Talk politics.

The US involvement in Ukraine's post-war peace and reconstruction efforts is not solely humanitarian or ideological. It is also heavily influenced by strategic economic interests, especially access to Ukraine's vast reserves of critical minerals. These resources are vital for US goals related to clean energy, defense and technology, including the production of batteries, semiconductors and renewable infrastructure. Ukraine's resource wealth positions it as a linchpin in America's broader geopolitical and economic strategy.

In early 2025, the US and Ukraine formalised their cooperation with the Ukraine - US Mineral Resources Agreement. This pact includes the creation of a joint Reconstruction Investment Fund, into which Ukraine will contribute 50% of future revenues from its state-owned natural resource assets. In return, the US commits to long-term financial backing aimed at stabilising and rebuilding Ukraine's economy. The deal reflects a deliberate US move to secure influence over resource flows while supporting Ukraine's post-war reconstruction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–United_States_Mineral_Resources_Agreement

Critics, however, raise concerns about the implications of this arrangement. Organisations like Global Witness argue that binding Ukraine's economic recovery and sovereignty to its resource exploitation risks turning the country into a commodities supplier beholden to foreign interests. There are fears that peace negotiations and reconstruction efforts could be skewed to benefit multinational corporations and donor nations, sidelining the interests and rights of Ukrainian citizens, particularly those in resource-rich regions.

Ultimately, the US appears to be intertwining its support for Ukraine's peace process with a longer-term strategy to secure mineral supply chains and extend its influence in Eastern Europe. While framed as mutual cooperation, the economic structure of the deal suggests a deeper scramble for control over the region's natural wealth, raising ethical and geopolitical questions about the nature of foreign involvement in post-conflict rebuilding.

Hmmm. Greenland possesses significant, largely untapped, mineral resources, inc. rare earth elements, graphite, lithium, and other critical minerals:

PDF MAP

A lot of that is in areas that hold special value and rights to the locals. I know ethnic cleansing for resources is an American tradition, but I kinda hoped that was in the past. But alas.

Trump's lust for taking Greenland is so obvious. It has nothing to do with the security of the US. It is nothing more than a land grab for Greenland's resources. Worse, he is willing to use force, he says, to take Greenland.

The arm-twisting for Ukraine's resources for the sake of a stop of the Russian attacks is also quote telling.