(no subject)
1/2/11 21:39![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
It's Not the Job Market
The three real reasons why Americans are more anxious than ever before.
When a team of UCLA researchers released its latest annual report on the mindset of America's university students last week, one finding screamed out for red-alert media attention: Our college kids are more stressed out and anxious than ever before. In the researchers' surveys of more than 200,000 incoming freshmen, students reported all-time lows in overall mental health and emotional stability, and this news sent the media on a high-strung spree of its own. ABC World News ran footage of harried-looking teenagers rushing around campus, Time wondered "Why Are College Students Reporting Record High Levels of Stress?," and the New York Times story on the report vaulted to the top of the paper's most-e-mailed list.
The culprit for this soaring stress, the stories unanimously declared, is the horrendous job market—a thoroughly lame explanation. I don't know about your college experience, but when I got to school a dozen years ago, my classmates spent about as much time pondering the future "job market" as they spent leafing through calculus textbooks for fun. These news stories have missed the truth because they've overlooked one crucial fact: Students are becoming more anxious because, for many years now, we've all been growing more anxious. This isn't just a campus issue. It's an American issue.
Over the last several decades, both through good economic times and bad, the United States has transformed into the planet's undisputed worry champion. Around the turn of the millennium, anxiety flew past depression as the most prominent mental health issue in America, and it's never looked back: With more than 18 percent of adults suffering from an anxiety disorder in any given year, the United States is now the most anxious nation in the world, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. Stress-related ailments cost the nation $300 billion every year in medical bills and lost productivity, while our usage of sedative drugs keeps skyrocketing; just between 1997 and 2004, Americans more than doubled their spending on anti-anxiety medications like Xanax and Valium, from $900 million to $2.1 billion. And this anxious strain hits us well before we reach college. As psychologist Robert Leahy points out: "The average high school kid today has the same level of anxiety as the average psychiatric patient in the early 1950s."
This national surge in nerves is somewhat baffling because we're actually safer from true danger than we've ever been. A century ago, psychologist William James wrote that modernity had insulated us so well from grave threats like grizzly bear attacks that "in civilized life … it has at last become possible for large numbers of people to pass from the cradle to the grave without ever having had a pang of genuine fear." Yet James might have been surprised to learn that even as our streets become safer, our cars more crash-proof, and our food and drugs better regulated, we still keep finding ways to become more tense. And don't assume that this is a problem that affects all nations equally: According to the 2002 World Mental Health Survey, people in developing-world countries such as Nigeria are up to five times less likely to show clinically significant anxiety levels than Americans, despite having more basic life-necessities to worry about. What's more, when these less-anxious developing-world citizens emigrate to the United States, they tend to get just as anxious as Americans. Something about our particular way of life, then, is making us less calm and composed.
So what's behind our ballooning issues with anxiety and stress? This is a thorny question, obviously, and one that can't be solved with any single answer. We could blame our cutthroat work environment, for example, yet work stress alone can't explain our fretfulness, since anxiety hits housewives and the idle rich just as hard. We might point the finger at the sputtering economy, but we kept growing more anxious even in boom times. When I was researching my new book on how people deal best with fear, stress, and pressure, however, I spoke with scores of psychologists and neuroscientists about this question, and I picked up three main themes in their replies. Together, this trio of answers offers a solid start toward explaining the rise in our national nervousness.
For the experts, one particularly egregious offender is America's increasing loss of community, what we might call the "Bowling Alone" effect. Human contact and kinship help alleviate anxiety (our evolutionary ancestors, of course, were always safer in numbers), yet as we leave family behind to migrate all over the country, often settling in insular suburbs where our closest pal is our plasma-screen TV, we miss out on this all-important element of in-person connection. As fear researcher Michael Davis of Emory University told me: "If you've lost the extended family and lost the sense of community, you're going to have fewer people you can depend on, and therefore you'll be more anxious. Other cultures have much more social support and are better off psychologically because of it." Another factor that adds to this problem—especially among young people—is our growing reliance on texting and social media for community, which many psychologists say is no substitute for real human interaction. When you're feeling most dreadful, you don't run to your Facebook profile for consolation; you run to a flesh-and-blood friend.
Continuing with this tech theme, the next culprit the experts mentioned was the torrent of (often nerve-racking) information we now consume. For one thing, the amount of data we take in each day has jumped dramatically—the average Sunday newspaper contains more raw information than people in earlier eras would absorb over the course of a few years—and some neuroscientists believe that our brains simply weren't designed to handle this kind of volume. But even worse, this avalanche of data is increasingly of the alarmist, fear-igniting variety. If a TV newscast isn't covering a grisly double homicide, the anchor is teasing a story about the hidden threat in your own home. "The media does this to us," explained Evelyn Behar, a worry expert who teaches at the University of Illinois-Chicago. "It's always reporting that this thing causes cancer or that thing can kill you. We live in a culture where fear is used to motivate us."
And finally, we're especially vulnerable to this kind of manipulation because of the third factor: our intolerant attitude toward negative feelings. Put simply, Americans have developed habits for dealing with anxiety and stress that actually make them far worse. We vilify our aversive emotions and fight them, rather than letting them run their own course. We avoid situations that make us nervous. We try to bury uncomfortable feelings like anxiety and stress with alcohol or entertainment or shopping sprees. Psychologist Steven Hayes, creator of a highly effective anxiety treatment formula called acceptance and commitment therapy, told me that we've fallen victim to "feel-goodism," the false idea that "bad" feelings ought to be annihilated, controlled, or erased by a pill. This intolerance toward emotional pain puts us at loggerheads with a basic truth about being human: Sometimes we just feel bad, and there's nothing wrong with that—which is why struggling too hard to control our anxiety and stress only makes things more difficult.
Of course, loss of community, information overload, and a crummy attitude toward uncomfortable emotions aren't the final, all-encompassing answers for America's widespread case of nerves. They're simply a starting point for a more productive discussion. The good news here is that we have the tools to halt this trend, because in recent years psychologists and neuroscientists have given us a far better idea of how to deal well with anxiety and stress than ever before. So despite all of our worry and strain, America, fear not: With a bit of intelligently applied effort, any one of us can bring our anxieties back into a healthier balance. And maybe, just maybe, our college kids will one day be able to return to the state of appallingly irresponsible, beer-soaked carelessness that is their birthright.
www.slate.com/id/2283221
I think articles like this are especially interesting. Fear is a huge motivating factor for people, probably the biggest one there is.
I definitely agree with this article's premise that people often try to bury their anxiety or stress in booze/drugs/tv. As someone who has, unfortunately, had to deal with a random bought of anxiety attacks this past summer, I feel that merely trying to suppress these emotions is a disaster and a half. I feel like most people these days like a quick fix to something and don't want to actually work through their own emotions. They'd rather take a pill and be happy.
And that people too often believe emotions to be a state of reality as opposed to something temporary. I feel this causes a lot of our problems in intercommunication today, especially in politics. I also feel that the media is only interested in tapping into people's emotions at this point, especially fear and anxiety.
Do you think that most Americans are too needlessly anxious? Or do you think they have reason to be anxious? Should we let our emotions be so influential on our lives? How do you think people being guided by their emotions effects politics or communication in politics?
What about the idea of "feel goodism"? Do you think it's important to feel and acknowledge even negative emotions? Do you think it's wrong to try and ignore negative emotions in order to feel better? Or is it only natural to want to always feel good? Does it make us spoiled and naive as a people to want to always feel good? Or does it not matter?
Do you think that we have, as Americans, lost our sense of community?
edited to add tags.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 04:04 (UTC)I do like that is it very demotivational though.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 04:22 (UTC)Sort of -- but at least back in the day when you were in a covered wagon train going across the prairies and you caught dysentery and died, you had family members to bury you. Now people slowly die in nursing homes, being cared for by strangers. I think that difference matters.
But I don't think it's an American problem.
It would be interesting to compare the US to other developed countries. The article only mentions developing ones.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 06:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 07:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 09:18 (UTC)If you think about it, our nation was almost kind of founded on a vaguely anti-community sentiment, given that, even though much of our government is based on majority-rule, we also had provisions in place from our founding forward to check the power of the majority (such as the Senate ensuring that states with lower populations don't get steamrolled by the will of the larger-population states). Which makes sense, because if you mythologize the origins of your country as "a rag-tag band of scrappy individuals fighting off an entire empire," as America has done, then you're always going to be looking over your shoulder in fear of a new empire emerging, even if it's in your own backyard, and a broad-based sense of "community" is often seen as a pretext to that (if Obama's critics had simply wanted to dismiss his qualifications, there were much more effective ways for them to do it than constantly repeating the unwieldy phrase "community organizer," which makes me suspect that it was in fact the idea of someone organizing a community that struck fear into a lot of people's hearts, for precisely the reasons I've outlined).
I know my specific examples are framing this in left-versus-right terms, but both the left and the right in America tend to reframe the majority as automatically equating to "tyranny" whenever they themselves happen to be out of power, which once again plays into how Americans have mythologized themselves as the "underdogs" ever since our nation's founding, to the point that even those who hold the same opinions as the rest of the majority often try to reframe themselves as "rebels" or "oppressed" for doing so (contrast this with the culture of the Japanese, which is unashamedly intolerant of individuality to the point that one of their sayings is, "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down").
TL;DR: There's a natural limit to how much you can really be a fan of the concept of "community" if you harbor a two-centuries-plus suspicious resentment of any sort of majority.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 21:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 03:52 (UTC)However, as someone with an anxiety disorder (PTSD) I can also say that for some, even having a static base community from which we come doesn't mean we actually connect. (Developing PTSD and "becoming a different person" post-trauma meant a lot of previous relationships were wrenched away. Moving hundreds of miles away to a place where people aren't asking me to be who I was before means I am, slowly, building interpersonal relationships where I can rely on people and interact.)
Also, sometimes emotions are reality. Or, looking at it from a PTSD point of view, my emotions *can* change how I experience my reality. And while that might be more obviously true for me (trigger me and I might get a full on hallucinatory flashback where I am experiencing actually threats to my person and react accordingly), I do think it's true for others as well.
My godfather's absolute fear of gays/other liberal sodomites (his words, not mine) colors and changes how he experiences reality. It's not necessarily rooted in reality, but, the truth is, a lot of people *will* turn against him after hearing him rail about "those hell damned French sodomites" (Enlightenment philosophers, in case you were wondering) and that, in turn, does effect reality. There is a true cause and effect with emotions-truth-reality that's not as simple or clear cut as "this is reality and that is emotion."
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 04:03 (UTC)I agree and disagree with you here. Last summer I suddenly, out of basically no where, started getting very bad anxiety attacks. I would suddenly become unable to breathe, unable to move, and unable to contemplate any action without assuming the worst would come from it. It was terrible.
I constantly tried to fight it and become my normal, cheery self yet it didn't work. I eventually learned to deal with it and even basically fix it, but that's another story.
But I can understand how certain strong chemical reactions can absolutely color your reality. Being in the middle of an anxiety attack can make your reality a very bad place.
However, I also feel that we have more control over our emotions, or at least how we react to them, than most people admit.
Emotions are something you can look at and say, "I will indulge in that emotion or I won't." There is nothing that absolutely forces you to act on an emotion in any situation. That's why there can be such division among people because of the topic of emotions. If someone reacts to a situation with calm, where most people would be very angry or upset, that person is considered odd. Or if someone is happy when they should be sad.
I am in an open relationship and people constantly consider me odd or in denial because of my lack of jealousy. They assume because they would feel jealous, that that is how anyone and everyone should feel in that situation. I feel like this sort of assumption is at the root of a lot of misunderstanding between people, both in politics and in life in general.
Most people I know didn't even consider simply choosing to not react a certain way. Not that it's easy all the time, but it is possible.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 06:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 05:39 (UTC)Dear College Freshmen,
Hello. The world doesn't owe you shit. You all have to grow up and become adults, just like every other generation has had to grow up and become adults. Stop you mewling and be happy this isn't 1861, 1914, 1929 or 1941.
Sincerely yours,
The Universe.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 06:12 (UTC)And maybe it would be better for them if this were 1861, 1914, 1929 or 1941--it might give them a bit of perspective, which I think is the biggest problem here. We're so damned "safe" we have no idea what real danger is, so anything that doesn't fit our idea-of-the-moment of comfort falls into "danger".
Of course, some ppl's lives, even in America, are truly horrific. There's also a serious problem of dissonance, where one's experience of reality is not what media-or-whatever is telling you it either is or should be. I think that causes a lot of anxiety, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 06:28 (UTC)I feel like most people also dislike not being happy. There isn't really any idea of being in neutral or just coasting through life in American society. Society constantly tells us that we need to be happy all the time. If people aren't happy then they become unhappy and try to distract themselves with things like booze/drugs/tv. I don't think this applies only to college students, but more to the country as a whole.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 13:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 16:58 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 06:25 (UTC)And there was comfort in simple explanations, even when not true. But most of us are not as ignorant as we used to be. We know stuff that makes us question more. As a result, our education made us know less. I mean be less sure about stuff.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 07:27 (UTC)While it is true that we are presently struggling as societies with an apparent epidemic of anxiety and similar emotional problems, the truth is, people have always had such issues and in such volumes.
What's different now is that because we have made significant inroads in understanding and teaching the kind of emotional self-control that in the past was the reserve of a highly specialised social clique, those who were very old and mature, and a few others who happened to naturally encounter the haphazard co-incidences of pressures that teach such control, psychologists and society at large has acquired a new faith in the malleability of the personality for the better and the potential for everyone (or nearly everyone) to can acquire these wonderful emotional skills quickly.
Therefore anyone who doesn't have such emotional skills, college students included, can now be classed as abnormal and requiring treatment, whereas 60 years ago that was just the natural maturity level of their character for that age.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 16:56 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 13:47 (UTC)Yes, they are 'interesting'. I've seen similar ones over the last half century. And fear either motivates one to crawl in a hole and whine... or get up, get moving, and overcome the fear.
"Do you think that we have, as Americans, lost our sense of community?"
We used to develop that sense through involvement in Boy Scouts, Kiwanis Club, church membership, sports clubs, etc. Those things still exist for active people; we've just added the internet to expand social networking. Individually, we still engage each other - but one can only handle so many relationships.
"As psychologist Robert Leahy points out: 'The average high school kid today has the same level of anxiety as the average psychiatric patient in the early 1950s.'"
I don't think Mr. Leahy was a psychiatric patient in the early 50s, and he certainly isn't a high school student today, so I call that statement hyperbole.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 15:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 14:24 (UTC)Anxiety can be kind of a vicious cycle though, because it can make it difficult to connect with people and form new communities. I've got anxiety from being disconnected, now I've got to get a handle on my anxiety before I can start connecting with people again.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 16:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 16:55 (UTC)I'm sure it has something to do with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 17:08 (UTC)The biggest culprit however I think is the media and the culture of fear it spreads because that in and of itself feeds into the other two. After all if everyone out there is a secret pedophile terrorist identity thief it makes it that much harder to trust and make friends with anyone in your new town.
One area they missed as a source of anxiety however is the impact of an over regulated state on our lives. Go sit down with 10 parents and have a frank conversation with them over their biggest fears and at least 6 of them will tell you someone calling Child Protective services on them. Not because they think they are abusing or neglecting their children but because of the unprecedented levels of power that Child Protective services has. That is just one area but there are thousands of others as well and it is not all government either. Even overly strict Home Owners Association rules put extra stress on the residents of the community
(no subject)
Date: 2/2/11 17:21 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Follow the money
Date: 2/2/11 22:42 (UTC)This is largely due to the "big pharma" companies lobbying the government to lower the standard for what may be diagnosed as clinical depression, anxiety, etc. - AND to encourage the prescription of medications for said conditions. They did this to sell happy pills and it worked wonderfully. They have never been more profitable.
and it's never looked back: With more than 18 percent of adults suffering from an anxiety disorder in any given year, the United States is now the most anxious nation in the world, according to the National Institute of Mental Health.
Not surprising since the standards for what is considered a mental health issue were lowered in response to industry lobbying. Consider (): Its difficult to do "the right thing" when doing "the wrong thing" is profitable....
Consider (http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/1/gary_greenberg_manufacturing_depression_the_secret): Buy or Die!
Stress-related ailments cost the nation $300 billion every year in medical bills and lost productivity, while our usage of sedative drugs keeps skyrocketing; just between 1997 and 2004, Americans more than doubled their spending on anti-anxiety medications like Xanax and Valium, from $900 million to $2.1 billion
"Cost the nation in medical bills" means money into big Pharma's pockets.
Leave ya with this: Big Bucks, Big Pharma: Marketing Disease & Pushing Drugs (http://www.democracynow.org/2007/1/19/big_bucks_big_pharma_marketing_disease)
(no subject)
Date: 3/2/11 02:47 (UTC)facebook.
(no subject)
Date: 3/2/11 03:20 (UTC)I'm very stressed.
It has nothing to do with loss of community, or the torrent of information I consume, or an intolerant attutude toward negative feelings.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the job market.