[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Wow. Pope Benedict's personal preacher Raniero Cantalamessa created a firestorm by comparing the scrutiny and pressure the Catholic Church has been experiencing lately in their molestation scandals to the "more shameful aspects of anti-Semitism."

This just further illustrates why the Roman Catholic Church will never take real steps to stop abuse. They aren't concerned with the children that are getting raped, they're only concerned with their own reputation. They see themselves as being wrongfully attacked, and never does it enter their minds that their actions (and lack thereof) contributed to what they are enduring now.

I hope the pressure never lets up but sooner or later the mainstream media will give up on it, only to flare up again down the road after more children have been raped, and the cycle will repeat again.

Pope Benedict, the only way this is going to end is if you take real steps towards stopping abuse. First of all stop protecting priests who molest children and treat it like the horrific sin (and crime) that it is. Throw them out of the Church and/or turn them in to law enforcement.

To help prevent this from happening as much you're going to have to allow priests to marry. Stop making excuses, stop covering up, and make a real effort to end this abuse.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 04:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
Sorry if using the correct words offended you.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
I've noticed that when talking about religions concepts and rituals some people use either really academic ways of describing these things, or very simple childish ways of describing them-- "magic cloud man" or "fairy God in the sky" I think it's supposed to get religious people to see God and the devil in a new light.

But instead, it just makes it seem like you don't think that religious people think about religion very much or question it. Like I've never though-- "how odd it is that the devil is so much like a human" That's not the case for all of us. [livejournal.com profile] a4honor has a point. calling the devil "a anthropomorphic personification of evil" ... I don't know what is the point of doing that?

I guess what drives me nuts is that you seem to be getting some critical details of how Christian concepts work all wrong. And yet you're writing like this is a term paper and you're an expert on religion.

For the record: I'm no expert.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
Well how else do you describe the devil as a concept?

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
Isn't to enough to say "the devil"?

The devil was an angel once but he believed himself to be wiser and smarter than God and for that he was banished from heaven. He still thinks he's smarter than God, and he tempts humankind with the same seductive arguments that got him banished in the first place. He thought it was a great victory when he got Adam and Eve banished from the garden of Eden. But no man, devil or woman can see all of God's plan-- in God's plan the Devil is doing exactly what he must tempting us at every moment-- so that we might find our greater selves and be closer to God, not like children (as Adam and Eve were.) But of our own free will-- But we are human, weak, fragile easily tempted and I suppose the trade-off in all of this is a lot of suffering. Often at our own hands.

The devil is very important in my faith. And to me more than a simple concept.

But that is what I have learned so far in my studies of the devil. Again, I am no expert.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
But I was specifically pointing out that I find the idea of a singular individual being that was somehow...sorry trying to think of another word than personification..the whatever of evil was ridiculous.

I used language how I was taught too. It is like me pointing to a blue object and saying it is a blue object, only to be told off for "talkin fancy like"

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
Why not just say "the devil" ? I don't know, my apologies, if you were not trying to make some kind of point by using an academic description.

I personally don't think it is ridiculous at all.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
That is it. I was trying to make a point. That the idea of evil being represented by a singular humanish figure was silly. Whatever the name we give to that figure, satan, shaitan, the devil, demons whatever. The idea that evil can be represented by some monstrous being is laughable.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 05:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com
That's how you see it. I think about the devil and how he was exiled from heaven and how he became so resentful and I understand my own weakness in those terms. When I resist temptation I think "I won't do the devil's work for him, if he wants all this vodka drank he'll have to come up from hell and drink it himself." I think of how God love even the devil and I amazed by God's compassion and Grace and I hope I could try to be like that if only for a moment or two.

I just don't see why you think it is laughable.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 14:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Ironic you should say that, given the original source material refers to the Devil sometimes appearing as an Angel of Light. Put one way, precious few people are going to be tempted to join spiky evil!Sauron. Quite a bit more would follow Annatar. Satan-as-monster is really adaptation decay.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 14:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
The usual thinking is that the Devil was not alone and that he had a bunch of lesser evil spirits associated with him.

Personally, I prefer the original concept (i.e. Angra Mainyu) as this version of the Devil appears nowhere in the Bible but I'm a cynic about that.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 19:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Except the devil isn't the personification of evil, that's what you're getting wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 3/4/10 14:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
The best way to describe the Devil is to note that the term refers to "Adversary." The usual approach to him in tradition was that he was once the highest and fairest of God's creation, and figured he should be God instead of God. Hence the Devil's actions led to an attempted Coup d'etat but the problem of trying to fight an omnipotent omniscient being is you lose, hard.

The cosmology also makes the entirety of human history a Proxy War between God and the Devil.

(no subject)

Date: 4/4/10 23:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a4honor.livejournal.com
"and each man did what was right in his own eyes" (several biblical passages)
If each man is to take the definition of correct words into his own hands then we will end up in a world quite less enlightened than we have now. The above phrase was used in all cases right before Israel was destroyed or concurred, and on a simply historical note the bible has been proven to be highly accurate.

And i think that you will find it difficult to offend me, I get passionate easily, but its not personal.

(no subject)

Date: 5/4/10 01:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
I am using the proper words for describing what the figure of Satan is in the Christian religion. Sorry if your education didn't cover things like that. But use this as a chance to educate yourself, not try to make fun of others.

(no subject)

Date: 5/4/10 04:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a4honor.livejournal.com
I haven't made fun of you yet, I only do that to people I like. Not that I dislike you either.

Education, does not necessarily beget wisdom. My Education focused on wisdom.

I would rather meet a man with a third grade education, that has the wisdom of years of relationships and watching the world around him than an over educated derelict. Just so I am clear, I don't think your a derelict, misguided but you do show the signs of a person who wants to be responsible. You genuinely care about your beliefs because you perceive danger from the opposing view. God is not dangerous my friend.

And just so we are clear, your breed of sarcasm is making fun:

Sorry if your education didn't cover things like that

That's demeaning.Must mean I am an uneducated hillbilly, I would rather you come out and say "Your are an uneducated hillbilly with no teeth, and you smell funny"

(no subject)

Date: 5/4/10 05:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
Where is the wisdom in trying to make fun of someone for using the correct terminology?

(no subject)

Date: 5/4/10 11:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a4honor.livejournal.com
Ok, well I'm done. Go ahead and keep arguing and ignoring the facts you are presented with. Just remember you can't escape God any more than you can escape yourself.

(no subject)

Date: 5/4/10 11:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com
You haven't presented me with one single fact. You have multiple times tried to threaten me with the wrath of god. And when I point out how I wasn't scared you called me fearful? wtf?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary