Iconic images of history
15/11/11 12:51By special request from some lovely peoples, I shifted this from TPN.
From this mornings OSW sweep in NYC

To say this is disgusting is being kind with my words.
There have been many photos that have literally changed the world. Frame 313 of the Zapruder Film. Ruby killing Oswald. Buddists monks self-immolating. Saigon'smayor Police Chief murdering a helpless man. Hippys putting flowers in the barrels of soldiers rifles. Burning Towers.
Can this image be a paradigm shifter? What do you see when you view this? How do you feel inside?
Game changer; how much apathy and fear will be replaced by anger, and motivation? How many new 'domestic terrorists' are putting this image on their bedroom walls?
If you were not politically sympathetic to the OWS movement, are you still secure in your belief this image shows a good man and a bad man, and the good man is the one wearing white?
ETA: some require more photos as evidence this cop (NYPD Captain, look at his collar) was not merely asking the citizen if they wanted to do-se-do with him.
source
From this mornings OSW sweep in NYC

To say this is disgusting is being kind with my words.
There have been many photos that have literally changed the world. Frame 313 of the Zapruder Film. Ruby killing Oswald. Buddists monks self-immolating. Saigon's
Can this image be a paradigm shifter? What do you see when you view this? How do you feel inside?
Game changer; how much apathy and fear will be replaced by anger, and motivation? How many new 'domestic terrorists' are putting this image on their bedroom walls?
If you were not politically sympathetic to the OWS movement, are you still secure in your belief this image shows a good man and a bad man, and the good man is the one wearing white?
ETA: some require more photos as evidence this cop (NYPD Captain, look at his collar) was not merely asking the citizen if they wanted to do-se-do with him.
source
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 17:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 17:56 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 17:56 (UTC)quit ducking the meta
Date: 15/11/11 17:58 (UTC)after?... people violently went to jail for exercizing the same rights.
Re: quit ducking the meta
From:Re: quit ducking the meta
From:Re: quit ducking the meta
From:Re: quit ducking the meta
From:Re: quit ducking the meta
From:Re: quit ducking the meta
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:02 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Yes, but
From:Re: Yes, but
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:more images? here you go
From:Re: more images? here you go
From:Re: more images? here you go
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:You da man!
From:Re: You da man!
From:Re: You da man!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:02 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:02 (UTC)If so, that was NOT "murdering a helpless man". "Summary execution", maybe. The shooter was Nguyễn Ngọc Loan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Ngoc_Loan), head of RVN's National Police. Nguyễn Văn Lém (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguy%E1%BB%85n_V%C4%83n_L%C3%A9m), the shootee, had been caught pretty much literally red-handed after the murder of several National Police officers and/or their families.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:05 (UTC)You call it justified all you want. That is the difference between us. What I see is murder of a helpless prisoner.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:What is the military rank of a Police Chief?
From:Re: What is the military rank of a Police Chief?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:04 (UTC)On topic, no I sadly do not see it as a game changer. As we can already see here those who support the protests will be outraged and those that don't will find a way to justify. I don't see this photo changing anyone's minds.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/11/11 01:03 (UTC)The picture itself is less clear. The man bleeding isn't trying to protect himself from the soldier, he appears to be looking behind him, as if he's worried about what is behind him. The soldier doesn't appear to be engaging the man or even making eye contact with him. He could be threatening whomever the bleeding man is looking at behind him, or the photographer.
So, what is the backstory? Was there a conflict and that dude got hurt?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:10 (UTC)It's hard to tell what exactly is the story behind the picture (I had to take it into Photoshop and adjust the levels just to get a little more clarity).
I see an angry cop in an aggressive stance and a woman who is taking cover. The angry cop is facing the camera and not the woman. One of the things learned in martial arts is that when someone is attacking you they generally don't turn away from you.
That's not to say that he didn't just hit her. I'm not going to defend police behavior that crosses the line, but I feel there's a lot of missing context here. Lacking enough at least to give me pause about committing one particular reading of it.
Do you have an accompanying article describing the event?
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:11 (UTC)The person in front of the tank was not protesting, they were shopping at the local store and accidentally walked in front of a tank procession at a Party rally.
See how it's fun to assign your own narrative to a picture, and strip away all the context?
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 18:54 (UTC)Now, speaking of images with potent overtones:
Date: 15/11/11 19:17 (UTC)Who was actually hung for it? Isn't this the flip-side of the photographs that change everything, the photographs that not only change nothing but enable easy injustices?
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 19:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 19:44 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 20:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 20:08 (UTC).... :/
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 20:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 20:15 (UTC)I remember a time of iconic images.
Date: 15/11/11 21:13 (UTC)Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
Date: 15/11/11 21:16 (UTC)Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:Re: I remember a time of iconic images.
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 21:26 (UTC)This image shows nothing of the sort, and is not relevant to my political opinion of the movement.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 21:35 (UTC)I never was. Were you?
They may both be bad, they may both be good, they may both be a mixture of the two and thus human.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/11 22:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/11/11 00:18 (UTC)I also have a video... but don't watch that because it shows the protester pushing him off his bike.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 16/11/11 02:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/11/11 04:37 (UTC)