[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26400035

Fucking brilliant approach, this. First the attempt to play divide and conquer in Ukraine pretty transparently crashed and burned with the retun of Ukraine's Benazir Bhutto to political influence. Then, the Russians decide evidently that they really did move in Russian Army soldiers into the Crimea. Because the proper instinct when a risky gamble fails is to raise the stakes. This is not going to end well by any means. Now I'm wondering how long Lucashenko will have a country to rule as dictator, and what might happen with Round II with Georgia. If Tsar Vladimir I of the House of Putin succeeds in this kind of thing, that will only encourage him to expand his wars of aggression further because Ukraine is rather larger than Georgia, and this would permit Russia to begin aspiring to regain aspects of the old Tsarist boundaries. I sincerely expected Russia would use Central Asia for this kind of thing, not Ukraine.

The EU wouldn't give a damn about invading Muslims in Kazakhstan, but invading an EU state? That's not going to lead Russia to do anything but decide to engage in still-larger wars of aggression in the long term.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/01/world/europe/ukraine-politics/

And one of the chambers of the Russian legislature just approved this request. Hoo, boy.

Shit got real-er:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26403996

The Ukrainian Army is now on full combat alert. The prospect that the centennial year of the First World War will see the first large-scale conventional European war in decades has risen exponentially.

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 01:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Don't draw a line unless you plan to follow it.
Image

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 14:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
^ A million times, this.

Seriously, that anyone can continue to defend this foreign policy...

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 17:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
It's Bush's fault!

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 14:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
You do recall correctly. Actually both sides were pretty divided amongst themselves.

The real point is not to sabre rattle unless you intend to draw it, and don't draw it just to wave around.

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 14:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
Being the president means making such decisions while knowing the other party being willing to skewer you the minute something goes wrong. Obama has sunk US credibility and the world has become a worse place because of it.

(no subject)

Date: 3/3/14 21:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Whatever Obama decides to do on foreign policy, the correct GOP response is to be against it before they're for it.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary