[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics


From Statepress:

Arizona House Bill 2625, authored by Majority Whip Debbie Lesko, R-Glendale, would permit employers to ask their employees for proof of medical prescription if they seek contraceptives for non-reproductive purposes, such as hormone control or acne treatment.


‘I believe we live in America. We don’t live in the Soviet Union,’ Lesko said. ‘So, government should not be telling the organizations or mom and pop employers to do something against their moral beliefs.’


Jezebel points out that Arizona is an “at will” state. This means that bosses in Arizona will be able to fire women for being depraved enough to take birth control pills to prevent pregnancy.

As we all know, what made the Soviet Union infamous were not the gulags, its treatment of dissidents, and the rigid control over the press, but the fact that women could take pills for the purpose of contraception without fear of losing their jobs over it.

Yes, here it is -- the right wing's idea of "freedom" is a society where a woman has to ask her boss' permission to use oral contraceptives.

Does anyone else find this more than a little weird?

Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes

(no subject)

Date: 16/3/12 12:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
Oh, I beg to differ...

One important thing the Title X funds allow Unity to do is to have all the various forms of contraception on hand for patients on the spot.

Also...

Only 5 percent of Title X-supported clinic clients came only for contraceptives; nearly 9 in 10 obtained preventive gynecologic care, and more than half received services related to sexually transmitted or reproductive tract infections.

Of the 7,000 or so family planning clinics nationwide, 4,500 receive Title X funding. About 60 percent of the clinics receiving the funding are operated by state, county or local health departments; 14 percent are operated by Planned Parenthood. The rest are run by a "variety of other types of agencies."


And the great news is that even though a portion of the funds go to Planned Parenthood, not one dime of it can be used toward abortions. :)

Anything else?

http://www.npr.org/2011/04/01/135018313/at-risk-federal-funds-cover-far-more-than-the-pill
Edited Date: 16/3/12 12:31 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 16/3/12 18:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Nice to know you support a federal health program.

(no subject)

Date: 16/3/12 21:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
In this case, yes. There's a difference between Title X and a full-fledged government handout that bleeds the economy dry like Obamacare.

(no subject)

Date: 17/3/12 03:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Actually, CBO estimates say Obamacare will lower the deficit.

(no subject)

Date: 18/3/12 07:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
Are you talking about the latest CBO estimates? The footnotes on the first page point out that the estimates DO NOT include federal administrative costs AND gross costs of the coverage are increasing by $50 billion, and net costs are only offset by a small amount.

People need to actually take the time to read these things...

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
262728293031