![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

To me the choice is simple, we can prop up a cabal of brutal dictatorships that kill homosexuals, keep women as second class citizens, and don't care if they destroy the environment.
Or we can by our oil from Canada.
To be explicit, if you object to harvesting the Alberta oil sands you are an objectively misogynist, gay bashing, Gaia raping hypocrite.
;P
(no subject)
Date: 4/11/11 21:04 (UTC)So you use wind and solar to add to the aggregate energy output.
(no subject)
Date: 4/11/11 21:58 (UTC)It just annoys me when people push "alternative energy" as if it represents some all encompassing solution while also ignoring the practical engineering issues like storage, distribtion, and relative density of said energy sources.
(no subject)
Date: 4/11/11 22:17 (UTC)Hydrocarbons are popular because they have such a large energy density. If you had a battery that could go ounce for ounce with them you'd have a ready replacement for vehicle's hydrocarbon fuel.