During an interview with a refugee from Iran, the topic of religious fundamentalism came up. The Iranian used a Sufi image as he depicted fundamentalists as "growing on the same hedge." Plato left us with a priceless body of literature that skewers the fundamentalists of his time and place. His work served as the inspiration for Galileo Galilei's seminal dialog debunking the dogma of his contemporaries. Michele Bachmann's recent jabs at Obama's execution of the Bush administration's Iraq withdrawal schedule gives us a shining example of the essence of the fundamentalist mind: it is a cesspool of contradictory concepts.
Mark Juergensmeyer describes his experience interviewing one of the Muslim fundamentalists involved in the assassination of Meir Kahane and involved in the first bombing of the World Trade Center. The man describes his experience with "secularism" as being like a pen without ink. His spiritual emptiness led him to pursue a path into the abyss of religious fundamentalism and self-defeating hate criminality. As he filled his spiritual void with the ink of human blood, he grew into the imbecile ridiculed by both Galileo and Plato. He embodied the vicious moral bankruptcy of human degradation at its most refined. He followed the path of the Carrier of Light as it led him deeper into the pit of depravity.
Muslim fundamentalists attack Sufis the way that Christian fundamentalists attack anyone with insight into the life and work of Jesus. If a Muslim fundamentalist met Mohammad on the road, Mohammad would meet his end at the hands of the fundamentalist. Like their Christian counterparts, Muslim fundamentalists have no clue that their piety comes across as pure, unadulterated horse manure.
The fundamentalist value statement is simple: "There is one God and we control him." The Sufi presents a counter example to this assertion in Islam the way that Socrates presented a counter example to the fundamentalists of ancient Athens and the way Jesus presents a counter example to Christian fundamentalists. The irony of someone professing to a monopoly on the divine is lost to the sorry saps who practice the vicious craft of religious fundamentalism.
My personal value statement is that a secular path is difficult, but that it is worth the pain and sorrow. Without the pain of falling down and breaking a bone we cannot experience the pleasure of recovery. There is an ink more sublime than that of sacrificial blood.
What do you consider to be your personal value statement?
Mark Juergensmeyer describes his experience interviewing one of the Muslim fundamentalists involved in the assassination of Meir Kahane and involved in the first bombing of the World Trade Center. The man describes his experience with "secularism" as being like a pen without ink. His spiritual emptiness led him to pursue a path into the abyss of religious fundamentalism and self-defeating hate criminality. As he filled his spiritual void with the ink of human blood, he grew into the imbecile ridiculed by both Galileo and Plato. He embodied the vicious moral bankruptcy of human degradation at its most refined. He followed the path of the Carrier of Light as it led him deeper into the pit of depravity.
Muslim fundamentalists attack Sufis the way that Christian fundamentalists attack anyone with insight into the life and work of Jesus. If a Muslim fundamentalist met Mohammad on the road, Mohammad would meet his end at the hands of the fundamentalist. Like their Christian counterparts, Muslim fundamentalists have no clue that their piety comes across as pure, unadulterated horse manure.
The fundamentalist value statement is simple: "There is one God and we control him." The Sufi presents a counter example to this assertion in Islam the way that Socrates presented a counter example to the fundamentalists of ancient Athens and the way Jesus presents a counter example to Christian fundamentalists. The irony of someone professing to a monopoly on the divine is lost to the sorry saps who practice the vicious craft of religious fundamentalism.
My personal value statement is that a secular path is difficult, but that it is worth the pain and sorrow. Without the pain of falling down and breaking a bone we cannot experience the pleasure of recovery. There is an ink more sublime than that of sacrificial blood.
What do you consider to be your personal value statement?
(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 17:20 (UTC)We already know...
Date: 27/10/11 17:32 (UTC)Re: We already know...
From:The movie with the best quotes in all movie history
Date: 27/10/11 18:19 (UTC)Re: The movie with the best quotes in all movie history
From:Re: The movie with the best quotes in all movie history
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 18:34 (UTC)wind up with a stomachache, a hangover, and a stranger knocked up from a one-night stand-die?(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 17:21 (UTC)Oh, sorry. That's my personal value proposition.
I love that song.
Date: 27/10/11 17:25 (UTC)Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:Re: I love that song.
From:I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:Re: I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:Re: I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:Re: I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:Re: I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:Re: I'm more of a Cross Movement pastor
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 17:23 (UTC)Same can be said for religion - it doesn't make you ignorant or hateful. People for and against it just use it as an excuse, so they don't have to address the true, obvious explanation - that some people are just fucking mean.
Gee...
Date: 27/10/11 17:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 15:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 17:36 (UTC)But...
Date: 27/10/11 17:42 (UTC)Where do you stand on the idea that people do vicious things out of personal choice rather than as a result of external inspiration?
Re: But...
From:Re: But...
From:(no subject)
From:Not to worry.
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 18:28 (UTC)You're one of the premier Catholic-bashers in this community yet Catholicism has plenty of its own pacific, peaceful mystics like St. Theresa of Avila and nobody tends to say that the Teresas outweigh the Donahues.
Too, Socrates was executed because he was tied to a group of tyrannoi that oppressed the Hell out of Athens and were all students of his, just as his disciple's disciple Alexander the Great went on to blaze Greek civilization across Asia very literally, burning down cities, libraries, and the like and renaming the ashes after himself.
Jesus also provides a counter to Christian fundamentalists only in that Jesus's teachings are always about God and Other-World, the fundamentalists focus on a narrow, limited God of This World. In terms of that focus on Other-World Jesus is just as fanatical to degrees that people tend to overlook when it comes to Jesus's own words in the Gospels themselves.
I disagree.
Date: 27/10/11 18:42 (UTC)Your spin on the trial of Socrates is interesting, but it does not jibe with what I have read. Yes, he got some blowback from the antics of Alcibiades, but his own nose thumbing at the authorities was probably more crucial in his prosecution.
Re: I disagree.
From:Re: I disagree.
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 19:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:But Plato...
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 23:38 (UTC)(no subject)
From:The...
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 19:28 (UTC)Spiritual schmiritual. Give me some bread.
(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 22:18 (UTC)Would that be...
From:Jesus v. Christian fundamentalists
Date: 27/10/11 19:41 (UTC)Will you please cite this counter example, that Jesus made to a group of his followers that did not yet exist?
Re: Jesus v. Christian fundamentalists
Date: 31/10/11 15:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 19:50 (UTC)With that kind of value statement...
Date: 31/10/11 15:25 (UTC)Re: With that kind of value statement...
From:Values?
Date: 27/10/11 20:38 (UTC)Insisting on dogma to run your life interesting consequences (http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/9707724121/1/tumblr_lqwjokBrOP1qii52v).
Re: Values?
Date: 31/10/11 15:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/10/11 22:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 00:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 00:25 (UTC)Something like this:
Morality is subjective, a lie, and a propaganda tool invented first by ancient religionists and then taken up by modern secular humanists. It is mainly used for brainwashing the masses away from what humans would naturally do when freed from all forms of thought-policing: Live for themselves.
Be wary of anyone who says "We're the good guys!" Mass murder, rape, and slavery may be imminent.
And this...
Date: 31/10/11 15:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 04:35 (UTC)How is any fracture recovery pleasurable?
I take it...
Date: 31/10/11 15:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/10/11 13:26 (UTC)The secular path...
Date: 31/10/11 15:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/10/11 04:20 (UTC)My personal value statement probably be: think for yourself, pursue worthwhile goals, have faith and don't expect too much from people.
I have met...
Date: 31/10/11 15:33 (UTC)