[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26400035

Fucking brilliant approach, this. First the attempt to play divide and conquer in Ukraine pretty transparently crashed and burned with the retun of Ukraine's Benazir Bhutto to political influence. Then, the Russians decide evidently that they really did move in Russian Army soldiers into the Crimea. Because the proper instinct when a risky gamble fails is to raise the stakes. This is not going to end well by any means. Now I'm wondering how long Lucashenko will have a country to rule as dictator, and what might happen with Round II with Georgia. If Tsar Vladimir I of the House of Putin succeeds in this kind of thing, that will only encourage him to expand his wars of aggression further because Ukraine is rather larger than Georgia, and this would permit Russia to begin aspiring to regain aspects of the old Tsarist boundaries. I sincerely expected Russia would use Central Asia for this kind of thing, not Ukraine.

The EU wouldn't give a damn about invading Muslims in Kazakhstan, but invading an EU state? That's not going to lead Russia to do anything but decide to engage in still-larger wars of aggression in the long term.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/01/world/europe/ukraine-politics/

And one of the chambers of the Russian legislature just approved this request. Hoo, boy.

Shit got real-er:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26403996

The Ukrainian Army is now on full combat alert. The prospect that the centennial year of the First World War will see the first large-scale conventional European war in decades has risen exponentially.

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 02:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
What the fuck are you going on about?

After Putin gobbled up Ossetia the idea that he might go after other former soviet states didn't seem like all that much of a stretch. Of course the suggestion that he might do just that was met with laughter and derision.

Now here we are.

The point being how many times does "smart diplomacy" have to get caught with it's pants down before it stops being smart? Likewise for "idiots" and flashes of insight/non-idiocy.

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 04:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
And yet here we are. What's your point?

(no subject)

Date: 2/3/14 15:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
The argument is not that Putin necessarily could have been stopped, but more that the idea of coddling him as opposed to being firm opposition was the wrong idea. The response to noting that Putin's aspirations went beyond, that Ukraine was going to be a target, that reset button diplomacy was the wrong idea, that Russia was probably our top geopolitical rival, all were met with derision.

Those opposed to Obama's Russia policy were right, and have been for years.

(no subject)

Date: 4/3/14 03:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Some ideas that have already been proposed.

* Don't go to the G-8 meeting in Sochi
* Pointedly have a G-7 meeting in Poland Finland or Latvia.
* Open US oil and gas exports to eastern Europe, expand our offshore exploration and drilling efforts in the process, send American drilling crews to help Poland and Western Ukrain exploit thier domestic reservs thus robbing putin of his non-military leverage.
* Conduct some small but visible exercises with the Poles and Lats.
* Ask Poland if they still want US military aid and bases, if so build them.
* Find out what the Germans, Fins, and Poles are planning, if anything back them up with real and visible material support.
* I'm guessing that the NSA already knows where Putin and his cronies keep their offshore bank accounts, if not they damn well should, it'd be a shame if something were to happen to that money.

(no subject)

Date: 4/3/14 04:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
By hitting them where it hurts, namely the wallet and the ego, without the actual requirement of bombing anyone. Just a second ago you were accusing me of being too aggressive, now I'm not aggressive enough? make up your mind. Likewise weren't you just saying that "only an idiot rattles a saber in the expectation that it has to actually be used"? how does that square with your assertion that the only way to stop military aggression is by using actual soldiers?

PS: I am fully aware of Russia and Finland's shared history. In fact, their reputation as "Russian military Kryptonite" is exactly why I think we should be cozying up to them in the first place.

(no subject)

Date: 4/3/14 04:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Predictably, you seem to have forgotten W's response to the Georgia invasion.

(no subject)

Date: 4/3/14 18:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Unlikely. But it's easier to make noise in the cheap seats where there are no consequences.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30