[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
It's curious how Meryl Streep's speech (a giant in the profession of acting), which mostly dealt with not-so-overtly political issues, as much as it was calling for empathy and civic vigilance in the upcoming Trump era, was massively denounced (because, you see, an actress has dared to speak of something beyond the latest Gucci outfit, the pearl necklaces of the celebrities, Kim's fake ass, or on some rare occasions, the creative process in cinema in the best case)... And Leo DiCaprio (admittedly an underrated actor, but hardly of Mrs Streep's caliber even in the best case estimations) receives emphatic pats on the back and massive admiration merely for making 40 years of age and having assumed the role of some sort of Al Gore v.2.0? Am I the only one to sense double standard here?

The way I'm reading this, because Leo has a penis this gives him much greater leeway; hell, Robert DeNiro had a boorish statement about Trump, and he wasn't scolded even remotely as harshly as Madonna was. In 2003, Sean Penn gave a rambling speech about the fake WMDs at the Oscars, but again no one decided an actor has no right to use that tribune to flount their political biases. But when an actual actress even hints at a political commentary - Vanessa Redgrave for instance - everyone instantly dogpiles her, hastening to point a finger and put her in her place.

Because, you see, Leo DiCaprio who's been waving his beer belly flanked by an entourage of 18 y.o. wannabe starlets, cannot be declared out-of-touch, but Meryl Streep, Susan Sarandon and Vanessa Redgrave suddenly live in their "Hollywood bubble" and don't know shit about the problems of the regular Joe from Iowa? Please.

On a side note:
2012 Trump: Meryl Streep is one of my favorite actresses!
2017 Trump: Meryl Streep is one of the most overrated actresses!

Sounds just like,
2012 Trump: The Electoral College is a disaster for democracy!
2017 Trump: I won so big OMG LOL!

(frozen) (no subject)

Date: 25/1/17 08:12 (UTC)
garote: (machine)
From: [personal profile] garote
What is this example she is setting? Please enlighten me.

I'm not crafting any strawmen here. It's perfectly acceptable to take a chain of reasoning I disagree with apart, and disagree with the links individually. Do you really think it's worth equivocating "behaving like a a slut" and "being a slut"? Is that the crucial point around which this debate evolves? :P

(frozen) (no subject)

Date: 25/1/17 08:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
What is this example she is setting? Please enlighten me.

Ah. You're playing dumb again. OK.

(frozen) (no subject)

Date: 25/1/17 08:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
You know what, folks?

This conversation is not going anywhere. I've been seeing all sorts of epithets being tossed around with an ever increasing frequency.

I've tried to stay away, hoping you'd settle this in a civil way. Obviously it ain't going to work.

So I'm shutting it down altogether. I'd suggest that everyone involved cools their jets for a while now.

And yes, in case someone hasn't understood what I'm saying, this is a warning.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary