Gay as a pejorative
1/11/10 12:16![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
“Ladies and Gentlemen, electric cars are gay,” Vaughn’s character Ronnie Valentine says. “I mean, not ‘homosexual’ gay, but ‘my parents are chaperoning the dance gay.”
- The Dilemma
This preview has been getting a lot of negative press because of the use of the word ‘gay’ as a pejorative.
This is a pet peeve of mine among young people. I’ve noticed that 10-19 year olds seem to default to ‘gay’ way too much. So for me, it’s not a question of sensitivity to treatment of homosexuals as it is to the lame minds of our youth.
Ron Howard has said he will not remove this comment from the movie. I kind of think it fits the sort of comment and back peddle you typically hear from a Vince Vaughn character.
So my questions:
1) What do you do when you hear someone say “that’s gay” as a pejorative?
a. What is a more apropos term/slang? I don’t want ‘lame’ coming back because of my time spent in the 80s…. I feel ‘lame’ is the gateway word to ‘gnarly’. Gnarly makes me want to gag myself with a spoon…like totally.
2) Are you planning on seeing this movie? Does the ‘gay’ comment affect your decision?
3) Is it okay to call Sponge Bob and Flapjack gay okay? I mean…come on they are gay..right?
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 17:42 (UTC)a). What's wrong with "lame?" I think it would occasionally be appropriate to let someone know that they're handicapped in a way that's not literal, and to let them know they need to catch up.
2). I don't think I'll see this movie anyway.
3). I'm going to invoke a link that may be cliched but still apt:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HaveAGayOldTime
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 18:09 (UTC)On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Re: On the word lame:
From:Responding to you and not the long thread afterwards...
From:Re: Responding to you and not the long thread afterwards...
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 17:46 (UTC)I don't pay money for Vince Vaughn movies. I don't even watch them when they come on nonpay cable TV. I find the man crashingly unfunny, much as I find Will Ferrell unfunny.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 18:23 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:words matter.
Date: 1/11/10 17:50 (UTC)1a) Your example is flawed in much the same way. It wasn't until I got to college around hard of hearing folks & other physically or otherwise challenged people that I learned that my use of the word "lame" was ableist. Even today, I find that word lingering in my vocabulary & I take pains to confront my own use so that I re-sensitize myself.
2) I hadn't heard of the movie (I'm woefully out of the loop), but controversies like this make it less likely that I will view it.
3) No. "Gay" should not be used as a descriptor, except in its (now obsolete) usage meaning "joyous, buoyant".
Re: words matter.
Date: 1/11/10 18:02 (UTC)Re: lame
Date: 1/11/10 18:49 (UTC)Very rarely does 'that's gay' have anything to do with sex when it's used.
Lame however can mean "weak; inadequate; unsatisfactory; clumsy:".
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lame
Disabled people are rarely called lame. They are more often referred to as handicapped or special needs. In fact I have never heard anyone use the word lame to describe a person with a disability. Maybe the exception would be in a book but nothing modern.
Also, the word 'lame' should not be removed from our negative lexicon because it has intergraded uses such as lame-duck
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+lame+duck&aq=0&aqi=l1g2&aql=&oq=lame+duck+de&gs_rfai=
Taking ubrage with the use of lame is a bit hyper sensitive. I'd compare it to getting butt-hurt over niggardly.
Re: lame
From:Re: words matter.
Date: 2/11/10 08:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 18:07 (UTC)Honestly, I would have seen this movie and rolled my eyes at the word when it was used, but wouldn't have personally protested the movie over it. Now that it's been made into such a big deal though and they refused to back down from it, it just makes them look like insensitive assholes. Coming up with another word that isn't hurtful and marginalizing to people really isn't that difficult and people who insist on doing so despite being talked to about it really shows they just lack basic compassion and don't deserve my money.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 18:11 (UTC)a. Almost universally, when 'gay' is used in this way, there's something more specifically crappy about it which would be mentioned instead. This depends on context but I don't think there's a good one-size-fits-all substitute.
2) No, and no. The quoted dialogue is a joke about the practice of using gay as a pejorative, and I don't think it's all that hard to distinguish between one layer of meta and two. I still probably won't see the movie.
3) Flapjack is bi.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 18:51 (UTC)a) I'll have to think about this more.
2) EXCELLENT POINT! Never looked at it this way.
3) Bi implies sex with women. I disagree Flapjack is as gay as an all man orgy is babyoil.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 21:01 (UTC)Are you planning to watch the movie?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Irony
Date: 1/11/10 19:07 (UTC)Us: Gay = homosexual
Our kids: Gay = lame
Complaining about it is...gay.
Re: Irony
Date: 1/11/10 20:05 (UTC)Except most homosexuals themselves refer to themselves as gay, and most of society refers to homosexuals as gay, including "our kids". Ergo, your comparison is invalid.
Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:Re: Irony
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:08 (UTC)And honestly the more gays complain about it the more it will be used, because I think our society is becoming increasingly trollish. Making something forbidden is the fastest way to make something appealing to teenagers and grown-ups with a teenage mentality.
The way I see it there are three ways gays can handle this. They can fight it and try to use PC pressure to make it unacceptable, but IMO that'll just drive the use of the phrase underground. They can ignore it, or they can go with the flow and use it that way themselves and eventually come up with some other slang for homosexual that doesn't have a negative connotation.
The third option isn't that far-fetched, I can think of at least two friends of mine that are gay and use the term in a derogatory fashion.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:15 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:14 (UTC)I think South Park made a pretty good point of it regarding the usage of the word "fag" to describe a jerk.
Also worth pointing out: language tends to evolve towards the shortest words possible for the sake of convenience. While I rather enjoy "nincompoop", it really takes a toll in terms of syllables. "Idiot" or "dickhead" are much shorter and easier.
I don't particularly like it, but it's the way slang evolves and occasionally becomes commonly accepted. If I'm going to avoid using "gay" in this new context I'll do it because I wish to respect any homosexual company I may find myself with, not because the spokesperson of some organization needs a reason for his/her salary.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 21:01 (UTC)I think we need to take back 'fagot' as a pejorative, it's such a nice choppy word.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:29 (UTC)Now on to the questions...
1) I don't think anything of it, they obviously do not mean it to be offensive to homosexuals in general, the meaning of the word is simply evolving.
2)Um, it stars Vince Vaughn. In my book that puts it barely a half step above a Paulie Shore movie. The man is not funny, interesting, or talented. I can't imagine any way short of someone paying me or a hot girl promising me sex that I could be persuaded to watch another movie of his**.
3) Yeah they definitely are gay in all 3 meanings of the word.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 20:05 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:54 (UTC)I also think that its offensiveness is entirely beside the point in terms of whether or not it should be in a movie if that movie is a work of art (as opposed to, say, an instructional video)/creative expression of the author.
(It's also worth noting that 'lame' as pejorative is to some disabled people what 'gay' as pejorative is to some gay people.)
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 19:58 (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-otAJrtY-w
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 20:22 (UTC)That people do not understand why calling something "gay" when they mean it is "stupid" or something bad betrays how utterly self-absorbed, conceited and lacking in basic logic skills the majority of our culture is.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 20:58 (UTC)I don't understand why people have an issue understanding this. If a group uses a label to describe themselves, other people co-opting that term to mean something negative is obviously a b.s. thing to do
I certainly hope that my post didn't come off as not understanding that it was a bullshit to use 'gay' as a pejorative. Did it?
"gay" when they mean it is "stupid" or something bad betrays how utterly self-absorbed, conceited and lacking in basic logic skills the majority of our culture is.
I don't see how it's self-absorbed or conceited it is logic-missing though and does show a disconnect between thought and words.
Now as a gay man did you find the pre-view offensive? Are you not going to see the movie because of it?
Did you feel forced to go see that gay cowboy movie (OMG I Forgot the name...I've been calling it bareback mountian for so long...lol) or were you actually interested in it? Western romance just isn't my thing plus when I found out there was no actual penetration scene....
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 21:11 (UTC)2) I don't know if I'll see it or not, but it doesn't affect my decision. I doubt that his character is intended to be a paragon of virtue, he's portraying a flawed and ignorant human being like the rest of us. It fits in to his ignorant character well.
3) Who is Flapjack? I looked up pictures of him and he has wonderweiss teeth, and that's scary.
(no subject)
Date: 1/11/10 22:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/11/10 03:02 (UTC)Depends on the time/place/people
I've tried, believe me. But then sometimes there's my gay (well, technically bi-sexual, but currently long-term dating a dude, so to most, he's de-facto gay) and he uses gay in the same way the movie did
2) Not planning on it. Prolly will when it's on Netflix insta-watch (my guess, 10-14 months) or HBO (8 months?)
3) It's okay to call homosexuals gay. Cause they are.
I don't watch spong bob, I dunno if he's homosexual or not.
It's okay to call Barney Frank gay. But it's used to degrade far too often. And it's de-facto inferior to things that aren't gay--or so the language seems to imply.
Laws against pot aren't gay.
They are awful, terrible, stupid laws. But not gay.
Gay isn't awful, terrible and stupid.
Neither are electric cars.
(no subject)
Date: 2/11/10 08:20 (UTC)We've come up with a suitable alternative in one of my classes, now things are so "twilight".
(no subject)
Date: 2/11/10 13:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/11/10 01:41 (UTC)http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2010/10/the_gay_dilemma.html
http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2010/10/for_those_who_were_offended.html
The comments are well worth reading also, somehow.