![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Since we're about Religion Month... Here's what a prank an Austrian guy did the other day. Niko Alm applied for a driving license in Vienna, wearing a plastic colander on his head on the photo. Yep, a strainer for filtering spaghetti! And, surprise-surprise! The application was approved! Because Niko had explained that his strange headgear was a "pastafar", i.e. his religious hat. Here, look for yourselves!

This guy defines himself as an atheist, and follower of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. The website of this "movement" says that the only dogma in their doctrine is the rejection of any dogmas.
The Austrian police announced that his photo was approved because it had met the only important requirement: the citizen's face should be perfectly visible on the photo. They also explained that their decision had nothing to do with the guy's religious beliefs.
However, before the issuing of the driving license, Niko had to go through the regular psycho test to prove that he was able to drive a motor vehicle. And even after he passed the test successfully it took about a year for the document to be issued.
The eccentric guy says that since the Austrian authorities allow the issuing of official documents with all sorts of religious hats on the head, he should have the right to demonstrate his faith (or lack of it) as he pleases. I say bravo, Austria! And bravo, Niko. You've set a curious precedent, and touched on a deeper issue about religious tolerance, the freedom of confession and, if you like, on the burqa debate.

This guy defines himself as an atheist, and follower of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. The website of this "movement" says that the only dogma in their doctrine is the rejection of any dogmas.
The Austrian police announced that his photo was approved because it had met the only important requirement: the citizen's face should be perfectly visible on the photo. They also explained that their decision had nothing to do with the guy's religious beliefs.
However, before the issuing of the driving license, Niko had to go through the regular psycho test to prove that he was able to drive a motor vehicle. And even after he passed the test successfully it took about a year for the document to be issued.
The eccentric guy says that since the Austrian authorities allow the issuing of official documents with all sorts of religious hats on the head, he should have the right to demonstrate his faith (or lack of it) as he pleases. I say bravo, Austria! And bravo, Niko. You've set a curious precedent, and touched on a deeper issue about religious tolerance, the freedom of confession and, if you like, on the burqa debate.
(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 15:15 (UTC)That should be...
Date: 14/7/11 16:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:26 (UTC)off topic, but does anyone remember devo?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Hey you...
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:15 (UTC)- Can a woman wear a burqa on her passport photo? Yes/no.
- If no, can a woman wear a head-cloth on her passport photo? If yes, then why not the burqa?
- If no, can a guy wear a turban on his passport photo? Yes/no.
- If no, can a guy wear a Jew cap (can't remember its name)?
- If no, can they wear a piece of cutlery like this guy?
I think the debate is about defining the borders of acceptable religious symbols one could wear on an official document, and the debate could extend to what clothes are considered "acceptable" to wear in public. What if someone believes in the Sea Mermaid and their religion postulates that they should go around topless? Etc etc. I think it's a worthwhile debate.
(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:16 (UTC)Where can I vote for this?
(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I believe...
From:Re: I believe...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 13:19 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Silly superstitions
Date: 14/7/11 13:47 (UTC)Re: Silly superstitions
Date: 14/7/11 13:50 (UTC)Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
Date: 14/7/11 16:22 (UTC)Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:Re: Silly superstitions
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 14:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 15:10 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 15:29 (UTC)Also, for a visual -- Someone built a Lego model of the Church of the FSM's home temple: http://www.reasonablyclever.com/lego/fsm/
(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 14:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 14:07 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:pasta vision
Date: 14/7/11 15:43 (UTC)Re: pasta vision
Date: 14/7/11 16:12 (UTC)Re: pasta vision
From:Re: pasta vision
From:Although it seems recent...
Date: 14/7/11 16:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 16:21 (UTC)This act did the trick: soon after they changed the rules.
(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 17:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/11 17:22 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: