http://raichu100.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] raichu100.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-11-17 08:57 am

PIPA video

Looking at the entries for the past couple of days (I have been away from LJ for a little while), I didn't see any posts with this video, and only one post about the bill.

I'm inclined to think this is a bad idea. How will attacking Google and YouTube solve the (dubious) problem of internet pirating? I don't think it's worth the potential negative consequences.

Thoughts on the video or the issue as a whole?

Edit: welp, the imbed failed spectacularly. Here's a link to the video on americancensorship.org (scroll about 2/3 of the way down), and here's a link to the YouTube version.

[identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not seeing a video here... has the censorship brigade already begun its nefarious work?

Video

[identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 02:46 am (UTC)(link)


You have to click "Use old embed code" in youtube for the embed to work with livejournal.

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
It's basically an attack on the internet.

[identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
Emulating China & North Korea's approach to the internet is a very bad idea.

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 09:36 am (UTC)(link)
[message deleted because user has been imprisoned]

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-11-18 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It's an attack on pirating, it just has some unfortunate (or fortunate, depending on your perspective) side effects.

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-11-19 05:49 am (UTC)(link)
Are you just being contrarian for the sake of it here?

[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com 2011-11-19 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
Rhetorical question is rhetorical. ;)

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-11-19 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I want people to be accurate. It makes it easier to solve problems if you accurately describe the problem.

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-11-19 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, because these are unintended consequences instead of intended consequences, right?

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-11-20 11:52 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, because they're attacking piracy, not the Internet. They're just damaging the Internet in the process. It's the same reason why it's not useful to label every act of prejudice as racism when they aren't.