Rendering Unto Caesar: Piercing the Pentagonian Corporate Veil‏

[sophia-sadek.livejournal.com]

We had an incident at our test facility that gave us some insight into the way that American military priorities are established. A representative from the American military began to make noise about the intellectual propriety of neural wave technology. The man claimed the technology to be private property demanded monopoly status in its application and licensing. One of our guys pointed out that the military guy seemed to be more interested in protecting private investors from competition than in protecting American citizens from loose cannons on the martial deck.

One of the ironies about the issue is that some of the major investors in American military industries are not citizens of the US. Pentagonian personnel value the property rights of non-American investors at the expense of the rights of economically marginalized Americans of non-Roman religious affiliations. The Pentagonians clearly favor the artificial right of intellectual property over the more natural right to pursue happiness. They value the lives and experiences of affluent industrial investors more than those of the majority of Americans.

Military industrialists developed neural wave technology for use by organizations such as the CIA and the Pentagon. It has a wide range of civilian applications that make it desirable for general commercial use. The original patent holders stand to gain considerably from its civilian application. The problem that they face is that they need a legitimate governing entity in order to enforce their patent claims.

Pentagonia is not a truly American institution, nor is it under legitimate governmental oversight. It has long been an instrument of extra-American interests with a revolving door between military and industrial organizations. The top brass have more concern for the interests of non-American industrial investors than they have for those of Joe Sixpack or Jane Hockeymom. Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial monster was on target.

What would you suggest as a solution to the thuggish brutality of the Pentagon? Do military investors deserve to profit from the hard work of civilian entrepreneurs? Were the founding padres on target when they said that a standing army is a threat to liberty?

Links: Wikipedia article on the basis of research into neural wave technology.

Comments

[sophia-sadek.livejournal.com]

There are some guys who posted youtube videos describing their experiences of being harassed. As for first hand accounts of psychotic experiences, there are also a number of people who have written about their recovery. John Nash's experience is recounted in his biography as well as in some of his interviews.

[kylinrouge.livejournal.com]

John Nash is schizophrenic, not affected my neural wave machines. Funny enough, there are accounts of schizophrenia causing paranoid delusions revolving around mind control machines.

I guess if all this movement has is youtube videos, it's probably not going anywhere. Chemtrails have the same volume but it doesn't make it any more legitimate. Peer reviewed study is the only purveyor of truth.

[sophia-sadek.livejournal.com]

I never contended that Nash was a target of neural wave harassment. I merely mentioned him as an example of someone who has described his hallucinations. Psychiatrists have no test to determine whether or not a patient is the target of electronic harassment. They simply assume that complaints are symptomatic of disorder whether they are or not. There is no single definition or test for schizophrenia. It is a label that is associated with a variety of conditions, including those who complain of electronic harassment. If you believe that peer reviewed studies are infallible, then you are just as devout as those who believe the same about the pope. Also, it is a symptom of scientism to claim that there is no truth outside of scientific inquiry.