Recall Elections
10/8/11 07:57![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The Republicans retained the State Senate in Wisconsin yesterday:
Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.
What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?
There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.
Democrats won two state Senate seats in Tuesday's historic recall elections, but failed to capture a third seat that would have given them control of the chamber.
By keeping a majority in the Senate, Republicans retained their monopoly on state government because they also hold the Assembly and governor's office. Tuesday's elections narrowed their majority - at least for now - from 19-14 to a razor-thin 17-16.
Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.
What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?
There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 12:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:39 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 16:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:44 (UTC)By 62-32 they support eliminating subsidies to oil and gas companies.
By 84-14 they oppose cuts in Medicare or Social Security.
By 50-46, they support cutting defense spending.
By 73-23 they oppose cutting Medicaid and entitlements.
By 65-27 percent, they think the debt deal treated the elderly unfairly.
By 63-29, they think it treated the poor unfairly.
By 61-30, they think it treated the middle class unfairly.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/08/08/119959/poll-americans-see-debt-deal-as.html
As long as Americans are willing to bend to their corporate masters instead of making their voices heard, we're going to continue along the same path of supply-side destruction. Progressive thought is actually shared by the majority, but our politicians only listen to the corporate entities that funded them, not their constituents.
The fact that people continue supporting these despots means there's deception and a misinformation campaign on a grand scale in this country.
Peace.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:55 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:(no subject)
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:Re: DQ!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:Re: Voting against my own interest
From:(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 21:35 (UTC)Party Affiliation
Media Endorsements
Advertising!
Single Issue Voting
etc
I think it's obvious that the people in TP (and other political comms) tend to be the outliers, we actively research political issues rather than regurgitate sound bites.
The reason that voting changes in scope each year (in general) is not that people are less ignorant, but that the people voting are coming out in larger numbers for (XYZ) candidate. The silent masses can often disagree with the vote results, but couldn't be bothered to show up at the polls.
(The aforementioned was directed at ALL parties, not simply one or the other. IMO the reason that 2008 was such a slaughterhouse for example wasn't that the tide of American opinion had necessarily changed drastically - the 2010 elections proved that - but that the Republican base was so beaten down that they stayed home.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 18:09 (UTC)That more than 60% of the people surveyed have absolutely no fucking clue what was actually in the debt limit agreement since it did not contain any actual cuts directly it could not in and of itself have been fair or unfair to anyone.
Further it shows that more than 80% of the people are absolutely clueless about the numbers driving the national debt because cuts to Medicare and Social Security are unavoidable. It might somehow be magically possible to cut them in terms of cost without cutting benefit levels, most likely by restricting eligibility through means testing or some similar mechanism but cuts to those programs from a spending perspective are unavoidable and the sooner we actually make those cuts the less drastic they would be.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 21:38 (UTC)If only. Someone who is making over 100k a year has absolutely no need to be collecting a $600/mo check from the government. Although I know that the cut-off level would represent a fairly small number (maybe 10-20% of the general population) but the savings could be a fairly significant number en masse.
(no subject)
Date: 11/8/11 00:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:05 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Depends on who you ask
From:Re: Depends on who you ask
From:(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 14:54 (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky11UJb9AY
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:31 (UTC)"What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin?"
Without knowing anything about Wisconsin politics, I'd say there was a bit of buyers remorse since the incumbents lost 33% of their vote.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 16:43 (UTC)You mean 33% of the 6 incumbents the Democrats chose/were able to target, though. And at least one of them lost arguably on issues unrelated to the Walker plans.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 15:39 (UTC)This guy is much angrier than I am but he's absolutely right.
(no subject)
Date: 10/8/11 16:29 (UTC)The Wisconsin populace is smarter than the talking heads, some of whom had no affliation with unions or teachers, up at the capitol square. We are at risk for losing good businesses not only to overseas competition, but also to domestic havens for business culture. Case in point, why should Kohls stay in Menomonee Falls, WI when they can relocated to Little Rock, get a free building and considerably lower taxes.
I'd say the voters read between the rhetoric and kudos to them. I'm glad that Alberta Darling, for example, did not lose her job. Power to the people!
(no subject)
Date: 11/8/11 00:49 (UTC);)
There, feel better?