![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
http://freeadam.net/2013/05/24/adam-kokesh-march-50-state-capitols/
So that idiot who wanted to bring around 10,000 armed people to the Capital to provide a demonstration of willingness to 'defend' rights by provoking a firefight in the event that this demonstration without a permit had gone off now revealed his true colors.He's called for an army of secessionists to menace the United States. Except that this is the 21st Century. No army can menace a government that can spy on its enemies from space. No army can succeed in such an endeavor here, and if such idiocy must be unleashed, it is only justifiable if it can win its war that it sets for itself to fight. In the 21st Century no such thing like this is possible.
The people who agitate most loudly for the Second Amendment as a license to commit treason neglect that the Constitution empowers the Feds to use all due force in the event of a domestic insurrection. Of course I expect that there'll be a lot of comments to this arguing that his call for an army of treason to march on state capitals really isn't a call for that, that never say what it really is. That's predictable. So would be the prospect that once again, like that damn fool earlier in the Obama Administration that threatened to 'do something' if Obama didn't resign and Ted Nugent, who predicted he'd be dead by now that nothing at all happens. But this is why people can be and are skeptical of the so-called Second Amendment crowd. Because the right to keep and bear firearms is no guarantee against a tyranny these days, and any pretense it is will end up with a lot of dead people and a war already lost. And it's even more interesting how the people who damn Communists, Hamas, and Hezbollah, as well as the Taliban, also turn around during these kind of discussions and argue that they should emulate the folly of the people they hold as terrorists and the antithesis of freedom and of all that is best in humanity.
So that idiot who wanted to bring around 10,000 armed people to the Capital to provide a demonstration of willingness to 'defend' rights by provoking a firefight in the event that this demonstration without a permit had gone off now revealed his true colors.He's called for an army of secessionists to menace the United States. Except that this is the 21st Century. No army can menace a government that can spy on its enemies from space. No army can succeed in such an endeavor here, and if such idiocy must be unleashed, it is only justifiable if it can win its war that it sets for itself to fight. In the 21st Century no such thing like this is possible.
The people who agitate most loudly for the Second Amendment as a license to commit treason neglect that the Constitution empowers the Feds to use all due force in the event of a domestic insurrection. Of course I expect that there'll be a lot of comments to this arguing that his call for an army of treason to march on state capitals really isn't a call for that, that never say what it really is. That's predictable. So would be the prospect that once again, like that damn fool earlier in the Obama Administration that threatened to 'do something' if Obama didn't resign and Ted Nugent, who predicted he'd be dead by now that nothing at all happens. But this is why people can be and are skeptical of the so-called Second Amendment crowd. Because the right to keep and bear firearms is no guarantee against a tyranny these days, and any pretense it is will end up with a lot of dead people and a war already lost. And it's even more interesting how the people who damn Communists, Hamas, and Hezbollah, as well as the Taliban, also turn around during these kind of discussions and argue that they should emulate the folly of the people they hold as terrorists and the antithesis of freedom and of all that is best in humanity.
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 12:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 12:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 14:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 14:27 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 16:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 14:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:18 (UTC)"What?" a few people said, batting their eyes and blushing prettily. "Violent? Why, there's nothing VIOLENT about someone just, kinda, well... Showing you a loaded gun in the course of an argument..."
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 1/6/13 18:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:20 (UTC)(Even if you are tempted to say that a citizen rebellion is not "War" by the Constitution, the President is still charged with "defending the Constitution", which would certainly cover people trying to overthrow the government.)
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:27 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:32 (UTC)Sounds like something you might hear at an OWS meeting.
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:39 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:41 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 15:58 (UTC)Personally, I thought a lot more like that lover of liberty and true patriot, Ron Paul.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 16:20 (UTC)The criticism is not aimed at simply being disgruntled at the government, it is aimed at the potential danger that could come from marching on our nation's capital with loaded guns, either disguising a protest as an out-and-out civil war or vise versa.
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 16:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 17:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 21:53 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 16:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 17:10 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 16:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 18:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 19:50 (UTC)His words: Adam killed people in that war. He killed them on orders of people he no longer respects. Think he wont kill those who sent him to war, or even think about it?
Adam Kokesh is a problem created by that war (http://www.soundclick.com/util/downloadSong.cfm?ID=2706103) of choice in Iraq.
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 20:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 20:56 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 31/5/13 02:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/5/13 03:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/5/13 04:05 (UTC)I think the government knowing they are out there is pretty good insurance that we won't have to use them against the government.
(no subject)
Date: 31/5/13 11:33 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: