[identity profile] d-zhukovf.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Tomorrow Russia celebrates The Victory Day (over nazi Germany). During The World War II Germany attacked USSR on 22 of June 1941 and capitulated at 22:43 on 8 of may 1945. It was already 9 of May in Moscow, so in Russia the Victory Day is celebrated on 9 of May.
I recommend to visit a very informative site that represents the Russian view on war. Rare photos and videos from the fronts, interview with former soldiers of that war, the whole story of Eastern front from heavy first defeats to great victory in Berlin. The Russian site is translated into English. Here is the link:

http://english.pobediteli.ru/flash.html

P.S.

I will give my opinion as it is needed for this community.
Russian society is split into many political groups but for all of them Victory Day remains a sacret date. USSR lost 26 million people (not to mention wounded)in that war. Millions got in German concentration camps and died there. But It seems that for many people in western countries "Soviet period" of World war II is almost unknown. So this site is going to inform those who are interested in the history of WWII.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 14:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
I've been a great fan of this website for years, but could you please amend your post to include at least some personal opinion, as per this requirement (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/261191.html)? 2 hours should suffice, I hope.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 17:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Thanks for doing the amendment.

Now on the subject. Is Putin planning to do some promotion of this day abroad? Because I think it's totally in his style (and capabilities) to herald to the world that this is a great day for Russia and the world, and I'm sure he'll find ways to do it in the most pompous and grandeur way possible ;)

Btw May 9 is also Europe Day, and it was chosen for a reason.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 17:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Well, he's not exactly alien to parading his nationalism, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

I'm rather asking because I'm planning to visit (Piter, though) later this summer and I expect to experience some of all that grandeur - it's his home city after all ;)

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 19:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
He's not nationalist enough for the ultra-nationalists, that's for sure.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 20:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Okay (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcXyoncArDA)...

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 21:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Well, apparently the guy self-identifies as a moderate nationalist (in his words). That's what the video is about. Whether you consider him such or not, is of course your prerogative.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 14:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Please read rules #6 & #8 of this community, thanks in advance.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 15:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Americans tend to ignore anything outside of America. They generally do not like to recognize the sacrifice made by Russians and other Soviets during WW II. I recall an occasion of celebration of the end of the war during the Reagan years. American officials turned their noses up at the celebration in order to protest the shooting of an American soldier who was engaged in espionage. Some American citizens showed up to the celebration in the town of Torgau (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torgau) to make up for the official protest. It was quite an event.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 17:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
There has been some speculation that Truman used the A-bomb in Japan to prevent the Soviets from occupying more territory that had been under Japanese control. Others have speculated that it was done to demonstrate the weapon and a willingness to use it, especially to the Soviet leadership.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 21:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
I would be interested in knowing the American plans to bomb USSR with nukes. Which one of the two bombs were we going to attack the USSR with - Fat Man or Little Boy?

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 16:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
Don't let [livejournal.com profile] underlankers see your opinion: he's been trying to educate everyone on this comm about how Russia won WWII for years.

But it is true every nation is a bit inward-looking and selective when it comes to history.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 21:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Hmm, I missed the distinction. The OP and Under seem to make the same point. IDGI?

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 22:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I get that on AH.com, too. What I try to educate people on is that the Allies won WWII, the Soviets, USA, and UK all together. The USSR no more won WWII by bloodshed than the USA won by spending money.

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 05:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
'twas meant as light-hearted ribbing, rather than a statement of fact.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 17:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
I only watched the flash play through the eastern front war, very nice to see it happen on a timeline, we're all aware of some battles like Stalingrad but it's great to see it all unfold

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 17:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
All the authentic documented materials are good too, especially the video and audio records.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 19:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Not very strange. Stalingrad became the symbol of heroism and resilience. Kursk was mostly a tactical game of numbers and heavy machines.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 20:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Yes I'm not contesting that. And in the Battle of Salsu from the Gogureyo-Sui Wars in 612, China and Korea lost 300,000+ casualties. That's not the point I'm making.
Edited Date: 8/5/12 20:33 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 01:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Stalingrad was when the West had no soldiers in Europe. Kursk is around the time they invaded Sicily. The West naturally focused more on the Soviet war when the Soviets were the only Allies to fight in Europe in European WWII. Afterward, the process of attempting to minimize Allied dependence on Stalinism began during WWII itself.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 22:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
I watched that entire flash movie. It's amazing how close we were to a Nazi world in 1941.

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 02:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
More amazing is the degree to which modern scholarship has revealed we actually were never on the brink of a Nazi world. David Glantz's works, especially Clash of Titans, Barbarossa Derailed, The Siege of Leningrad and Kursk as well as Tooze's Wages of Destruction and Overy's Why the Allies Won are all examples of modern scholarship that have exposed a number of greatly ironic realities.

1) The only bunch to enter WWII prepared for mechanized *war* was the Soviets. They, however, had major problems thanks to the Purges. Blitzkrieg never existed as a doctrine, it was the product of desperate gambles and became one only in retrospect.

2) In reality the smartest German in the German war machine was none other than Adolf Hitler. He was no idiot damn fool, he was actually a clever, malevolent douchebag who knew what he was doing a bit too much. The German victories up to 1943 were primarily Hitler, not the generals. They, however, with the full aiding and abetting of the US military wrote a coverup that excused their direct participation in and carrying out of warcrimes and created a new Stab in the Back Legend to make this plausible. Given how much of a complete monster Hitler was, it took a brave man to question this myth.

3) As a result of these modern scholars, what we know now is that Barbarossa was a bad plan well-executed, the Soviet MP-40 was a horrible plan catastrophically executed, but after the first 14 days the Soviets raised about 20X the number of divisions the Germans thought their entire army consisted of, leading to a process that in the Battle of Moscow ended Germany's logistical capability to win the war. Stalingrad ended their ability to launch a strategic offensive, Kursk showed they couldn't even get a tactical offensive. Bagration broke their back. So, ironically, the 1941 victories were illusions, not reflections of reality, which reflected more on the Allies than it did on the Germans, including on the Soviets.

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 03:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
What about Leningrad? According to the flash movie it was the earliest city to weather a siege without falling. It was still under siege long before the Third Reich ever got to Stalingrad, and was still under siege long after.
Edited Date: 9/5/12 03:59 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 13:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Most of the Soviet fighting there was written out of Moscow's postwar histories. The reason of course was that here the Germans inflicted the greatest number of asskickings it was in them to do. However the USSR managed to relieve the Siege because the attrition process ultimately did favor them. Moscow had a great deal of cynicism in how it approached its history of the war, and as many as 40% of the USSR's battles were written out of the war due to the Soviet decision to cover up their mistakes.

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 06:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Reminds me of Fatherland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherland_(novel)), the novel and the movie.

(no subject)

Date: 9/5/12 20:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
If Japan did, USSR would've been boned. They could've made it to Moscow long before the Germans.

(no subject)

Date: 8/5/12 23:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I find it fascinating that a war where the "little" battles might involve as many as a million people all told on both sides has been as thoroughly rewritten and forgotten as this one has. OTOH, I don't think it's right to say the USSR's war began in 1941. Poland in particular might have a bone to pick with that date. I think that the Axis-Soviet War is forgotten for a number of reasons in the West, the most cruel for the Cold War being that the USSR ran over half of Europe with US trucks, eating Spam. It does no good to the West to admit that the Eastern Bloc was its own creation. Nor does it aid Soviet propaganda to admit that its Cold War enemy *made* its Empire. But then historical reality does that to self-serving myths. The Russian Federation, I will give it credit for this, is the only WWII belligerent to have looked at the real war. If only its enemies and allies could be similarly honest. >.>

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031