Huntington's Clash of Civilizations deals with an aspect of the global scene that one of our students likened to an algae raft. Imagine a lake completely covered with algae. Minor differences in the genetic composition of algae leads to a competition between the distinct varieties. A zone of conflict appears where each variety attacks the other with hostile toxins.
The planet is like the lake in the sense that it is covered with power cults of minor differences. The God of Redneckistan differs slightly from the Allah of Wahhibistan which differs slightly from the Allah of Khomeinistan. All of these material Creator gods differ slightly from that of Mosistan and that of Maoistan. Each of these power cults secrete toxins in a struggle to dominate the globe.
What Huntington failed to consider is not the conflict, but the name "civilization." Stone Age power structures do not a civilization make. The problem is a lack of civility and civilization.
What do you see as your role in your local power cult? Do you see yourself as its proponent or as an element of resistance?
The planet is like the lake in the sense that it is covered with power cults of minor differences. The God of Redneckistan differs slightly from the Allah of Wahhibistan which differs slightly from the Allah of Khomeinistan. All of these material Creator gods differ slightly from that of Mosistan and that of Maoistan. Each of these power cults secrete toxins in a struggle to dominate the globe.
What Huntington failed to consider is not the conflict, but the name "civilization." Stone Age power structures do not a civilization make. The problem is a lack of civility and civilization.
What do you see as your role in your local power cult? Do you see yourself as its proponent or as an element of resistance?
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:13 (UTC)Power cult is what they call guilds on the European servers, right?
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:15 (UTC)Do you want to end in pain or you'll render unto Caesar just like every single one of the rest of us does?
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:21 (UTC)HA!
Resistance...
Date: 22/4/10 23:29 (UTC)On the other hand, there are ways to resist without bumping up against the Gestapo.
Re: Resistance...
Date: 22/4/10 23:56 (UTC)Re: Resistance...
From:Re: Resistance...
Date: 23/4/10 00:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:16 (UTC)The problem *you* have is associating civilization itself with good. That is emphatically not the case with any of the established civilizations, as opposed to the semi-tribal states that ruled Europe until the 15th Century or so....
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:27 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:If you were correct...
Date: 22/4/10 23:27 (UTC)Re: If you were correct...
Date: 22/4/10 23:29 (UTC)Re: If you were correct...
From:Re: If you were correct...
Date: 22/4/10 23:42 (UTC)With classic barbarism you just get a funny hat, pickled fish and the occasion raid on a monestary.
Re: If you were correct...
From:Re: If you were correct...
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:44 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:And now...
From:I like the prevailing...
From:Re: I like the prevailing...
From:Re: I like the prevailing...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:That sounds like...
Date: 22/4/10 23:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/4/10 00:17 (UTC)Excuse me, I know you're implying that the "other" is the one that does this, but while that is true in spade, your simple definition, as has been pointed out, also includes every other civilisation currently in existence, and certainly applies to your own.
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/4/10 23:49 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/4/10 01:03 (UTC)And I see...
Date: 23/4/10 23:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/4/10 01:04 (UTC)Your view of power cults is too limited, as you're only considering explicitly religious groups, when those aren't actually the ones with the power to secrete toxins.
(no subject)
Date: 23/4/10 11:14 (UTC)'Twas not the royal we.
Date: 23/4/10 23:13 (UTC)As for religious groups, they are the problem children of humanity. There is a reason that the CIA favored Islamist fanatics over more moderate operators. The religious bigots tend to be more into theft, murder, and destruction.