Are ACORN and Planned Parent hood using the same staffing agency?

[verytwistedmind.livejournal.com]

My questions are:

 1)      Why does this keep happening?

a.       Consider that in 2008 Planned Parenthood had a similar mistake happen.

b.      How many times does it need to happen to be no longer a ‘mistake’ and we question their

2)      I believe that liberalism/progressivism/Democrats are inherently good and caring people. Is it that natural inclination to be caring that is somehow warpped their decision making ability when confronted with this sort of Evil? Are they being dupped into thinking they are ‘helping’ these children/young teenage girls by allowing some man to abuse them?

3)      Can we have this dialog without it going to the abortion issue? I’d like the discussion to be about LiveAction/Planned Parenthood/ACORN and the acceptance of underage sex workers.

A Planned Parenthood manager in New Jersey coaches a man and a woman posing as sex traffickers how to secure secret abortions, STD testing, and contraception for their female underage sex slaves, and make their whole operation “look as legit as possible” in an undercover video released this morning.

Clinic manager Amy Woodruff, LPN, of Planned Parenthood Central New Jersey’s Perth Amboy center, warns the pimp and his prostitute to have their trafficked underage girls lie about their age to avoid mandatory reporting laws, promising, “even if they lie, just say, ‘Oh he's the same age as me, 15,’…it's just that mainly 14 and under we have to, doesn't matter if their partner's the same age, younger, whatever, 14 and under we have to report.” She says, “For the most part, we want as little information as possible.”

 “If they're minors, put down that they're students. Yeah, just kind of play along that they’re students--we want to make it look as legit as possible.”

“This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Planned Parenthood intentionally breaks state and federal laws and covers up the abuse of the young girls it claims to serve,” said Lila Rose, President of Live Action
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/vid-shows-planned-parenthood-advising-pretend-pimp-about-underage-sex-slaves/ 

Planned Parenthood fired Amy Woodruff the manager. Is that enough? Shouldn't strong policies be put in place so this doesn't happen again?

This isn't Planned Parenthoods first time offense against children

The Mona Lisa Project videos document Planned Parenthood's willingness to repeatedly violate mandatory reporting laws for statutory rape that protect children.
http://liveaction.org/monalisa <-- 2008


http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2009/09/14/acorn-sex-scandal-now-a-triology-okeefe-exposes-again-in-new-york-city-video/  <-ACORN sex scadal.

 The similarity of these scandals bothers me a lot. Where are these liberal groups failing to train their employees/managers!? What policies and procedures are missing that would allow the ACORN manager or the Planned Parenthood manager to think that  discussing child prostitution rings with a man would ever be okay?  I've been in middle management for a long time now and after a few years you just become indoctrinated into the Corporate policy. I find myself towing the line all the time. Why aren't these managers doing the same? I know in my heart of hears that ACORN and Planned Parenthood don’t officially condone this sort of EVIL. Why is Live Action repeatedly able to find those individuals who are in charge (that’s important. They are the leaders not just some flunkies) who’d help out such a sick bastard.

 ACORN’s focus was housing and not nearly as well funded as Planned Parenthood ($374.7 million 2008). They have the revenue to train better. They should not be making this sort of grievous and awful mistake. Especially after 2008. Fool me once shame on you...fool me twice...loss of funding?

Comments

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

I notice you don't have much to say about this (http://community.livejournal.com/talk_politics/883777.html?thread=66908481#t66908481). It's pretty simple. Either O'Keefe & Company are shining ethical journalists, crusading for truth, or they're skeevy liars. I'm obviously of the "skeevy liar" persuasion. You obviously prefer to believe they are truthful.

[mrbogey.livejournal.com]

Is your assertion that it's okay to lie about unethical people?

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

And what is it I have lied about, pray tell? I'm not the one white-knighting O'Keefe & Company as shining valorous champions of the truth.

[mrbogey.livejournal.com]

You said they admitted to a felony. They clearly and absolutely did not.

I get ticked when people are slandered. All you have to do is stop slandering people with provable lies. Till then you're in the same class of liars as birthers and truthers.

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

All you have to do is stop slandering people with provable lies.

Oh, OK, fine. He didn't admit to it publicly; we just all know it was in his plans. Or if you prefer, we suspect it of Mr Wanna-Be Date Raper.

[mrbogey.livejournal.com]

Well, I know for a fact that you're a rapist based upon how you clearly are one. And since I don't have to prove my assertion of your guilt I think we can leave it at that.

C'mon, do I have to keep committing vagrant fallacies against you for you to realize what a fallacy is?

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

Please. You're telling me you're unaware of his plan to drunk up a CNN correspondent and then get his hot lovin' while she's all unconscious as a 'liberal sting'? Oh sure, he said "I never would have gone through with it.", but when you have the plans in B&W in loving detail with the boat already tricked out and ready? Really? I'm expected to believe that?

Let me ask this: Why are you so willing to take the word of some dudebro fratguy who thinks he's all Watergate material? You believe he's innocent of everything that's ever been said about him.

[mrbogey.livejournal.com]

I'm glad you changed the subject to another incident altogether.

'You believe he's innocent of everything that's ever been said about him.'

Seeing as how in the case of the Landrieu incident you've done nothing at all in any way to prove he's guilty of anything criminal outside of what he's plead guilty to, I don't see how I can believe he's not innocent unless you present evidence.

Everything else is another issue but you lied about his confession. And here we are.