TSA

24/11/10 09:03
[identity profile] wbm.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Hey there. This is a comics opinion of my own creation.

tsa,strip search,airport,priest,catholic,molestation

I've never flown. With what's happening in airports these days, I never will. Among my personal issues is a near-total mistrust of authority, & that's under normal circumstances. This developing TSA sitch isn't normal, but what if it becomes the accepted standard?

As many before me have, I try to ascertain where religious practices originate. One tradition's no pork/shellfish makes sense in a pre-refrigeration culture. With another tradition's three rinses of water over the body on the right & 3 on the left, it, too, makes sense when one realizes that a single rinse barely washes anything away; as a one-time floor cleaner, the first layer of water is applied to dissolve/absorb dirt & other substances; subsequent water applications then wash away the dirt-laden water.

So, with these new rules, where will our up-&-coming TSA agents come from? The standards set for the applications process for police, clergy, seniors care & daycare are acceptable if one assumes everyone is & remains reasonable & well-adjusted. And yet this is the tragic, human flaw that abusers find their way through in order to make contact with unassuming new victims.

Unless something changes, & quickly, this is going to become a worst-case scenario without ever seeing another bomb.

We are terrorizing ourselves with penetrating eyes & groping hand condoms.

(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 17:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijopo.livejournal.com
Right, that's why I phrased it as a question, just to make sure. but I thought it was a reasonable interpretation of this "So, with these new rules, where will our up-&-coming TSA agents come from? The standards set for the applications process for police, clergy, seniors care & daycare are acceptable if one assumes everyone is & remains reasonable & well-adjusted. And yet this is the tragic, human flaw that abusers find their way through in order to make contact with unassuming new victims."

If you don't agree, please tell me why you think that interpretation isn't correct.

Remember we had a conversation about putting additional meaning to people's words and I promised to point you at those occasions when you're at the brink of doing that?

whatever. don't feel obligated to uphold a promise to do pointless and paternalistic things. I'm sure those with whom I'm conversing are entirely capable of telling me where or how I've misinterpreted what I've said. Or perhaps you'd like to make yet another addendum to Rule 8 or whatever the fuck.

(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 17:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijopo.livejournal.com
s/what I've said/what they've said/

(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 17:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
I see where you're going with that. No, you have a point. On second reading, I may've sounded paternalistic, so please accept my apologies.

"Or perhaps you'd like to make yet another addendum to Rule 8 or whatever the fuck."

LOL. The master of snark :-)))

Image

(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 18:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijopo.livejournal.com
ah, how can I be mad at you when you're so gracious. Can I make a snark rewind?

(no subject)

Date: 24/11/10 18:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Come on I like snark.

(But hush! Don't tell them!)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary