(no subject)
20/6/11 08:38http://beta.news.yahoo.com/mccain-rips-republican-candidates-isolationism-165050541.html
John McCain and even Lindsey Graham have accussed the modern GOP and the currect presidential frontrunners of having an "isolationist" streak. That's an old song on the left but it's a bit of a surprise to hear it from old Republican hands like McCain and Graham.
One, I think this somewhat highlights the ever more noticable divide in ideology in the current GOP. Second, it's actually nice to see a bit of the old McCain rather than the shameless whore who traded most of his dignity for two failed runs at the White House and who brought the blight that is Sarah Palin to the national stage.
In any case, the Republican jockying for the candidate position might actually prove to be interesting. I think the GOP actually gets that dragged up some dusty old man to run against a younger, more dynamic candiate would just lead to a repeat of the Bob Dole fiasco. That would please no one but whoever writes jokes for Jay Leno and, of course, the Obama camp.
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 01:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 01:42 (UTC)What other McCain is there?
I can't take any criticism seriously from a dude who doesn't know how to use a computer.
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 07:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 02:11 (UTC)Needless to say, I like the words the Republican candidates are saying regarding interventionism, but I don't vote for words. And I don't buy the sincerity with which most of them are speaking about ending it either. I remember a certain candidate running a few years back on pulling out of our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He's in now, and we're still over there (and a few more places for good measure).
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 02:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 03:03 (UTC)"Our" friends?
Date: 20/6/11 18:19 (UTC)Re: "Our" friends?
Date: 20/6/11 21:13 (UTC)Re: "Our" friends?
Date: 20/6/11 22:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 19:44 (UTC)Maybe, we should let them do it again.
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 03:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 03:06 (UTC)(altho I AM for defunding the UN, the rest of it, is almost "whatever"
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 04:47 (UTC)TBH, that anyone should ask such a question in this day and age is more than a little frightening. Does the right wing not have any concept whatsoever of the fact that the world is changing, and we need to keep up with it just to survive? Or are they still living in this happy-go-lucky, Leave-it-to-Beaver vision of 1950s America? It's interesting that they point to the fifties as a great example of a booming American economy, while conveniently overlooking the fact that the tax rate on incomes of $300K+ was at one point as high as 91%. Gee, think that might have had something to do with it?
Of course not, according to the right wing. Just like the fact that the revenue lost through the Bush tax cuts nearly equaled the current social security shortfall.
Cutting taxes is the GOP's religion--it hasn't worked for years, but they still believe in it.
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 19:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 02:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 19:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/6/11 02:57 (UTC)Idealistically, given my own personal inclinations, I'd tell every else in the world to "go pound sand"
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 14:56 (UTC)The policy position that any Republican presidential candidate takes is totally irrelevant as it is required to be absurd to the point of insanity (http://www.fareedzakaria.com/home/Articles/Entries/2011/616_How_Todays_Conservatism_Lost_Touch_with_Reality.html) in order to win the primaries. What they need is someone who is sufficiently charismatic that the swing voters will not care that s/he is spouting nonsense. I don't see that right now, but it's still early days.
(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 22:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 23:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/6/11 19:46 (UTC)Not a strong believer in allowing the blind to color match ones clothing?