![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Advocate corporal punishment and most people will scoff or recoil in horror. "What do you take us for? Barbarians?" seems to be the most common response. and yet, thanks to the "War on Drugs" and mandatory sentancing the US imprisons more citizens per capita than any other country in the western world. One month ago the US Supreme Court ruled that conditions in California prisons were unconstitutional, specifically that the prevalence overcrowding coupled with shoddy/non-existant medical treatment constitued cruel and unusual punishment. Furthermore the prevalence of rape in american prisons has been declared a humanitarian crisis by numerous watchdog groups.
It's a simple question really.
If given the choice between 10 years in a California prison or 10 lashes in the public square which would you choose?
Personally I'd choose the whip.
PS:
The above morally-framed argument completely ignores the economic incentive for corporal punishment, you don't have to spend ____ years feeding and housing a flogged prisoner and you do not loose a potentialy valuable member of the workforce. Though if the former is your chief concern we could just bring back chain gangs.
It's a simple question really.
If given the choice between 10 years in a California prison or 10 lashes in the public square which would you choose?
Personally I'd choose the whip.
PS:
The above morally-framed argument completely ignores the economic incentive for corporal punishment, you don't have to spend ____ years feeding and housing a flogged prisoner and you do not loose a potentialy valuable member of the workforce. Though if the former is your chief concern we could just bring back chain gangs.
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 05:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 06:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 06:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 06:13 (UTC)The problem is sifting through and figuring out who's the idiot and who's the real sociopath.
The whip isn't an option
Date: 21/6/11 06:35 (UTC)IBM, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT&T, Wireless, Texas Instrument, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com, Intel, Northern Telecom, TWA, Nordstrom's, Revlon, Macy's, Pierre Cardin, Target Stores, etc. all contract prison labour in the 37 states that allow it.
Now that crime is down, prison sentences will have to be longer to meet the demand of these contracts, and they already are. The California 3 strikes law was a real help to keep crime down, but fortunately we get to lock them up and make them productive members of society again as they work right inside the jails.
This is the ideal labourforce. It's domestic (not made in Taiwan), not unionized, fewer sick days, no personal days, never late, never complains (like who cares if they do?) and did I mention cheap? Holy shit these guys work for less then then kids we have chained up out in international waters. CHEAP!
Did you say some of these prisoners were raped? Oh no! Do they need to take some time off... LOL, I'm just joking with you. Nobody gives a shit about these pussies. They're friggin' criminals! Who gives a rats ass?
Corporal punishment isn't making a cheap labour force so it just isn't going to work. The future, just like the past, will have an economy based on
slavecheap ethnic labour.(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 06:36 (UTC)I agree with the 'temporary idiots' being fairly high, I know a few of these people and it's more impulse control problems than malice.
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 06:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 07:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 09:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 11:41 (UTC)Not to mention the reality show revenues.
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 11:53 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 12:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 13:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 14:54 (UTC)My Super Sweet Sixteen (http://www.mtv.com/shows/sweet_16/series.jhtml), anyone?
(First time poster)
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:42 (UTC)Would you like to propose an alternative?
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:47 (UTC)No.
Next question?
(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 17:48 (UTC)