[identity profile] raichu100.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Looking at the entries for the past couple of days (I have been away from LJ for a little while), I didn't see any posts with this video, and only one post about the bill.

I'm inclined to think this is a bad idea. How will attacking Google and YouTube solve the (dubious) problem of internet pirating? I don't think it's worth the potential negative consequences.

Thoughts on the video or the issue as a whole?

Edit: welp, the imbed failed spectacularly. Here's a link to the video on americancensorship.org (scroll about 2/3 of the way down), and here's a link to the YouTube version.

(no subject)

Date: 18/11/11 01:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
I'm not seeing a video here... has the censorship brigade already begun its nefarious work?

Video

Date: 18/11/11 02:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com


You have to click "Use old embed code" in youtube for the embed to work with livejournal.

(no subject)

Date: 18/11/11 05:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
It's basically an attack on the internet.

(no subject)

Date: 18/11/11 07:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Emulating China & North Korea's approach to the internet is a very bad idea.

(no subject)

Date: 18/11/11 09:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
[message deleted because user has been imprisoned]

(no subject)

Date: 18/11/11 21:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
It's an attack on pirating, it just has some unfortunate (or fortunate, depending on your perspective) side effects.

(no subject)

Date: 19/11/11 05:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Are you just being contrarian for the sake of it here?

(no subject)

Date: 19/11/11 10:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
Rhetorical question is rhetorical. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 19/11/11 21:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
I want people to be accurate. It makes it easier to solve problems if you accurately describe the problem.

(no subject)

Date: 19/11/11 23:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Yeah, because these are unintended consequences instead of intended consequences, right?

(no subject)

Date: 20/11/11 11:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Yes, because they're attacking piracy, not the Internet. They're just damaging the Internet in the process. It's the same reason why it's not useful to label every act of prejudice as racism when they aren't.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031