![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

This is a video clip from "Climate Denial Crock of the Week" puts to rest one of the canards by global warming deniers: that in the 1970s, scientists predicted a global ice age, and the idea of human based climate change due to increased levels of CO2, well that was a relatively recent idea hawked by Al Gore. As you will see, all of this is utter hogwash. Considering that key committees in the House of Representatives will likely be chaired by AGW denialists, the stakes in the misinformation game by the Right couldn't be higher. I think this is a critical step by scientists, and long overdue!

Popular Mechanics - 1953 / Dr. Gilbert Plass of John Hopkins University: article on CO2 causing global temperature increases.

Bell Telephone Science documentary (directed by Frank Capra) showing ramifications of global warming due to human caused CO2 increases.

President Johnson's scientific advisory report warned of significant temperature increases by the year 2000 due to CO2.
Today in an unprecedented move the American Geophysical Union, the country's largest association of climate scientists, "plans to announce that 700 climate scientists have agreed to speak out as experts on questions about global warming and the role of man-made air pollution. The still-evolving efforts reveal a shift among climate scientists, many of whom have traditionally stayed out of politics and avoided the news media. Many now say they are willing to go toe-to-toe with their critics, some of whom gained new power after the Republicans won control of the House in Tuesday's election."

Lord Christopher Monckton of Great Britain, global warming denialist extraordinaire.
John Abraham of St. Thomas University in Minnesota, will be assembling what's called a "fast response" team to rebut denialists. In May of this year, Abraham posted an extensive rebuttal to Lord Monckton's anti-global warming lectures, given around the world (an anti-version of Al Gore, so to speak). Lord Monckton has appeared on Fox News and Glenn Beck's evening show.
Abraham's rebuttal is lucid and compelling and shows in many instances Lord Monckton is outright misrepresenting information on many topics that are favorites to global denialists, including shrinking glacial ice sheets, rising water levels, are polar bear populations decreasing, the Medieval Warming period, Co2 levels, is Solar variance to blame for recent warming etc.
(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 21:56 (UTC)mainstreamrenown science outlets. ;-)(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 22:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 22:35 (UTC)That's nice, dear.
(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 22:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 22:40 (UTC)earsstarving.(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 22:49 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:piece by piece.
From:(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 23:02 (UTC)Or is that also a case of "It's only a bad thing when you guys do it?".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 8/11/10 23:35 (UTC)Right?
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 04:57 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 00:31 (UTC)Been here
Date: 9/11/10 02:42 (UTC)http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/global%20cooling.htm
http://www.john-daly.com/schneidr.htm
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/cooling1.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttLBqB0qDko (warning: autoplay)
http://www.masterresource.org/2009/09/the-global-cooling-scare-revisited/ (which also references the flip-flop from the 1950s)
http://www.stopglobalcoolingnow.com/?p=499 (references the 1970s ice age scare)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html
etc.
Less than a second on Google.
Now that the Republicans are back in charge of the House we can stop the lies and move toward real science.
Re: Been here
Date: 9/11/10 04:42 (UTC)Yes, like Intelligent Design!
Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
Date: 9/11/10 04:47 (UTC)Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
Date: 9/11/10 05:16 (UTC)http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It's kinda nifty, it addresses every denier myth and destroys them with facts.
Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Denial ain't just a river.
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
Date: 9/11/10 15:57 (UTC)Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Re: Been here
From:Facts? You don't need facts, you have hyperbole!
From:Oh well
Date: 9/11/10 05:07 (UTC)Re: Oh well
Date: 9/11/10 05:44 (UTC)Re: Oh well
From:(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 11:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 12:21 (UTC)Selective omission, cherry-picking facts, and blatant lying, exist, it appears, more on the denialist side of the debate, but even given that, Monckton's example does appear to be more than ordinarily egregious.
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 13:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 16:08 (UTC)This is correct
" very bad things are already happening as a result of this effect and they are getting worse"
If they are really saying this then they are very poor scientists as "Bad" and "Worse" are entirely subjective
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 15:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 17:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 16:37 (UTC)