[identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics


To me the choice is simple, we can prop up a cabal of brutal dictatorships that kill homosexuals, keep women as second class citizens, and don't care if they destroy the environment.

Or we can by our oil from Canada.

To be explicit, if you object to harvesting the Alberta oil sands you are an objectively misogynist, gay bashing, Gaia raping hypocrite.

;P

(no subject)

Date: 4/11/11 21:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
Even with a signifigant (100%) increase in efficiency the relative enrgy density of wind and solar power means that you'd have to pave most of the US with collectors in order to meet current energy demmands.

So you use wind and solar to add to the aggregate energy output.

(no subject)

Date: 4/11/11 22:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
People have no clue how energy density plays such a large part in all of this.

Hydrocarbons are popular because they have such a large energy density. If you had a battery that could go ounce for ounce with them you'd have a ready replacement for vehicle's hydrocarbon fuel.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30