A brief continuation?
22/5/10 15:41![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Censorship, continued:
What kind of response do you think South Park would have had, if instead of showing Buddha doing cocaine, it showed Mohammed [w/ or w/o a censor bar{and ignore censoring by the network}] doing cocaine?
Why do you think that?
What kind of response do you think South Park would have had, if instead of showing Buddha doing cocaine, it showed Mohammed [w/ or w/o a censor bar{and ignore censoring by the network}] doing cocaine?
Why do you think that?
Re: "delusional"
Date: 23/5/10 01:19 (UTC)http://community.livejournal.com/talk_politics/540552.html?thread=38965128#t38965128
I thought it was a very complete response. Your response to it was like watching someone play that game when they hit gophers with a rubber hammer- just a bunch of disconnected defensive statements. And then it just ebbs back in to both of you shouting and picking each others nits.
(Is malasadas a "he"?)
Re: "delusional"
Date: 23/5/10 03:22 (UTC)You responded with derision to a post I made at 5:38PM EST and gave as an example a post he made at 7:58PM EST. I don't have the ability to time travel. That is not part of the suite of tools that come along with being white.
I responded at 8:11PM EST to his serious post and at 8:14PM EST you posted chastising my role in this argument. Did you even read my rebuttal within that extremely short time frame? Unlikely. Especially since you didn't reply to it and instead replied to an earlier post.
You're just not being intellectually honest here.
You're checking my timestamps now?
Date: 23/5/10 04:17 (UTC)You know maybe I can time travel.
Wow.
Re: You're checking my timestamps now?
Date: 23/5/10 04:46 (UTC)The timestamps are right there on the posts. I also get email replies. How I laid out the sequence of events is accurate.