![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
One of the differences between science and religion is that the former learns from experience and the latter suffers from petrifaction in the sense that it refuses to learn. The prohibition of sacred substances is one of the areas where religion falls down again and again. It is also an area where science has a great deal yet to learn. White smocked clinicians continue to narrow their gaze on the biochemical aspects of substance use without considering a whole host of cultural aspects. In their effort to get at the essence of the problem, they have boiled away its vitality. (In the Roman tradition, the only time a substance is considered sacred is when an official magician has spoken authoritative mumbo-jumbo over it.)
When the distinct cultures of ancient Europe and pre-Columbian America began to mingle, they exchanged the products of their respective societies. Europeans obtained tobacco from America and Native Americans obtained alcohol from Europeans. The earliest American trade laws on record relate to the tobacco trade. Likewise, Jesuits made an attempt to regulate the brandy trade with Natives. These were not the only objects of commerce, but they were at the top of the heap. Animal fur was almost as important as tobacco to Europeans and gun powder was almost as important as liquor to Natives. (Jesuits were notoriously fond of chocolate.)
England and France fell into a vicious competition to establish a trade monopoly with America. English merchants lured commerce away from French channels with a product far more potent and significantly less costly than the French were selling. At one event, twenty braves died of alcohol poisoning for lack of prior experience with the English brew. This prompted the French to accuse the English of deliberately poisoning the Natives to death.
A similar accusation of deliberate destruction arose when crack cocaine replaced cannabis in the pockets of ghetto street pharmacists. I recall the occasion when the change was made. It was as harsh as the transition to a new, more seductive LJ interface. Suddenly, a trip to the street retailers for herbal delights became a fruitless pursuit. Crack was the only thing available. A switch had been thrown behind Adam Smith's invisible hand that was as pernicious as the switch from the French grape to the English sugar cane.
What do you think of sacred substances and the public policy of control?
When the distinct cultures of ancient Europe and pre-Columbian America began to mingle, they exchanged the products of their respective societies. Europeans obtained tobacco from America and Native Americans obtained alcohol from Europeans. The earliest American trade laws on record relate to the tobacco trade. Likewise, Jesuits made an attempt to regulate the brandy trade with Natives. These were not the only objects of commerce, but they were at the top of the heap. Animal fur was almost as important as tobacco to Europeans and gun powder was almost as important as liquor to Natives. (Jesuits were notoriously fond of chocolate.)
England and France fell into a vicious competition to establish a trade monopoly with America. English merchants lured commerce away from French channels with a product far more potent and significantly less costly than the French were selling. At one event, twenty braves died of alcohol poisoning for lack of prior experience with the English brew. This prompted the French to accuse the English of deliberately poisoning the Natives to death.
A similar accusation of deliberate destruction arose when crack cocaine replaced cannabis in the pockets of ghetto street pharmacists. I recall the occasion when the change was made. It was as harsh as the transition to a new, more seductive LJ interface. Suddenly, a trip to the street retailers for herbal delights became a fruitless pursuit. Crack was the only thing available. A switch had been thrown behind Adam Smith's invisible hand that was as pernicious as the switch from the French grape to the English sugar cane.
What do you think of sacred substances and the public policy of control?
(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:31 (UTC)As for the smell of urine, it would take trainloads of the stuff to mask the aroma.
(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 22:50 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 17:53 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 18:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 18:17 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 18:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 19:23 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 07:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 22:03 (UTC)Exactly how much sense did this make to you when you wrote it?
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:11 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 22:07 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 22:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/12/11 23:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:22 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 00:07 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 18:03 (UTC)