[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
In the UK at present, we have the smallest army we have had since the Boer War of Queen Victoria's time.

Is this a good thing or bad thing?
Will a smaller army, navy and air force stop our politicians from meddling in unnecessary wars in far off places? Will it lead to a focus on home defence instead of adventuring imperialism?

Or will a smaller Military Establishment mean that we are ill prepared to repel a foreign invasion ?
I mean, who is ~capable~ of invading Britain right now, even if they wanted to? Should be be paranoid about 'what if', or go for a realistic assessment of the actual threat level?

(no subject)

Date: 24/7/11 11:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
And have depended on their Navy, while Navies tend to be even more expsneive than Armies.

(no subject)

Date: 27/7/11 02:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
A navy makes more sense than an army for an island nation. I know it's where our main focus is; our airforce is essentially a naval support group.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30