[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Back in the eighteenth century a scholar of religious literature published a dissertation on the founding of Christianity. His conclusions were repeated recently by Gerd Luedemann in his book of a similar title: Paul, the founder of Christianity. Both works fall short of their intended goal because they both fail to explore the way in which Paul's sect was chosen over the other sects as the One True Sect. Why, for example, were Pauline documents included in the canon while others were excluded? These works also tend to ignore the pre-Christian aspects of the Jesus-cum-Paul cult.

A much stronger candidate for the founder of Christianity is that famous founder of Istanbul. Upon that rock was Christianity built over the subsequent centuries reaching its greatest glory in the sixth century when it committed its most egregious acts of plunder and mayhem, planting the seed for the growth of Islam. Christianity belongs more to Caesar than it does to Paul, even though it elevates Paul into the pantheon of apostles.

Many aspects of the legend of Jesus contain elements of Pagan culture. Orion walked on water and a number of mystery schools bathed their initiates. Pagan philosophers hid their true meaning behind parabolic speech and ridiculed rich priests for their hypocrisy. On the other hand, there is no evidence to support the festival of Sol Invictus as the day that the Judeo-Pagan healer parted the lips of his maternal cocoon.

The opulence of the Vatican does not convince me that the Pontifex Maximus is a vicar of a wandering scholar from the Levant. Nor does it convince me that the office reflects a bridge to a higher realm. It seems more like a bridge to Pluto than to Jupiter. Perhaps the name should be change to Plutocratus Maximus.

Furthermore, Constantine was a sort of Second Coming for orthodoxy. He saved them from two of their enemies. On the one hand, they had been persecuted by Jews and Pagans who used them as scape goats. On the other hand, they were ridiculed by the more educated heterdoxy for clinging to the Pauline milk and failing to graduate to meatier material. Constantine provided the sect with the flaming cross with which they could attack both opponents. It is that same flaming cross that we see planted on lawns by more modern worshipers of Caesar.

Children of Constantine


To whom do you award the dubious honor of being the founder of Christianity.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 15:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I award that honor to Jesus of Nazareth. The idea that Christianity is inherently doomed to be the religion of the Sacking of Magdeburg, the 1204 Sacking of Constantinople, and the Taiping Rebellion ignores that Christianity in Abyssinia and India seems to have avoided the whole "Kill them all for God will know his own" mentality.

As far as Constantine and his successors, the Western Ashoka Maurya wasn't exactly all that successful. The Western Empire fell to a bunch of heretical tribal confederacies, and the Eastern remained intact but is ignored by everyone because the ERE is the spanner in the works of xenophobes.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 16:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
And as far as those pre-Christian aspects, while this is so in a few ways, the degree to which it is so tends to be exaggerated, and in Europe those aspects went into a nosedive following the Protestant and Catholic Reformations. Medieval Christianity, like the variants in South America, Voodoo, and North America to the Rio was very syncretic. Medieval Christendom also considered belief in witchcraft heresy, had a true universalist ambition, and was always and forever trying to destroy European states.

In a lot of ways the Medieval Church is the darling of latter-day anarchists who want to Smash the State without ever stopping to consider who or what fills that void.

Re: I would not...

From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: The sects of Thomas and Mark...

Date: 1/7/11 03:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
The Portuguese in India *were* rather brutal, sure. But then nobody gives a damn about the Oriental Orthodox, otherwise Mussolini would not be seen as the "good" fascist.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 16:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
I have no idea what you mean, but here's a very cute cat:


Image

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 16:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Look what you've done to Mr. Bigglesworth!!!
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 16:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Sorry, I only use kosher animated gifs.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 17:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paedraggaidin.livejournal.com
That cat is exactly like the one I had as a kid! Man I miss that cat.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 17:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
japanese version:



They're weird.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 16:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
I'm inclined to think that the origins of Christianity is so wrapped up in Judaism that Christianity could be said to begin when the Five Books of Moses were cast.

Re: Do you...

Date: 30/6/11 16:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
No, but it is a useful handle, like Homer with the Iliad.

Re: There was some dispute...

Date: 30/6/11 17:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
I think Jesus accepted entirely the Holy Scriptures that he had, and that he held himself out as the culmination of that history and its promise.

(no subject)

Date: 1/7/11 03:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I think that the 1st Century Jews, particularly Sicarii, and the 2nd Century followers of Simon Ben Kocheba might beg to differ on that account.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 03:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 11:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 13:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com - Date: 1/7/11 14:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 17:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Does this have something to do with that Zeitgeist movie? Because I have no clue where you are going with this.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 17:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
I'm trying to find the political relevance for sophia_sadek's cross-posts from some religious studies class but I can't see any.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 17:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
"It is that same flaming cross that we see planted on lawns by more modern worshipers of Caesar."

Image

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 20:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
I think I agree with this (I'm unsure if I'm interpreting the gif correctly). :)

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 20:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com
Post is beyond my knowledge of history.

Only things registering on radar involve parting the lips of maternal cocoons and second comings.

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031