[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=228736&R=R1

I was wondering if this was going to happen. There is a small fringe group of ultra-Orthodox Israeli Jews that want to revive that esteemed Jewish cultural tradition of polygamy. That used to be pretty regular where Sephardi culture is concerned. And as expected the Ashkenazim like that tradition no more now than ever. They still think of it as a perversion of Judaism (I'm sure Abraham, Israel, David, and Solomon would be interested to know that it was in fact such a perversion). I think this if anything confirms that Christianity is not the only religion to produce cuckoolander reactionaries. Usually, though, these types *are* Christians.

SO what do you in the community think? Is this really no true Scotsmen-not Jewish? Or are these people the Israeli version of FLDS in the USA? I personally see them as Israel's FLDS and expect this to happen in Israel when Shabbatanism is confirmed as the official sect of Judaism there.

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/11 21:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com
The world would obviously be a better place without Jews, Christians or Muslims.
Edited Date: 17/7/11 21:30 (UTC)

It already happened.

Date: 17/7/11 22:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Buddhism is where monotheism started. It is the parent religion to the other three which are adaptations of old polytheisms to the One True Buddha.

Re: It already happened.

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 19/7/11 08:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: It already happened.

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 00:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: It already happened.

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: It already happened.

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/11 23:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com
Or without any people whatsoever. Imagine the idyllic, Eden like innocence of a world without humans. Of course, some animal would go an spoil it all by evolving, and then the whole bloody mess would start over.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 00:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com
Spoken like a true harry beast!

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 00:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Somehow I don't see nature as ever being idyllic nor eden like. Nature is a war zone, always.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 04:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com
Being eaten alive is not idyllic.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 01:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com
I like the way you equivocate between the idea that a particular set of beliefs are false and people would be better off not believing them, and suggesting we have a new holocaust so we can slaughter the people who hold those ideas.

Not sure if it's intentional or not, but kudos either way!

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 01:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com
Where have I suggested slaughtering abybody?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 01:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com - Date: 18/7/11 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/11 22:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
It's a dumb reason to be pro-polygamy, but I wouldn't oppose it there anymore than I would here, provided there's no coercion or the like involved.

I wonder if...

Date: 17/7/11 22:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
In ancient China the rich guys were allowed to marry one woman for the purpose of having a boy to inherit all the property and the responsibilities that go along with it. A fat cat could have as many concubines as he wished to make babies of an inferior status.

I think it is interesting that one of the motives for this is very similar to the National Socialist policy of promoting more babies of the "right" genetic material for fear of being swamped by the population of the "wrong" type.

Re: I wonder if...

Date: 18/7/11 15:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Those Christian Zionists are so quaint. We need to keep them around as long as possible so that we have something to laugh at.

(no subject)

Date: 17/7/11 22:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com
I don't understand why wanting to practice polygamy automatically makes someone a "cuckoolander reactionaries."
From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com
How awful! We need to make sure no such people exist in our ideal religionless future.

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 02:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 3fgburner.livejournal.com
They're putting sugar in their porridge.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 05:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
laws regarding marriage

why not permit bigamy or polyamory?

(no subject)

Date: 18/7/11 10:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stewstewstewdio.livejournal.com
The article states: "It is being promoted as the Jewish solution for the abundance of single women, the Arab demographic threat and the male predicament of seeking extramarital relations." in the opening lines.

Does this mean men hate being Jews?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."

July 2025

M T W T F S S
  123 456
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031