(no subject)
30/10/11 11:40![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/313613
Second amendment rights. But only for Christians and McCain voters.
This is really dumb, and I'd like to see everyone in this comm agree that the owner of this store is violating the law and discriminating unjustly. That is my view, if there is another view out there, please, share it with me.
Second amendment rights. But only for Christians and McCain voters.
This is really dumb, and I'd like to see everyone in this comm agree that the owner of this store is violating the law and discriminating unjustly. That is my view, if there is another view out there, please, share it with me.
(no subject)
Date: 31/10/11 00:19 (UTC)^This cannot be squared with this:
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
(no subject)
Date: 31/10/11 01:44 (UTC)States' Rights arguments do not apply when constitutionally protected rights are at stake...
with:
Equal protection of the law.
I'm sorry, the mind is boggling, because you're usually the one who has a bitter reaction when someone mentions states' rights in a positive bent and in this case I'm on your side, and presumably you're not against the fourteenth's guarantee of equal protection either, so... either I'm missing something or there's a lack of real communication going on.
(no subject)
Date: 31/10/11 01:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/10/11 03:41 (UTC)In any case, I think I'm going to hang it up in the spirit of putting this whole post behind me, hoping that others do so as well.
Peace.