Damon Fowler, a graduating senior at Bastrop High School in Louisiana, recently took a principled stand on the school’s consistent flouting of the law:
My graduation from high school is this Friday. I live in the Bible Belt of the United States. The school was going to perform a prayer at graduation, but due to me sending the superintendent an email stating it was against Louisiana state law and that I would be forced to contact the ACLU if they ignored me, they ceased it. The school backed down, but that's when the shitstorm rolled in. Everyone is trying to get it back in the ceremony now. I'm not worried about it, but everyone hates me... kind of worried about attending graduation now. It's attracted more hostility than I thought.
School authorities and a local paper fed that hostility. The Bastrop Enterprise covered the issue in a biased article which included the following quote from a teacher.
Mitzi Quinn has been on the staff at BHS for almost 25 years, much of that time as a senior advisor. In the past, Quinn said there have been students who were atheist, agnostic and other non-Christian religions who 'had no problems' with the prayer.
'They respected the majority of their classmates and didn’t say anything,' Quinn said. 'We’ve never had this come up before. Never.'
'And what’s even more sad is this is a student who really hasn’t contributed anything to graduation or to their classmates,' Quinn said.
Well, you see Ms. Quinn, the fact that you, a school official, personally attacked the student in a local paper, and the fact that the student is now concerned about his physical safety if he attends his own graduation might be one reason atheists, agnostics, and other non-Christians “didn’t say anything” in the past. This young man is legally and morally in the right. His biggest crime here is naivete about the level of venom he was likely to face.
Here’s a video of the “moment of silence” held at Bastrop High School’s “Class Night” after the controversy broke. It illustrates the cynical sham that is the "moment of silence" in public schools:
Student speaker:
I was recently informed that I would be leading the moment of silence. However, before I fulfill my obligation, I would like to say that I am of the Christian faith. And I respect those who do not share the same beliefs as I do. But at this time I would like to give thanks to the God who has made the class of 2011 a great success.” [cheers] “For those of you who share in the same beliefs as I do, I ask that you please bow your heads as I pray. Our Heavenly Father, we come to you in thankfulness and a grateful heart for the friendships and the memories that you have given us as the class of 2011…In Jesus’ name I pray. Amen.
And those who don’t “share the same beliefs” as she does? Any atheists, Jews, or Muslims who might be attending? She’s not really talking to them. They’re not included.
After seeing what’s happened to a student who complains, you can bet they’ll know to button their lips and sit meekly in silence, whatever they might really think about being forced to attend sectarian prayers at a public school function.
Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 17:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 17:50 (UTC)Help me know, four years from now
I won't believe in you anyhow
And I'll mope around the campus
And I'll feel betrayed
All those guilty summers I stayed
But then I'll laugh
That I fell for the lure
Of the pain of desire to feel so pure
And I'll bear all the burdens
Of my little daily crimes
Wish I had a God for such cynical times
Lets face it, 90% of those kids cheering don't really believe in god either. Fact is they never put much thought into the matter and are just mouthing the words they were told to say.
Sure, most of them will go on and grow up and come to really believe it but that's only because the aren't likely to ever be exposed to anything but a culture where such belief is considered mandatory.
On the other hand the ones who go away to school, by the time they hit 22 will probably have changed religions 3 or 4 times and even if they end up settling back into Christianity it won't be anything like what they were told to believe back in their teen years. (http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/d/darwilliams1000/teenforgod1037825.html)
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 17:57 (UTC)Even so, they've got a lot invested in the Christian identity, even if they don't actually understand or buy into it. Thus the hostile reaction to dissent.
Yes, keep talking
From:Re: Yes, keep talking
From:Re: Yes, keep talking
From:Re: Yes, keep talking
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 17:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 17:53 (UTC)Um, WAT...
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:26 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 21/5/11 19:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:24 (UTC)I'm agreeing with
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:30 (UTC)I hope they get sued but honestly, it sounds like everyone from the kid's mom to the local teachers are all idiots so he's best rid of the place.
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:33 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:35 (UTC)It's not a university, it's a publicly-funded high school. Kids don't normally have much say in where they go to high school, unless their parents can afford to move to another district or put them in a private school. The fact that this is a state-funded institution means there should be a separation of church and state - it should not have a "religious bent" to it at all.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:Re: Ah yes, because it's political education, it must be...secular?
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:35 (UTC)The reasoning behind the ban is illustrated by this case. School-led prayers single out students who don't participate, and the result is quite frequently harassment.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:16 (UTC)/tic
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:You're right to be puzzled
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:31 (UTC)Damn. Just... damn.
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:37 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:35 (UTC)The thing is, to certain people public schools have always been a medium for the indoctrination of youth with good, solid Protestant religious values. The "public" in the name merely means they are funded and run by government, not that are, or should ever be, secular spaces where children are or should be free from religious instruction of any sort. It all comes down to a polar opposed view of religion's role in public life and the meaning of the Establishment Clause. These two views can be summed up as:
1. The schools are an arm of the State, and the State has at its core a generic, non-denomination specific Protestant Christianity as a de facto state religion, which encircles and enriches our government at all levels, from prayers opening local city council meetings to the quasi-religious atmosphere of Presidential inaugurations. The Founders, being good Christian men all, intended it to be thus, and if various people don't like it, too bad! They live in a Protestant Christian country, they should expect to have to endure Protestant Christianity in their daily lives.
2. The Founders, being enlightened men naturally wary of state religion, having seen the persecutions and politics that pervaded established churches over the centuries of American colonization, intended our government to be secular, not in the sense of being anti-religious or free from all religious influence, but rather being free from interference by religious bodies and being prevented from interfering in the private religious beliefs and practices of the people. Having official prayer in public schools, even under the guise of moments of silence, is in direct contravention to this secular purpose.
It's obvious which camp I belong to, but I can understand those who are in the other; I used to be myself, actually. Not having prayer in schools, taking the Ten Commandments out of public spaces, and isolated cases where it seems the Bible has been banned in schools (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._H._v._Oliva_et_al.) seem to them like a direct attack on their religious beliefs in violation of the Free Exercise Clause. I may disagree, but I can see where they're coming from.
I doubt that these issues will ever be resolved.
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:They won't be solved because both camps are wrong.
From:Re: They won't be solved because both camps are wrong.
From:Re: They won't be solved because both camps are wrong.
From:Re: They won't be solved because both camps are wrong.
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 18:53 (UTC)You have to wonder?
Date: 20/5/11 23:53 (UTC)"Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed."
— Joseph Stalin
Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:Re: You have to wonder?
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 21:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 20:03 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:37 (UTC)...in a biased article... - I had to laugh when I read this because ALL your posts are biased.
I don't think Jerrett has any place turning Damon's actions into his own anti-religion crusade.
Moral of the story: though the opposition may be great, majority doesn't necessarily mean right. - No, but it definitely means you'll be outnumbered when the chips fall. Considering the lackluster results of other "campaigns" by atheists, I doubt this will be more than a week's worth of reporting for the 24-hour news cycle. Not that I don't appreciate their effort.
(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 19:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:Re: Nobody argues whether your kid should eat burgers or Italian for supper
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 20:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 20:12 (UTC)5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 6 But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. 7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. 8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
9 “This, then, is how you should pray:
“‘Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,
10 your kingdom come,
your will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us today our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts,
as we also have forgiven our debtors.
13 And lead us not into temptation,[a]
but deliver us from the evil one.[b]’
14 For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.
^What he said.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/5/11 23:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/5/11 00:00 (UTC)(no subject)
From:If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:Re: If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:Re: If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:Re: If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:Re: If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:Re: If you don't like McDonalds go eat at Fresh Choice or visit the grocery
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/5/11 22:03 (UTC)Did you link that? I didn't see the attack.
and the fact that the student is now concerned about his physical safety if he attends his own graduation
After seeing what’s happened to a student who complains
Wait, has something happened to him? I didn't see that anywhere either.
This young man is legally and morally in the right.
You saying that they're morally wrong is exactly equivalent to them saying that you're morally wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 23/5/11 16:12 (UTC)Also, people who feel left out because they're not included in 100% of everything that happens should get over themselves. So what if Christians pray at a public gathering? Why does that bother you? If you think they're a bunch of morons for believing in the big fuzzy guy in the sky, then smirk as they do their irrational little ritual. Don't go crying to Big Brother like a toddler. Sheesh.
(no subject)
Date: 23/5/11 16:35 (UTC)Anyone who tried to say that in front of an auditorium of graduating rural Alabamians probably would be shouted down before getting halfway through the second sentence. They'd "cry to Big Brother" that they were having someone else's beliefs forced on them. It could easily be a big national news story for a few days at least.
Also (and more importantly), this isn't just a freedom of speech issue. It's a church-and-state issue too. Students can talk about their religion in their speeches. The problem comes when a someone acting in an official capacity for a public school leads everyone in a religious ritual.
(no subject)
From: