whilst it is available. Do find the time to engage in learning science and technology. Do find the time to be reflective of the past, prepare for your future, and live in the present. But also, engage in the polis and make the world a better place.
dancesofthelight: A fractal curling and uncurling in a loop (Otherwordly things)
[personal profile] dancesofthelight
One of the more amusing aspects of the craze built around that HBO adaptation of the A Song of Ice and Fire series is the view that Daenerys Targaryen, the heir of the family that conquered a continent with trained Kaiju that are essentially l living, breathing nuclear weapons ala Godzilla and Rodan having an ugly redheaded lovechild left to a Catholic priest, was ever heroic.

https://truthout.org/articles/daenerys-targaryen-was-never-a-liberator/

cut for length and number of links )

If the real life dead massacred by living and dead empires are not worthy of true concern, or even the hollow gesture of an official apology, why should fictional dead be any different? Why the feigned shock that a tyrant who conquers areas and leaves them worse after the fact does not change her stripes in a new territory that is still more crucial to empire dreams? Real empires have done this worldwide, their victims sufficient to raise blood to drown the oceans. And it is no different to make heroes of Leopold III, Hernan Cortez, or Paul Bremer than it is to do so for a fictional dynasty of imperialists. As in fiction, so in reality. What people make of stories is the mirror of truth and seldom in a way intended or desire, perhaps, in either case.
tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
Following from a previous sketch on the ideal size of government [1] the following is an attempt to describe some formative directions towards an ideal determination of government. This exploration is, in part, directly influenced by the previous essay, but also by debates over confederate, federal, and unity forms of governance and the notion of representation, influences from various voting systems, especially proportional representation in election and governance, social choice theory and Arrow's Impossibility Theorem, plus previous reviews of deliberative democracy [2]. Of course, engaging in the questions of what is the ideal determination of government is worth starting from the other direction and specifying what determines the worst government type, a kakistocracy [3], rule by the less competent and less scrupulous. Note that this is not describing the actions, but the process that has led to such a government.

Read more... )
tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
What is the optimal size of government? This is an issue which has interested political scientists, economists, psychologists, anthropologists and more for many years. For some anarchists the ideal size of government is zero; in contrast, the totalitarian perspective argues for a society where the State controls all [1]. It is argued that anarchists sometimes err in a conflation between government and the state [2]. A contemporary quirk is that most contemporary "anarcho-socialist" perspectives argue for the abolition of the state yet for democratic governance of social property, in contrast to the "anarcho-capitalist" perspective, which argues for the abolition of democratic governance of social property in favour of numerous private states.

Starting from an examination of the need for governments of different scope, the following looks at some of the major theories concerning the optimal size of different types of governance, heavily informed from public economic theory. In doing so, it is hoped to overcome some of the shortcomings of theories of this sort, but also to provide some steps towards resolving what are often well-meaning, but extremely flawed, perspectives in political theory and voluntary association.

Read more... )

Cross-posted at the usual suspects.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 272829 3031