Unnecessary shutdowns
5/10/13 17:42![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The federal government is shutting down a lot of things that are either don't need to be shut down (because they cost no money to operate) or actually cost more to shut down than they do to keep operating. These include both national parks and government agency websites.
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/10/84362-13-national-parks-impacted-government-shutdown/
http://reason.com/blog/2013/10/02/government-will-shut-down-websites-even
We're at the point where the government is just being petty and working on zooming well past that point.
For those who think it's justified because the Republicans won't budge on Obamacare, that just doesn't fit the facts.

As a libertarian, I'm fine with permanently cutting 800,000 federal workers and I think it's nice that they've identified the agencies we can do without, but I'd rather it happen with at least the standard 2-week warning for people. Pretty much all politicians in office right now are acting like children, but that's what happens when the electorate is also.
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/10/84362-13-national-parks-impacted-government-shutdown/
http://reason.com/blog/2013/10/02/government-will-shut-down-websites-even
We're at the point where the government is just being petty and working on zooming well past that point.
For those who think it's justified because the Republicans won't budge on Obamacare, that just doesn't fit the facts.

As a libertarian, I'm fine with permanently cutting 800,000 federal workers and I think it's nice that they've identified the agencies we can do without, but I'd rather it happen with at least the standard 2-week warning for people. Pretty much all politicians in office right now are acting like children, but that's what happens when the electorate is also.
(no subject)
Date: 6/10/13 23:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/10/13 00:33 (UTC)And they certainly are present at parks. Parks that need to be patrolled for the safety of visitors and to prevent people entering the park from taking things from them.
(no subject)
Date: 7/10/13 01:12 (UTC)Many parks I can understand closing down, as I've said elsewhere. However, the NPS has tried to close down many state parks because the receive federal subsides. Gov. Walker has already refused these request because the parks in question only receive 18% of their budgets from the federal government. Maybe they should have informed them they won't be getting that 18%, instead of ordering them shutdown? Not exactly an amount that would cripple them.
You say those on the right are being "colossally stupid," but I'm not seeing the logic in a lot of the actions of the NPS, unless their actions are meant to specifically make life hard on people, and as one park ranger (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/3/pruden-the-cheap-tricks-of-the-game/) put it: “We’ve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It’s disgusting.”