[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Greetings, fellow indifferent cynics hungry news-eaters who, just like me, care about peace and love around the world! Right now, Moldova is at a crossroads that could bring a dramatic turn in its post-Soviet history. The main reason for the chronic political crisis that's been eating up Moldova from the inside for years, is related to a constant threat that has existed ever since the break-up from the Soviet Union: namely, the possibility of a Romanian Anschluss. In other words, Romania has been preparing to swallow up Moldova for quite a while.

The persistent political crisis in Moldova has gradually set up the stage and is constantly increasing the possibility of the execution of an Unionist (i.e. pro-Romanian) coup in Chisinau. The main slogan of Unionism is, "Moldova has failed as a state, therefore it should immediately be unified with Romania", and its advocates have been actively working both among the ruling circles and in the midst of the multi-faceted opposition that's now openly protesting and pushing for snap elections.

The prepared swallowing of Moldova is related to the upcoming 100-year anniversary of the Great 1918 Romanian Union, when in result of the dismantling of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Romanian kingdom added vast territories like Transylvania (then part of Hungary), Bukovina (now part of Ukraine), and Southern Dobrudja (before then, and now, part of Bulgaria).

The calls of the Moldovan Unionists are mostly being inspired from Bucharest, but there've been a number of signs lately that the Unirea 2018 (Union 2018) project has already received the approval of the leading NATO countries. One piece of evidence for that is the claim of the Romanian branch of the Deutsche Welle media that "the majority of members in the Moldovan government have declared that at the highest level of power in Moldova, there is already an understanding of the necessity to meet the conditions that Romania has put for granting Moldova the promised 150 million euro loan. Without these funds, the government would be no longer able to even pay the salaries and pensions of its citizens".

As is already well known, in February 2015 the Romanian parliament created a group called Prietenii Unirii (Friends of the Union), including 40 prominent MPs and senators, its main goal being to prepare and present by the end of 2016 a specific plan for the unification of Moldova and Romania. The recent events in Chisinau stongly suggest that this plan has already been put in motion.


In November 2015, a number of Moldovan media reported that the leader of the then still unofficial Rightist Party, Ana Gutu had urged the Moldovans to sign the Unification Declaration that she had proposed, because "the union of Romania and Moldova is unconditionable". Her hope is that this Declaration could then become law, essentially being a project for a resolution of the Moldovan parliament for the unification of Moldova and Romania into a single state.

In relation to the list of preliminary conditions that Moldova has to meet in order to get the first installment of the promised 150 million euro loan, proposed by Romania, the Moldovan-Romanian oligarch and former prime-minister Ion Sturza jubilantly announced, "The Romanians are coming! For the first time since 1812 Romania as a state will directly take responsibility for the territory between the Prut and Dniester rivers, i.e. Moldova".

Bucharest, quite obviously a staunch US ally, indeed seems more than prepared and willing to "take the responsibility" for the bloodless annexation of Moldova. The current Moldovan PM Pavel Filip (from the Liberal Party) who recently visited the Romanian capital, was assured there that if the protest activities in Chisinau are activated, the Moldovan government could rely on Romania's help, because according to the 2013 Military Cooperation Treaty between the two countries, Romania would be able to send its carabineri units across the border if need be.


This is how the Greater Romania idea looked like back in 1939

In its classical version, the Greater Romania project includes the "unification" of Romania with Moldova, Transnistria (a highly contested area dominated by ethnic Russians, which has enjoyed de facto independence for years), as well as parts of Ukraine (Bukovina and possibly parts of the Odessa region), and even in its greatest extent, the north-eastern corner of Bulgaria (i.e. Southern Dobrudja again). In this sense, it's notable that the deputy chairman of the Liberal Party and current mayor of the capital city Chisinau, Dorin Chirtoaca, has said, "I dream that this damned border finally disappeares, and we become one people and one country again... If we were one country, our fate and our life would be quite different".

Chirtoaca is largely considered a protage and aide to the "evil genius", the grey cardinal of Romanian politics, and Moldova's factual patron, oligarch Vlad Plahotniuc (who, btw, is a long-time business partner of the Chocolate King, current Ukraine president Petro Poroshenko). During a recent visit in Iasi, in the presence of Romanian prime-minister Dacian Ciolos and president Klaus Iohannis, the mayor of Chisinau once more called for the unification of the "two Romanian countries", stating that this was the only option for Moldova to overcome its systematic crisis.

Right now, the majority of the Moldovan parliament is dominated by the Democratic Party, which is completely controlled by Plahotniuc. He expects to be selected president by the parliament (the term of the current head of state Nicolae Timofti expires next month). The Moldovan Unionists have already announced the launching of a specialized TV channel, Unirea TV. The other deputy chairman of the party, Vyacheslav Untile, has said, "I believe our only chance is unification with Romania. And Plahotniuc has already promised that if we pick him up for president, he would manage this unification by 2019".

It's a well-known fact that along with Poland, Romania is considered one of the two foreposts of NATO's influence in Eastern Europe. And the Greater Romania project just so happens to nicely fit into the Polish project called Medzumorie (Inter-sea), which is the creation of an anti-Russian buffer bloc including an arc of countries from the Baltic to the Black Sea to the Adriatic (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia).


The three stages of the creation of the Medzumorie

In other words, the second "great unification" of Romania is potentially a link in the chain of events that makes up the process of the creation of an anti-Eurasianist Baltic/Pontic/Adriatic geopolitical arc, or anti-Russian axis if you like. As the famous Moldovan publicist and chief editor of the local Panorama newspaper, Dmitry Chubashenko says, the plan that Bucharest is having in mind, with the support of its powerful Western patrons, is a "unification" of Moldova and Romania that is essentially an accelerated version of the coveted Euro-Atlantic integration of the latter, because through a simple vote in the Moldovan parliament, and a subsequent simple shifting of the Romanian border a few hundred km to the east, the citizens of Moldova would end up simultaneously NATO and EU citizens just overnight. And then Russia would be having one more problem to deal with, as the geopolitical pressure at its doorstep would increase many times over.

I'm sure you'd agree that the recent NATO decision to place movable military units in those same countries is not helping wind the Doomsday Clock even one bit back, either.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 12:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Oh great. As if all the conflicts it has caused, triggered or inspired are not enough, now the US is stirring up more shit around Europe and Russia's periphery.

(no subject)

Date: 28/2/16 17:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foolsguinea.livejournal.com
I imagine elements of the military brass want something to go wrong. These are guys who go out into amoeba-infested swamps, fighting off swimming pit vipers, and look for alligator to wrestle, and say, "I wish this would suck more."

Or at least that's what they pretend to themselves in their air-conditioned rooms.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 12:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
Is this even realistic? I mean, having romantic dreams about unification with the "brethren" from across the river is one thing... But the economic, social, political and geopolitical cost of the actual process? Can Romania afford it?

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 12:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
OK, but that is from Moldova's perspective. I am asking about Romania's perspective. The Romanians must be pragmatic people - at least much more pragmatic (or less desperate?) than their Moldovan brethren.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 15:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
My first reaction was, "not gonna happen". But then, I really don't know these days. Anything seems possible. Some world players seem hell-bent on repeating past mistakes and doing all sorts of crazy stuff just to stir shit up for their own amusement - or something.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 18:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
It's not realistic, Romania cannot afford it, it would have no practical benefit, Romanian politicians have no interest in it. It might still happen if the external pressures are such that the cost of staying separate is higher than the cost of uniting. Moldova's citizens have de facto Romanian citizenship and can migrate without a problem. From a Romanian point of view, Romanians across the Prut are just as Romanian as those in RO so if Moldova democratically chooses to re-unite, it cannot be prevented.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 12:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
Yeah, and Russia is totally going to shut up and put up with it.

Russia is fucked-up. It'll react in a fucked-up way*. That should've become patently evident by now.


* but maybe that's the idea, after all.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 15:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popvillain.livejournal.com
How long has this been in the pipeline, anyway? B/C if it's retaliation for Ukraine, then... Whoops. OTOH I'd hope that NATO heavyweights know know how to ~strategise~ successfully in ways that elude me.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 15:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
It started as early as the late 80s. Some people in Romania saw an opportunity of snatching Moldova away from the Russian sphere of influence, once the USSR was no more. The concept has gained momentum and taken some shape in the last 5-6 years in Romania, while it's been among some circles in Moldova ever since the 90s. The Moldova card is only being played now because the geopolitical situation allows (or rather, dictates) so.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 21:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popvillain.livejournal.com
Thanks for the context!

The Moldova card is only being played now because the geopolitical situation allows (or rather, dictates) so.

I thought as much. I wonder whether it will bear fruit, though?! Pretty scary.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 15:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
For the record, Romanians prefer to call Moldova "Bassarabia" for historical/sentimental reasons. And because the term includes some areas that are not currently in the Republic of Moldova, and which are apparently included in the pipe dream of the Romanian nationalists.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 18:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
Indeed, it's called Bassarabia although wiki has it as Bessarabia which is a strange name.

Why would it be a "pipe dream" in the case of Bassarabia returning to Romania? When Alsacia re-joined France was it French nationalism? The Sudeten and the Czech nationalists? What about Scotland and Wales, of British nationalists?

Russia has annexed Bassarabia twice and both times it was given to Russia as a gift for being on the right side.

(no subject)

Date: 27/2/16 13:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
There's probably plenty of Bulgarians though to prevent a lack of diversity.

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 15:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamville-bg.livejournal.com
The Romanians are emboldened because of NATO promises for help in this adventurous undertaking. Problem is, like I said recently (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/2070912.html), whichever block we've joined, soon tends to collapse under its own weight. Clearly, NATO and the EU are doomed. Therefore Romania has made the wrong choice. Again. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 18:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
Oh right, like Bulgaria is always making the right choice! It's not Romania's choice anyway, it's Moldova's option.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 19:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamville-bg.livejournal.com
Yeah, and Romania is totally staying out of it, innocently looking from outside what the valiant Moldovans would decide for themselves? Please.

Oh, we've made wrong decisions at every step. And a number of big alliances have come down along with us. ;-)
Edited Date: 26/2/16 19:59 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 25/2/16 18:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
Well, wouldn't you like to see Macedonia unifying with your country? ;-)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Humans are the second-largest killer of humans (after mosquitoes), and we continue to discover new ways to do it."

January 2026

M T W T F S S
    12 34
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031